Let me understand this:
a) the hbase folks have been required to patch hadoop due to bugs
b) they have been doing this for X months now
c) we finally have momentum on getting 0.21 out the door
d) hey, let's make their life easier and take resources out of 0.21 by creating
a branch
Are we
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Allen Wittenauer
awittena...@linkedin.com wrote:
Let me understand this:
a) the hbase folks have been required to patch hadoop due to bugs
The branch is to work on adding a feature to 0.20, not for fixing bugs.
c) we finally have momentum on getting 0.21 out
On May 10, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote:
The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract
from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20
branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21).
There are X amount of hours that people can put into
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Allen Wittenauer
awittena...@linkedin.com wrote:
On May 10, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote:
The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract
from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20
branch has little relation to
On May 10, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote:
That's not how it works though - people have adopted and use Hadoop
0.20 because of the fact that people like Yahoo, Facebook, etc run it
on multi-thousand node clusters and have done so for months (or soon
to be years now).
If you look
From: t...@cloudera.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700
Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract
from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20
branch has
PM, Michael Segel
michael_se...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: t...@cloudera.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700
Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract
from the 0.21 momentum (The append
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
My proposal is to create a new branch off the hadoop 0.20 branch and name
it branch-0.20-hbase. It will have support for append/sync and will be API
compatible with the hadoop 0.20 branch. However, this branch will be
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
This branch will contain all of hdfs/mapreduce/core.
Should it be all of hadoop? Could it be hdfs only?
St.Ack
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Should it be all of hadoop? Could it be hdfs only?
Please ignore the above question (I just took a look at 0.20 repo).
St.Ack
I will try to explain my opinion on some of the questions being raised so
far. Of course all these are open for discussion and nothing is final at
this moment.
1. This code base is primarily targeted for usage by HBase and Scribe. Both
of these are Apache open source projects.
2. Accordingly, my
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
I'm a little confused and concerned now that I learn that hbase uses a
patches
hadoop. For Debian I use plain hadoop under hbase and it seems to work in
testing environments.
- Are these patches necessary to run HBase?
It
Hi folks,
I would like to open a discussion on how we can make HBase work well with a
supported/released version of Hadoop. HBase currently ships with a hadoop
jar and that hadoop jar is from hadoop 0.20 + a set of ten/twenty patches.
Most of these patches are focussed on HDFS append support in
I have a few questions about this proposal:
1) Will we open new JIRAs separately for each change we want to commit, and
go through the normal review process? Currently the 20-append work has been
mostly going on under HDFS-142 for whatever reason, with ancillary issues
only for bugs that also
On 05/07/2010 10:57 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
1) Will we open new JIRAs separately for each change we want to commit, and
go through the normal review process? Currently the 20-append work has been
mostly going on under HDFS-142 for whatever reason, with ancillary issues
only for bugs that also
15 matches
Mail list logo
