I completely agree with you Adam perhaps you email should also go to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well.
> > > This really smells like an extension and abstraction of what Maven
> > > provides and initiated. Why not do this effort under their umbrella?
>
> I believe the repository (or plural) n
Guys,
I'm afraid to get in the middle of this but I just wanted to give my
perspective on it.
> > If you want to call it "Incubating Ruper and have others join" it's ok
> > for me, as my initial idea is to use Ruper as a starting codebase, and
> > have others add stuff, but I didn't want to ma
Leo Simons wrote:
> I have also posted detailed instructions to the geronimo list
> describing how to get the geronimo site built and committed
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pache.org&msgNo=4475
> I maintain that its best if the geronimo people manage their
> own site
Ag
I have also posted detailed instructions to the geronimo list
describing how to get the geronimo site built and committed in
the appropriate location:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=4475
None of the committers felt like answering at the time :/
I maintain that its best
> One of the things that happened when we updated the main incubator
> site is that it blew away the project site(s).
OK, the README file in the incubator CVS has the instructions:
Do not use the "incubator" CVS module for project docs,
but the module of the specific project.
Check-in the
Looks like Leo posted instructions to CVS while I was away. Reading now ...
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the things that happened when we updated the main incubator
site is
that it blew away the project site(s). What do we want to tell a
project to
do about its site. How should Geronimo link a project site into what
is now
their STATUS page?
Obviously, they can just "do it", but is there
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 03:18:05PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > There is a discussion going on over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the
> > creation of an Apache jar and artifact repository. The discussion is
> > being constructive and is bringing in people from diverse efforts:
> > Maven, Ruper, G
Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> just returned from holidays.
> someone obviously removed the fax sheet at this url.
> could someone please check this?
>
> the url must be okay, it is also listed in the commiters faq:
>http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html
It must have been moved
> There is a discussion going on over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the
> creation of an Apache jar and artifact repository. The discussion is
> being constructive and is bringing in people from diverse efforts:
> Maven, Ruper, Greebo, [EMAIL PROTECTED], and others.
> * Who would like to Sponsor it?
Nicola Ken,
>From Geronimo:
> I remember when the Geronimo project had a web site at Apache.
> What are the chances that we're going to get that thing back
> up and running before ApacheCon?
> If, for example, we stirred up a lot of attention to the project
> at the Con, I can imagine the frustr
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:15, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > > This really smells like an extension and abstraction of what Maven
> > > provides and initiated. Why not do this effort under their umbrella?
>
> I believe the repository (or plural) needs artefacts beyond what Java
> projects provide.
Ma
> > This really smells like an extension and abstraction of what Maven
> > provides and initiated. Why not do this effort under their umbrella?
I believe the repository (or plural) needs artefacts beyond what Java
projects provide. I believe it was intended to contain all apache content,
and not j
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 12:16, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> peter royal wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> >
> >> The developers of Ruper in the meantime have become Apache committers
> >> (two for Gump and one is coming in with JUDDI). The issue here is that
> >> M
On 07.11.2003, at 15:28, Reini Urban wrote:
just returned from holidays.
someone obviously removed the fax sheet at this url.
could someone please check this?
the url must be okay, it is also listed in the commiters faq:
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html
The CLA has moved, please see
htt
peter royal wrote:
On Nov 7, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The developers of Ruper in the meantime have become Apache committers
(two for Gump and one is coming in with JUDDI). The issue here is that
Maven already has some code for this, and
http://greebo.sourceforge.net/ is part
Justin Mason schrieb:
We're requesting your permission to contribute your code to the Apache
Software Foundation. We're trying to become a part of the ASF and your
okay is needed (or we'll need to remove your code and with nearly 200
individual contributors, we don't look forward to that prospect)
On Nov 7, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The developers of Ruper in the meantime have become Apache committers
(two for Gump and one is coming in with JUDDI). The issue here is that
Maven already has some code for this, and
http://greebo.sourceforge.net/ is partecipating too.
If y
peter royal wrote:
On Nov 7, 2003, at 4:15 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Proposal:
This is a new kind of incubation that I'd like to try. It's not an
established project that wants to come to Apache, rather an effort
that wants to try and see if it can work, similar to Geronimo but
coming mainl
On Nov 7, 2003, at 4:15 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Proposal:
This is a new kind of incubation that I'd like to try. It's not an
established project that wants to come to Apache, rather an effort
that wants to try and see if it can work, similar to Geronimo but
coming mainly from Apache commit
- repository and board are CCed -
- please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
There is a discussion going on over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the
creation of an Apache jar and artifact repository. The discussion is
being constructive and is bringing in people from diverse efforts:
Maven, Ruper, Greebo,
21 matches
Mail list logo
