On Aug 1, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 1, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Furthermore, my understanding of copyright law is that you can't
be tainted by 'reading' source code years ago and then writing a
version independently. (In fact, the examples I've
On Aug 1, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Furthermore, my understanding of copyright law is that you can't be
tainted by 'reading' source code years ago and then writing a version
independently. (In fact, the examples I've heard of are 'minutes
apart' is legally acceptable.) Of c
The FSF demands copyright ownership on all code - which means
that they don't allow their contributions to be available
under any other license. In contrast, the ASF only asks for
a copyright license and we don't care what other licenses you
grant other people.
IIRC, the FSF assignment gives ba
All done. It was actually pretty easy but messy. In the process I did
clean up the sorting of the projects (they are sorted now) and the
duplications of the committers on the "whoweare.xml" page. Jelly is
weird stuff... :-)
Regards
Henning
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 19:00 -04
Leo Simons wrote:
So, ehm, one more time,
Could you peeps *please* stop using [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions
like this? Development at apache happens in public.
general@incubator.apache.org is the e-mail address to use for questions like
this. Please subscribe to it, read through some of its ar
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The FSF demands copyright ownership on all code - which means
> that they don't allow their contributions to be available
> under any other license. In contrast, the ASF only asks for
> a copyright license and we don't care what other licenses you
> grant other people.
On Aug 1, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On August 1, 2005 12:06:27 AM -0400 "Geir Magnusson Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comments? (Like I need to ask for them... )
I think Part II should be removed or rather be the opposite: which
components are you forbidden to pa
--On August 1, 2005 12:06:27 AM -0400 "Geir Magnusson Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comments? (Like I need to ask for them... )
I think Part II should be removed or rather be the opposite: which
components are you forbidden to participate in due to the answers in the
questionnaire. I do
--On July 31, 2005 12:54:59 PM -0400 "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Uh ... it already does. We added that ages ago. Are you asking for a
change, or just unaware?
Unaware. Doh. (Cue Guido's time machine.) -- justin
---
--On August 1, 2005 2:33:51 AM +0800 Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Isn't it possible that the ASF mailing lists and policies stay the way
they are, and that each of the Harmony contributors provide a LGPL
license separately for all code/patches provided (in advance or each
post) f
On 8/1/05, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > of trade secrets and strictly limits the rights of employers to
> > material created by an employee in their own time using their
> > materials.
>
> On paper - yes - but national l
On Aug 1, 2005, at 8:16 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Comments? (Like I need to ask for them... )
Re: Part VIII : Employment Limitations
may need to think about the differences in employment law in different
jurisdications.
Yes - we've already encountered comments about that on the l
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> of trade secrets and strictly limits the rights of employers to
> material created by an employee in their own time using their
> materials.
On paper - yes - but national law and case-law shows that as soon as that
material is even remotely in
> Comments? (Like I need to ask for them... )
Re: Part VIII : Employment Limitations
may need to think about the differences in employment law in different
jurisdications.
AIUI European employment law typically does not recognise the concept
of trade secrets and strictly limits the rights of
On 8/1/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2005 04:44, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > On 7/31/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Or is USA so much different from the rest of the world, where "in good
> > > faith", "intent of the law", "reasonable" and "c
15 matches
Mail list logo
