On 2/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign the email w/ the title $PODLING_NAME Mentor
+1
Now #2 don't prevent someone from misrepresenting themselves - which
would
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign the email w/ the title $PODLING_NAME Mentor
Now #2 don't prevent someone from misrepresenting themselves - which
would
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign the email w/ the title $PODLING_NAME Mentor
Now #2 don't prevent someone from misrepresenting
On 2/23/2006 9:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign the email w/ the title $PODLING_NAME Mentor
Now #2
We could also add to the request email a link to the podling's Status page, since that page will list the mentors and is
only writable by a PMC member.
Don
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 2/23/2006 9:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign the email w/ the title
David Crossley wrote:
[...]
So how about this ...
For mail issues, send to apmail@ + Jira.
Use the provided template.
For svn creation, send to infrastructure@ + Jira
Use the provided template.
For account creation, send to root@ using separate
requests for each new committer. Follow the
As far as I can tell, we have our paperwork in, name chosen, and proposal
accepted. Is there anything else we need at this point in order to get our
space as a podling and begin growing our community?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I think that Yoko is good to go.
ASF Infra has set up the mailing lists, SVN, and created accounts for
our new committers as well as adding the existing interested ASF
committers to the proper Unix group. I will notify the new committers
of their new accounts. There are some stragglers and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility of becoming a TLP.
It's not really a matter of choice. Incubating podlings
have PPMCs regardles of where
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:20:34AM -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 2/23/2006 9:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:
No. Account requests should go by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's their
preferred
route. Jira requests will likely be ignored.
This strikes me as odd.
*shrug*. There has previously
On 2/23/2006 11:32 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility of becoming a TLP.
It's not really a matter of
Greetings from infrastructure land.
I was recently setting up the Subversion resources for the new Webwork
podling (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html) and I ran
into something interesting. The request was for creation of the
repository space in incubator as with any other
To explain further, WebWork will form the core of Struts Action 2. We
decided to go the Incubator route for two reasons:
1. The code has minor LGPL deps that we'll need to clean
2. We want to bring in a number of new developers
Since this project is central to the future of Struts (Struts
14 matches
Mail list logo
