Hi Brian -
Yes, this is the framework that we discussed when you visited the
Hawthorne Research lab a couple of years ago. It has grown since then,
both in the number of users and in the components that "plug-in". And,
you're right, it did originally grow out of a real need to bring
togeth
> The model sounds cool, but I don't happen to like it.
Fair enough. :-)
There are several projects in the Incubator for which I could personally say
the same thing. But other ASF Members like them, and that's all good. :-)
With respect to Wicket, well I happen to like JavaServer Pages, so yo
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Congratulations and good luck to the wicket team ;)
+1 (binding)
:)
Alex
Yoav
On 8/28/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 :)
-Igor
On 8/28/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Welcome Wicket!
>
> Thanks a lot everyone! Looking forward to
Congratulations and good luck to the wicket team ;)
Yoav
On 8/28/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 :)
-Igor
On 8/28/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Welcome Wicket!
>
> Thanks a lot everyone! Looking forward to start incubation.
>
> Eelco
>
> ---
+1 :)
-Igor
On 8/28/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome Wicket!
Thanks a lot everyone! Looking forward to start incubation.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven
build of the "core" code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to release
Welcome Wicket!
Thanks a lot everyone! Looking forward to start incubation.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The vote has now, IMO, had enough time to run.
To summarise, we had 8 binding +1s, from Leo Simons, Alex Karasulu,
Jason van Zyl, Justin Erenkrantz, Don Brown, Yoav Shapira, Robert
Burrell Donkin, Upayavira, and one binding -0 from Greg Stein.
We also had eight non-binding +1s.
This means that t
Oops. I guess I should vote :-)
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
Upayavira
Upayavira wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like to call a
> vote on accepting Wicket into the incubator.
>
> As previously mentioned, the Wicket community held a una
[policy neutral] improvement to wording in ongoing activities and add link to
referenced section
Key: INCUBATOR-45
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR
[policy neutral] cut discursive material better handled in the guides
-
Key: INCUBATOR-44
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-44
Project: Incubator
Issue Typ
[policy neutral] cut line which doesn't make much sense
---
Key: INCUBATOR-43
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-43
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Improvement
Com
[policy neutral] consistent use of term
---
Key: INCUBATOR-42
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-42
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: policy
Repo
[policy neutral] cut unnecessary preamble
-
Key: INCUBATOR-41
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-41
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: policy
On 8/28/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have one or two board resolutions that it would be a good idea to
bring to the attention of new podlings. since it's board policy, i
think it'd be better to link to html documents containing the actual
content rather a second hand acc
i have one or two board resolutions that it would be a good idea to
bring to the attention of new podlings. since it's board policy, i
think it'd be better to link to html documents containing the actual
content rather a second hand account.
can anyone think of any reason why board resolutions sh
On 28 Aug 06, at 11:44 AM 28 Aug 06, Leo Simons wrote:
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 12:44:58PM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
There was discussion that incubator repository would not be sync'd to
the central repository but I don't really see much point in this. A
few folks with incubating projects ha
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 12:44:58PM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> There was discussion that incubator repository would not be sync'd to
> the central repository but I don't really see much point in this. A
> few folks with incubating projects have voiced concerns that they
> don't want to see
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 8/26/06, david reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Leo Simons wrote:
>> > I suggest something like
>> >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/doap-converter
>>
>>
>> Is this really the right place? How do the files get from thi
On 8/28/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 8/11/06, Steve Toback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Lokahi community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
>> Lokahi M01. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy
>> we wou
The Qpid project (formerly known as Blaze and Glasgow) mailing lists
are now set up. Please subscribe to the dev list if you are
interested in following or participating in the project. A commits
list is also set up for those wanting to track changes to the
repository.
Here's the info:
qpid-dev
21 matches
Mail list logo
