Folks,
ant elder wrote:
snip
Having both the last two sentences start This software will... doesn't
sound perfect to me so if we are able to move the for distribution at no
charge... bit up to the top that seems better, which gives:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
On 10/13/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a solid process for checking this?
I'm not sure we do - each project's status page (like [1] for example)
contains the Are there three or more independent committers?
question, but unless I'm missing something we don't have
On 10/16/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a solid process for checking this?
I'm not sure we do - each project's status page (like [1] for example)
contains the Are there three or more independent
Well, 4 committers with 2 from the same organization: you still have 3
organizations involved. I think 3 is not that big a number:
committers do not have to be full time employee, and level of activity
may vary greatly between committers if some are full time employee and
others work on their
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
snip
Having both the last two sentences start This software will... doesn't
sound perfect to me so if we are able to move the for distribution
at no
charge... bit up to the top that seems better, which gives:
...establish a Project Management
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution
at no charge to the public, that simplifies the development,
deployment and management of distributed applications built as
compositions of service components, where the
Not to go down a rat hole but I think that clarifying the
affiliations needs some refinement. On Apache Geronimo we have a few
committers that work for IBM but their participation is not part of
their day job. Would the committer in question for this situation
state that they are
Luciano Resende wrote:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution
at no charge to the public, that simplifies the development,
deployment and management of distributed applications built as
compositions of
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Not to go down a rat hole but I think that clarifying the affiliations
needs some refinement. On Apache Geronimo we have a few committers
that work for IBM but their participation is not part of their day
job. Would the committer in question for this situation
On Oct 16, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Simon Nash wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Not to go down a rat hole but I think that clarifying the
affiliations needs some refinement. On Apache Geronimo we have a
few committers that work for IBM but their participation is not
part of their day job.
Here is a quick initial definition. I believe that it is the
committer's responsibility to properly state their affiliation. For
instance, if a committer contributed to a project and it was approved
by their employer (company A) but not actually part of their
immediate duties I wouldn't
The vote to recommend stdcxx graduation and to forward the resolution
below to the Board at the next meeting passes with the following results:
+1 votes:
Bertrand Delacretaz
Craig L Russell
Justin Erenkrantz
Leo Simons
Martijn Dashorst (non-binding)
Robert Burrell Donkin
Stefan Bodewig
William
On Oct 16, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Here is a quick initial definition. I believe that it is the
committer's responsibility to properly state their affiliation.
For instance, if a committer contributed to a project and it was
approved by their employer (company A) but not
13 matches
Mail list logo
