Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It appears that we have a number of projects to discuss:
NMaven - mailing list shows steady activity.
XAP - mailing lists show almost no discussion, mostly JIRA issues and
commits
WSRP4J - burst of activity during the Summer, nothing
The Apache Incubator CXF team is proud to announce the availability of
the 2.0.3 release!
Apache CXF is an open source services framework. CXF helps you build
and develop services using frontend programming APIs, like JAX-WS. These
services can speak a variety of protocols such as SOAP,
Hi Rajith,
Where is the license information for artifacts included in your
binaries?
Your notice files refer to non-apache licenses for a number of your
artifacts. I would expect to see these licenses included in your
distribution. You don't give any license info for a few jars (e.g. msv
Hmm looking at the notice file, it looks like the NOTICE file was
generated from remote-resources, but it looks completely out of date.
There are several jars in the lib that have no mention in the NOTICE
file.
To name a few:
log4j, com.ibm.icu, jms spec
That's strange. Was the NOTICE
Yes, we have no use of the servlet API.
For JMS we only use the geronimo spec files.
As Martin pointed out, maven seems to be pulling all these jars into the build.
Let us investigate and get back to you guys.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 14, 2007 11:00 AM, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On 14/11/2007, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rajith,
Where is the license information for artifacts included in your
binaries?
Your notice files refer to non-apache licenses for a number of your
artifacts. I would expect to see these licenses included in your
distribution. You
On 14/11/2007, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm looking at the notice file, it looks like the NOTICE file was
generated from remote-resources, but it looks completely out of date.
There are several jars in the lib that have no mention in the NOTICE
file.
To name a few:
log4j,
On 14/11/2007, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have reduced our dependency set to the following, I will update the
NOTICE file accordingly and commit the changes so Rajith can rebuild
the Java release.
Sorry let me try that again, I don't think there is anything
suspicious in there
Hi,
A gentle reminder: this request has been posted for a few days but there is
no response yet. I understand you guys might be busy at ApacheCon.
We would greatly appreciate if the IPMC members can review this release.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL
(forgive the rambling reply)
On Nov 12, 2007 4:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XAP - mailing lists show almost no discussion, mostly JIRA issues and
commits
XAP is an interesting case. in some ways, i think that XAP has always
been short of just one independent developer
Almost done ... it is still in the lefthand sidebar.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Ben Litchfield, the author of the PDFBox library, has been working
with us at the ApacheCon preparing a proposal to bring PDFBox into the
Apache Incubator. See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal
for the current draft of the proposal.
Some of the details are yet to be worked out,
I am one of the pimary committers on XAP. As far as the board report, I just
plain missed it until it was too late.
As far as the community building is concerned, yes the lists are basically
dead. However work does continue on the project, for better or worse.
Part of the reason I stopped
JSPWiki could certainly use it! +1 from me...
/Janne
On Nov 15, 2007, at 03:08 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Ben Litchfield, the author of the PDFBox library, has been working
with us at the ApacheCon preparing a proposal to bring PDFBox into the
Apache Incubator. See
14 matches
Mail list logo
