Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag, because we didn't know that was considered part of the

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to provide a pointer in the vote mails] yeah, I went to their website and followed the link from there. So did I. The NOTICE file in

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to provide a pointer in the vote mails] Good point, will do next time. [...] There are some problems with the MD5 and SHA1 files. For example, uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.tar.bz2.md5:

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Dec 17, 2007 10:09 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also needs to be in the top level of

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Dec 17, 2007 10:09 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also needs to

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Dec 17, 2007 11:08 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ...Automated reproducible builds (including building distribution archives) are IMHO a must in our way of working. Absolutely. Our build is completely automated and reproducible, including

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread sebb
On 17/12/2007, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to provide a pointer in the vote mails] yeah, I went to their website and followed the

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread sebb
On 17/12/2007, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to provide a pointer in the vote mails] Good point, will do next time. [...] There are some problems with the MD5 and SHA1 files. For example,

Re: [VOTE] Move Project Yoko to Apache Geronimo and Apache CXF

2007-12-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote: [x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively +1 - To

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: [...] Maven can generate the MD5 and SHA1 checksums itself; no need for a separate tool. I'm not familiar with Maven, so I don't know the commands off-hand, but I can probably find them. Maybe it can, but I was unable to figure out how. We need to create checksums for the

Account Request - Mark Combellack - Tuscany (incubating)

2007-12-17 Thread ant elder
Dear root, Please create an id for Mark Combellack on the Tuscany project under Incubation. Preferred userid:mcombellack Full name: Mark Combellack Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany ICLA is on

Re: [VOTE] Move Project Yoko to Apache Geronimo and Apache CXF

2007-12-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
My +1 ... sorry On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote: [x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively +1

[RESULT] Move Project Yoko to Apache Geronimo and Apache CXF - Approved 8 +1 votes

2007-12-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
There have been sufficient +1 votes with no dissenting votes. There was discussion about IP clearance which we'll make sure is covered in the process of relocating the code. Thanks for the votes and comments. On Dec 10, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Below is a proposal that was

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag,

December 2007 Incubator Board Report

2007-12-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Shindig, a SocialContainer is entering Incubation. PDFBox and Bennu (based on the old m0n0wall project) have been proposed to the Incubator. RAT is in the Incubator, and will need to start reporting. Woden has graduated to the WS Project. FTPServer is in the process of moving to MINA. Yoko

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
Kevan Miller wrote: On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also needs to be in the top

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Though I don't necessarily agree with Kevan, the best projects to look at are recently graduated projects as those have been scrutinized by the IPMC, and have been held against the same (though possibly changing) standards as you. For instance you could take a look at Wicket, OpenJPA, ServiceMix,

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread sebb
On 17/12/2007, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary)

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Dec 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your interpretation works if your subversion repository is not a distribution. IMO, it is and should contain appropriate license/ notice/disclaimer. I don't agree with this standpoint as for instance the LICENSE and DISCLAIMER

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread sebb
On 17/12/2007, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your interpretation works if your subversion repository is not a distribution. IMO, it is and should contain appropriate license/ notice/disclaimer. I agree with

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Marshall Schor
sebb wrote: On 17/12/2007, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your interpretation works if your subversion repository is not a distribution. IMO, it is and should contain appropriate license/ notice/disclaimer.

Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating

2007-12-17 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Dec 17, 2007 10:17 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regardless of the outcome, I think that there are problems with generating the NOTICE and LICENSE files automatically. Unless the project is pure ASF, there are additional items that may need to be added to the N L files. In any case,

Re: [VOTE] Move Project Yoko to Apache Geronimo and Apache CXF

2007-12-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Ant pinged me and gently reminded me there had been no response to his comment. My apologies for closing the vote before clearing this up. On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:42 AM, ant elder wrote: The proposal mentions continuing to allow for independent releases of the Yoko code that gets moved

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate FtpServer

2007-12-17 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:53, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Gang, As the Mentor, I hereby call for a vote to graduate the FtpServer project. The MINA PMC has accepted FtpServer to become a subproject in the MINA project. This vote has now run more than 72 hours, no negative votes, no abstains