Henri Yandell wrote:
Is the first section (included below) intended for the board report,
or board@ commentary?
The former, as usual. I'm interested to know why you thought that it might
be otherwise, given the pattern of prior reports.
--- Noel
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.1-incubating
release of the Java SDO project.
Service Data Objects (SDO) are designed to simplify and unify the way
in which applications handle data. Using SDO, application programmers
can uniformly access and manipulate data from
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
There is a discussion going on Tuscany dev list whether the SDO part
of
the community would like to join the new project in the event it
will
get approved in
ant elder wrote:
I think there was consensus with the Tuscany folks to join the new project
if it went ahead
That's what I was seeing. Coincidentally, I was just reading the mail
archives when your message came in.
but after assessing all the discussions and feedback from the Incubator
it
I am happy to write up the proposal. The more I read and think about
this project the more I really think that it would be a great one for
Apache to undertake if the appropriate community can be built around it.
The only thing holding up my proposal writing is my concern for the
process.
The proposal guide is here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
One way to find a champion is to start writing your
proposal on the incubator wiki, and notifying this
list. As people understand what it is you want to
do, they may step up to the task. Starting the
proposal on the
broken link on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
---
Key: INCUBATOR-73
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-73
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if
people are actively following the page or the diffs, so here's a
summary of my review.
OK:
* CouchDB
* PDFBox (I'm a mentor)
* Tika (I'm a mentor)
OK with comments:
* CXF - Good luck for the TLP!
*
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if
people are actively following the page or the diffs, so here's a
summary of my review.
OK:
* CouchDB
* PDFBox (I'm a mentor)
* Tika (I'm a mentor)
OK with comments:
* CXF - Good luck for the TLP!
*
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proposal guide is here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
One way to find a champion is to start writing your
proposal on the incubator wiki, and notifying this
list. As people understand what it is
Marshall Schor wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if
people are actively following the page or the diffs, so here's a
summary of my review.
OK:
* CouchDB
* PDFBox (I'm a mentor)
* Tika (I'm a mentor)
OK with comments:
* CXF -
Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper karma to some
Tuscany committers that does not have access to
repo/private/committers. From a thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following
committers does not have proper access :
agrove ajborley amita edwardsmj frankb fuhwei gwinn isilval
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading
the word diversity was also probably a mistake. maybe we need to focus
on narrower concepts with alternative names.
1. the incubator should be concerned about the
On Monday 14 April 2008 20:40, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was away at ApacheCon (with fairly lousy 'net access, sadly)... I
just
updated Lucene.Net's April report.
not my experience, i found the
14 matches
Mail list logo
