Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]

2008-10-13 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi, First of all, there are lots of places that I could propose my project, but I think that open source development with the Apache Way conveys the real Free and Professional Open Source Project with meritrocracy in action. This code could be part of the Geronimo project as its Web Beans

Re: Continuous Build environment?

2008-10-13 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On 10/13/08, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Continuum currently runs on Linux - I'm currently investigating setting up a Windows server for the same. That would be very useful, if we could plan for running a Hudson agent on that server as well would be excellent. /niklas

[VOTE RESULTS] (was AW: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round)

2008-10-13 Thread Jörg Reiher
Hello, The final tally of the vote is: +1 votes: 5 (3 binding, 2 non-binding) Jörg Reiher (non-binding) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rainer Döbele (non-binding)

Re: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject

2008-10-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: Have you guys looked at the Creating an Open and Diverse community section on the graduation checklist ? Pig wishes to become a subproject of Hadoop, not a TLP. Hadoop's PMC is listed at:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-10-13 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, unless within a week from now we start seeing constructive efforts at forming an alternative policy (or clarifying the current undocumented policy) that we could vote on, I will declare this vote as passing and

Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]

2008-10-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Gurkan- have you tried to ping the Guice folks ? I wonder if they a) would be interested in joining this effort, here at Apache (Crazy Bob is an apache committer) b) prefer to work on the RI, at JBoss (Crazy Bob is EG member) c) have no steaks into the WebBeans effort -Matthias 2008/10/13

RE: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject

2008-10-13 Thread Olga Natkovich
Hi Bertrand, Pig does have two committers not affiliated with Yahoo: Pi Song and Daniel Dai. This is reflected on our who we are page. Olga -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 12:26 AM

Re: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject

2008-10-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Olga, On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Pig does have two committers not affiliated with Yahoo: Pi Song and Daniel Dai. This is reflected on our who we are page Thanks, and sorry for missing that. -Bertrand Olga -Original Message-

Incubator Board Report October 2008

2008-10-13 Thread Noel J. Bergman
In general the Incubator is operating well. The Bluesky project, which has been an area of concern, has submitted a report this month. A number of us have asked that the Maven Repository issues, which has swamped the general@ list for more than a month almost to the exclusion of all other

Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject

2008-10-13 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Noel, On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Olga, I saw your: Total: 9 +10 -1 Pig Committers: 6 +10 -1 Pig Mentors:1 +10 -1 But please note that only Incubator PMC votes actually count, and you need at least 3. Whom do you have besides

RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject

2008-10-13 Thread Olga Natkovich
Hi Noel, My understanding is that graduation into a subproject is a 3 step process: (1) Community vote (optional but desired) (2) Project that will accept the subproject (in this case Hadoop) votes (3) Incubator PMC votes. I think we completed step (1) and need to move to step (2). Is this

Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]

2008-10-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Matthias, I do not know the mail adress of the Crazy Bob. I dropped information into to the google-guice developer list about the OpenWebBeans proposal but I have got no response so far. I also dropped the message into the JBoss Seam

[VOTE]: Buildr 1.3.3 release

2008-10-13 Thread Assaf Arkin
Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within the PPMC with +6 (+7 including non-binding votes) and no -1: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] We're voting on the source distributions available here:

[jira] Resolved: (INCUBATOR-82) Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-10-13 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting resolved INCUBATOR-82. Resolution: Fixed Committed in revision 704280. Vote result:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-10-13 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a final heads up that, based on the majority vote, I will be implementing this policy change tonight unless anyone wants to propose an alternative policy. See revision 704280. It is now OK for podlings to deploy

Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]

2008-10-13 Thread David Crossley
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: I wonder the voting is stopped in this time or how will the process continue? We are not voting yet. This is just the early proposal stage. As the proposer, you will need to be familiar with the steps of the process. See docs at http://incubator.apache.org/ By the way,

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-78) Unreliable report schedule and list of podlings

2008-10-13 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12639257#action_12639257 ] David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-78: - We can parse the generated table

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-10-13 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Thanks, Jukka--- Very much admire your leadership on navigating us through a decision making process on this tricky issue. Not to mention your peaceful attitude in the midst of much passion. cheers, WILL On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, On Mon, Oct

[jira] Updated: (INCUBATOR-93) Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+By+Incubator needs clarification: process depends on who is Sponsor

2008-10-13 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Crossley updated INCUBATOR-93: Attachment: INCUBATOR-93.txt See the attached patch: In Incubation_Policy.xml ... * Add

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-79) Update guide: releasing-eclipse-update-site to correct some inaccuracies

2008-10-13 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Crossley closed INCUBATOR-79. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks, patch applied. This should not have waited, AFAIK you could have

Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]

2008-10-13 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
- Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:52:25 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] 2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Matthias, I do not know the mail adress of