The Apache RAT team is proud to announce the availability of Apache RAT 0.6.
RAT (Release Audit Tool) is a tool, which is designed to verify the
compliance with legal policies. A typical use case would be the
presence of license headers in ASF projects.
RAT was initially developed as a Google
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM, kusum kumar kusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Could anybody please comment on my GSOC Proposal of Apache PhotArk so that
i can edit my proposal if required..?
Please Kusum, let' s use photArk dev list for these discussions.
--
Luciano Resende
Apache
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
The Commons Incubator would act as a perpetual podling or mini-Incubator
overseeing the influx of components to be adopted into Apache
Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers.
They want to bring this code to Commons. What to do? IP clearance is
one thing. But what about the 2 developers? Just make them committers
while they have no clue about
Hi,
I don't think there is much overlap between Kalumet and Ace. And even if
there was, I don't see very much OSGi being used (pity, but true) - and that
makes for me autodeploy (or Kalumet :) ) useful on its own.
Mylène
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Aidan Skinner
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO apache needs to be more active at getting it's corpus into the
distributions. for a long time, the Java Trap stuff was a major social
barrier but that should dead and gone now. (isn't it?)
Ish.
On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Chris Chabotchab...@google.com wrote:
Ps, Hans De Goede has a bit more experience with several distro's then me
and offered to help out too, i've added him to the CC list.
great :-)
Hi all,
I hope non
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
what about dependencies?
I assume you mean libraries / other software on which the project
you want to package depends. Chances are good most are already packaged
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
Joining the Apache community is great news, gives more visibility to
the SocialSite community and ... lets an opportunity to the project to
not simply die.
My thoughts exactly.
Worthwhile initiative, thanks Dave!
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org wrote:
From: Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 5:32 AM
Well, the point is: we are
talking about small libraries.
Imagine there
Hi Todd,
+1 (non-binding)
Checked the following:
- NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER is in place
- RAT report looks good
- Built with JDK 1.6, Windows XP, Ant 1.7
Looks good to go :)
kind regards
bob
Todd Volkert wrote:
Our voting period expires in less than 24 hours, and our two mentors
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO apache needs to be more active at getting it's corpus into the
distributions. for a long time, the Java Trap stuff was
El vie, 10-04-2009 a las 18:45 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin escribió:
(...)
the advantage of being the upstream is that it's usually easier for us
to get stuff developed than the distros so long as we understand what
they need.
What they need is pretty obvious:
- explicit runtime dependencies
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com
wrote:
(Apache and RMS saw Java a little differently: an opportunity as
opposed to a trap. Apache has always been confident in
Hi.
I think that Matt have well explained needs for Commons Incubator . In
addition to that, this is a short story from my experience. One month ago, I
introduced my component called as Robust-Task through Commons mailing and
Incubator mailing. There were some opinions for my component and I
15 matches
Mail list logo