Announce: Apache RAT Incubating 0.6

2009-04-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
The Apache RAT team is proud to announce the availability of Apache RAT 0.6. RAT (Release Audit Tool) is a tool, which is designed to verify the compliance with legal policies. A typical use case would be the presence of license headers in ASF projects. RAT was initially developed as a Google

Re: Apache PhotArk

2009-04-10 Thread Luciano Resende
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM, kusum kumar kusu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello,  Could anybody please comment on my GSOC Proposal  of Apache PhotArk so that i can edit my proposal if required..? Please Kusum, let' s use photArk dev list for these discussions. -- Luciano Resende Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

2009-04-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote: The Commons Incubator would act as a perpetual podling or mini-Incubator overseeing the influx of components to be adopted into Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

2009-04-10 Thread Torsten Curdt
Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries. Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers. They want to bring this code to Commons. What to do? IP clearance is one thing. But what about the 2 developers? Just make them committers while they have no clue about

Re: Apache Kalumet?

2009-04-10 Thread Mylene
Hi, I don't think there is much overlap between Kalumet and Ace. And even if there was, I don't see very much OSGi being used (pity, but true) - and that makes for me autodeploy (or Kalumet :) ) useful on its own. Mylène On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Aidan Skinner

Re: Getting Apache [project] included in Linux distributions

2009-04-10 Thread Aidan Skinner
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO apache needs to be more active at getting it's corpus into the distributions. for a long time, the Java Trap stuff was a major social barrier but that should dead and gone now. (isn't it?) Ish.

Re: Getting Apache [project] included in Linux distributions

2009-04-10 Thread Hans de Goede
On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Chris Chabotchab...@google.com wrote: Ps, Hans De Goede has a bit more experience with several distro's then me and offered to help out too, i've added him to the CC list. great :-) Hi all, I hope non

Re: Getting Apache [project] included in Linux distributions

2009-04-10 Thread Aidan Skinner
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: what about dependencies? I assume you mean libraries / other software on which the project you want to package depends. Chances are good most are already packaged

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

2009-04-10 Thread Dave
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote: Joining the Apache community is great news, gives more visibility to the SocialSite community and ... lets an opportunity to the project to not simply die. My thoughts exactly. Worthwhile initiative, thanks Dave!

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

2009-04-10 Thread Matt Benson
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org wrote: From: Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 5:32 AM Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries. Imagine there

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Pivot 1.1

2009-04-10 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi Todd, +1 (non-binding) Checked the following: - NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER is in place - RAT report looks good - Built with JDK 1.6, Windows XP, Ant 1.7 Looks good to go :) kind regards bob Todd Volkert wrote: Our voting period expires in less than 24 hours, and our two mentors

Re: Getting Apache [project] included in Linux distributions

2009-04-10 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO apache needs to be more active at getting it's corpus into the distributions. for a long time, the Java Trap stuff was

Re: Getting Apache [project] included in Linux distributions

2009-04-10 Thread Santiago Gala
El vie, 10-04-2009 a las 18:45 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin escribió: (...) the advantage of being the upstream is that it's usually easier for us to get stuff developed than the distros so long as we understand what they need. What they need is pretty obvious: - explicit runtime dependencies

Re: Getting Apache [project] included in Linux distributions

2009-04-10 Thread Aidan Skinner
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote: (Apache and RMS saw Java a little differently: an opportunity as opposed to a trap. Apache has always been confident in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

2009-04-10 Thread Min Cha
Hi. I think that Matt have well explained needs for Commons Incubator . In addition to that, this is a short story from my experience. One month ago, I introduced my component called as Robust-Task through Commons mailing and Incubator mailing. There were some opinions for my component and I