Hi,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1:
IPMC (binding):
Richard Hirsch
Mattmann, Chris A
Niall Pemberton
Gianugo Rabellino
Davanum Srinivas
Alan D. Cabrera
Bertrand Delacretaz
Daniel Kulp
I'll go ahead and send the resolution to board@ and put it on the
board agenda for the 15
Would love to see Google Wave at Apache. I was very excited when
Google once announced it.
About trademark: there was an Adobe Wave before Google Wave announced
its service. I am not afraid of any trademark issues, when there is an
Apache Wave.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Soren Lassen wrote
Thanks for your interest!
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> I am interested on the topic. Currently I am doing more of Distributed
> computing work.
>
> I am a committer/PMC for some Distributed computing related projects at ASF.
>
>
> Lahiru
>
> On Tue,
Super. Thanks for bringing the trademark issue to our attention and
prompting us to add the Trademarks section to the proposal.
Soren
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks. That answers my only concern. I think this would be a great addition.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 22:45, Ralph Goers wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> OK - Have they explicitly OK'd Apache Wave? While Apache Wave would
>>> certainly be unique to Apache, if Google intends to kee
+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
>
> The draft proposal is available at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
> (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied be
Ralph,
Your due diligence is appropriate and appreciated. Thanks.
~Michael
On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks. That answers my only concern. I think this would be a great addition.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Soren Lassen wrote:
>
>> I wo
Thanks. That answers my only concern. I think this would be a great addition.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Soren Lassen wrote:
> I work for Google and I speak on the behalf of the Google Wave team. I
> can assure you that Google supports the Apache Wave proposal. We
> always
I work for Google and I speak on the behalf of the Google Wave team. I
can assure you that Google supports the Apache Wave proposal. We
always wanted to transfer ownership of the open source code to the
developer community and, with the discontinuation of development of
Google Wave as a standalone
On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> ...
>> OK - Have they explicitly OK'd Apache Wave? While Apache Wave would
>> certainly be unique to Apache, if Google intends to keep using Google Wave
>> (and Wave as a shorthand) this woul
I agree, there are other wave implementations popping up, some of which include
"wave" in the name and some don't. "Lightwave" for example is one such
project. I think that Apache Wave and the Wave in a Box product should be fine.
Also, as Dan points out "Google Wave" product is going to cease
Hi Edward,
I am interested on the topic. Currently I am doing more of Distributed
computing work.
I am a committer/PMC for some Distributed computing related projects at ASF.
Lahiru
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Thanks, that sounds great.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at
While Google owns the Google Wave trademark, they don't own the very generic
"Wave".
Apache Wave will be a separate thing and unaffected by any trademark that
Google owns.
James Purser
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> >
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers wrote:
>...
> OK - Have they explicitly OK'd Apache Wave? While Apache Wave would
> certainly be unique to Apache, if Google intends to keep using Google Wave
> (and Wave as a shorthand) this would get very confusing.
Don't you think that by proposing
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:29 PM, David Wang wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Ralph Goers <
> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/23/2010 04:44 PM, Ralph
On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:29 PM, David Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/23/2010 04:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Hello all,
>>>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> > On 11/23/2010 04:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >> On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incu
On 24/11/2010 00:45, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
FYI Ross, I also +1'ed this.
Appologies. I must have missed that. Thanks for your vote and support,
it's now recorded in the result thread.
Ross
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
The result of this vote i
FYI Ross, I also +1'ed this.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> The result of this vote is:
>
> 10 binding +1
> 7 non-binding +1
>
> Full summary of the votes are below.
>
> I'll start getting things set up - thanks for you support folks.
>
> Votes cast:
>
> B
Oops, thanks David.
Will update later tonight...
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 2:10 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Please don't just "remove" the entry. It needs to
> move down to the "Graduated" section.
>
> -David
>
>> Author: mattmann
>> Date: Tue Nov 23 17:49:40 2010
>> New Revision: 1
On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 04:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
>>>
>>
>> Did Google have any trademarks on Wave and are th
On 11/23/2010 04:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hello all,
We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
Did Google have any trademarks on Wave and are they allowing them to be
transferred to the ASF?
Certainly looks like they do
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
>
Did Google have any trademarks on Wave and are they allowing them to be
transferred to the ASF?
Ralph
-
...take care of in INFRA-3217 (thanks Gav and Joe) [1]. Also, handled in
Incubator-ville in r1038225 [2].
Thanks a lot to the Incubator community!
Cheers,
Chris
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3217
[2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1038225&view=rev
---
Please don't just "remove" the entry. It needs to
move down to the "Graduated" section.
-David
> Author: mattmann
> Date: Tue Nov 23 17:49:40 2010
> New Revision: 1038225
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1038225&view=rev
> Log:
> Handle OODT TLP graduation from Incubator: thanks guys!
>
The result of this vote is:
10 binding +1
7 non-binding +1
Full summary of the votes are below.
I'll start getting things set up - thanks for you support folks.
Votes cast:
Binding +1s
===
Alan Cabrera
Isabel Drost
Ant Elder
Ross Gardler
Daniel Kulp
Benson Margulies
Marcel Offermans
+1 from me, of course
On 17/11/2010 13:10, Ross Gardler wrote:
Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal
can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is
copied below.
[ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the foll
Hello all,
We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
The draft proposal is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
A wave is a hosted, live, concurrent data structure for rich communication.
It can be u
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>>
>> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
>> ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequent
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
> ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
> commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to graduate to a ne
+1 (non-binding)
Joe
On 11/22/10 6:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to graduate to
Thanks, that sounds great.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> I am not an IPMCer but I'd like to give help on discussing, (non binding)
> voting and generally giving support to the community related processes.
> I am involved in some projects at Incubator (Cler
Hello,
I asked about this issue to current mentors few weeks ago. One of them
agreed and said: "Please do. I don't have enough time to follow it
closely, and it seems the others are inactive."...
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi Edward...
>
> From [1] I see tha
Hi Edward...
From [1] I see that you already have 3 mentors, can you explain why
you need more ? :)
[1] - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/hama.html
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Oh thanks, I'll fix it soon.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Daniel Shahaf
+1
Niall
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
> ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
> commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to grad
The vote passes with the 17 +1 votes (8 binding), no -1 votes.
Binding (8):
Jukka Zitting
Bertrand Delacretaz
Grant Ingersoll
Michael McCandless
Matt Benson
Doug Cutting
Benson Margulies
Alan Cabrera
Non-Binding (9):
Tommaso Teofili
Thilo Götz
Marshall Schor
Nick Kew
Marcel Offermans
Mohammad N
Hi Edward,
I am not an IPMCer but I'd like to give help on discussing, (non binding)
voting and generally giving support to the community related processes.
I am involved in some projects at Incubator (Clerezza, Amber, Stanbol) so,
if you want, I'd be happy to share my experience.
Regards,
Tommaso
37 matches
Mail list logo
