On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as part
of the graduation requirements. These exit interviews will be suitably
scrubbed
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:44:14PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is
a roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that
role for the ASF will be
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:49:55PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:49:51PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
+pOnce the vote has been called the proposal should be considered fixed.
+ No
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as part
of the graduation
Thanks Chris! We'll get started on all the required steps.
Matei
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:35 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1
Chris Mattmann*
Konstantin Boudnik
Henry Saputra*
Reynold Xin
Anomnity of the individual not the project. I can say my mentor was
crap without stating my name - I could be any one of the PPMC.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54
Hi Ali,
unfortunately i have not seen the IPMC reviewing the release within
the three days voting period.
Please leave the vote open and write a reminder from time to time.
here is some more information on the voting status:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
Cheers
On Wed,
This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the support of your mentors).
There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1 votes.
It is not my intention to tally the votes. I
Woot. Thanks Ross!
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the support of your mentors).
There are no -1 votes and
Resending with [RESULT] tag as (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...I think that it would be a great idea to have an ASF wide ombudsman
instead...
We don't have that, and I don't think we need it - people should feel
free to contact people that they trust (officers, board members, ASF
If the idea of the 'Ombudsman' is sort of like an 'elder
Statesman' role as well, then I may be interested...
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:44:14PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
+10.99
(the .9 is for Marvins amusement ;-)
Ross
On 20 June 2013 14:00, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
If the idea of the 'Ombudsman' is sort of like an 'elder
Statesman' role as well, then I may be interested...
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Daniel
Very cool :-). Thanks Ross and everyone!
Sanjiva.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
Resending with [RESULT] tag as (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This vote is now
Ross - huge thanks. Great champion-ing.
Paul
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
Resending with [RESULT] tag as (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This vote is now
Thanks Ross for seeing this through.
Azeez
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the support of your mentors).
Hi Ali,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 03:06 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
The voting period has now passed, and we have received no votes from
anyone
here :(
Sorry, folks are too busy debating the problems of the Incubator to take
time to review Incubator releases. ;-)
I'll try to take a look tonight and
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+10.99
+Inf
Good grief, could there be a better candidate, in terms of either substance or
symbolism?
(the .9 is for Marvins amusement ;-)
It worked!
Marvin Humphrey
Hi, As a newbie, I've generally quietly watched from the sidelines, but
now I'm jumping in.
+1 about expectations vs rights. In fact, it occurred to me that a
booklet or pamphlet more like the What to expect whenŠ book would be
better. IMO, correctly set expectations make for happier people.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
2) Apache has been around long enough and is large enough to have its own
culture, with its own societal rules and tribal history. Lots of it is
written down, but it is hard to find.
I never thought of that...Apache
FWIW, my concerns about an Ombudsman are:
1) I had no idea what an Ombudsman was. I'd heard of it, but never had to
work with one before. I had to go look it up. If I had a complaint, I'm
not sure I would know to look up that word to find the email address to
complain to.
2) If you create a
+1
Having also come to Apache by joining a now graduated podling (Apache
Jena) I like the idea of a What to expect document and agree with pretty
much everything that you lay out here. I think people outside of Apache
often don't appreciate how a volunteer organization operates and many of
your
The vote to release mesos-0.12.0-incubating has passed with 3 IPMC binding
+1s and 5 non-binding +1s.
IPMC Binding Votes:
Alex Karasulu
Chris Mattman
Tom White
Non-Binding Votes:
Vinod Kone
Deepal Jayasinghe
Brenden Matthews
Yan Xu
Andy Konwinski
Thanks all!
-- Forwarded message
Hey Guys,
Sorry I missed this.
Real quick CC to general@i.a.o. I'm not an expert in the Clutch.
IPMC peeps that know the clutch, Knox has a release in the dist
area:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/knox/
(^^ for example the 0.2.0 release)
Can someone give us some insight as to
11. In certain circumstances, there are specific people charged with
certain responsibilities. Over time you can expect to learn who they
are, and where they hang out. Your mentor should be able to guide you
while you do learn. If, for whatever reason, they are unable or
unwilling to, you can ask
Could someone please grant me write access to the Incubator wiki
My username is RobVesse
Thanks,
Rob
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Vesse rve...@yarcdata.com wrote:
Could someone please grant me write access to the Incubator wiki
My username is RobVesse
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I have written up the suggestions so far into a wiki page
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhatToExpect
The content is pretty much what has been included in this thread
reorganized with a few minor grammar tweaks here and there.
If people like this notion feel free to edit the page or continue
To distinguish between these two documents, they have different
flavours. One sets the expectations of podlings members, the other tells
mentors what is expected of them. This latter one should not be
forgotten. It is easy to sign up as a mentor, but not so easy to follow
through.
Having
Hi Ali,
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZzAJHMp8dN%2BUfpF6s%2BDGw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
I find this
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Ali Lown a...@apache.org wrote:
The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
This will be the initial incubator release for Wave.
The proposal for release can be found at:
I should have added: please do address the problems here and re-roll and
I will be sure to examine that release in a timely fashion. Don't let a
-1 discourage you, as most incubating projects have to go through a
learning curve.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hi Ali,
Joe,
Thanks for your comments. Can you clarify for us the PPMC comment. I think we
are a bit confused between the concepts of a top level project PMC, the
incubator IPMC, the PPMC you have mentioned, and piddling mentors. I don't
think we had ever discussed nominating a PPMC assuming that
Just one quick question. I notice that you include the bouncy-castle jar in the
distribution.
Have you looked into the need to file an ECCN for crypto?
Regards,
Craig
On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Ali Lown a...@apache.org wrote:
The Wave
On 21 June 2013 00:59, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hi Ali,
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
Hey Guys,
Sorry I missed this.
Real quick CC to general@i.a.o. I'm not an expert in the Clutch.
IPMC peeps that know the clutch, Knox has a release in the dist
area:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/knox/
(^^ for example the 0.2.0
The problem seems to be getting worse. Some people make
source changes to docs, but then do not follow through
to publish those changes via the CMS. Then other changes
bank up behind the logjam.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
-David
Hi David,
That's my bad. Having not published the site using the CMS since we
switched over, I knew I had to read the docs again but hadn't. I
fully intended to though.
Anyways, sorry.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior
Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
Hi David,
That's my bad. Having not published the site using the CMS since we
switched over, I knew I had to read the docs again but hadn't. I
fully intended to though.
Not only you. It is a common holdup.
There are various routes for editing, as explained
39 matches
Mail list logo
