Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

2013-10-04 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, while the release artifacts look good to me, I had no luck with compiling the sources. I first tried with Java 1.6 and was informed that I would need Java 1.7. So I tried with 1.7 but now I am getting failures in some tests, namely in the Kiwi triplestore reasoner. I made a few trials, cleaned

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-10-04 Thread Ashish
+1, sounds good On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > So Apache Merlin sounds good to me. > Any objections? > > On 25 September 2013 23:47, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > Nechtan sounds cool also. Please note, in the german wikipedia its > > translated with "The tremendousnes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

2013-10-04 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi On 04/10/13 16:06, Fabian Christ wrote: while the release artifacts look good to me, I had no luck with compiling the sources. I first tried with Java 1.6 and was informed that I would need Java 1.7. So I tried with 1.7 but now I am getting failures in some tests, namely in the Kiwi triplesto

Re: Apache project bylaws

2013-10-04 Thread Alex Harui
OK, here is my next offering. The patch form is at [1] Some notes: -This offering has 3 new entries to glossary.html as well. -I was very tempted to move the Veto sections from Voting.html to Glossary and merge the Consensus Gauging through Silence section from Voting into Glossary. -I am also t

Re: Apache project bylaws

2013-10-04 Thread Joseph Schaefer
IMO none of the new glossary entries are worth doing. Procedural votes are votes about bylaws and other rules which you will apply to self-govern, so they deserve an appropriate treatment. "Discouraged from voting" is perhaps too harsh a sentiment, what we want those people to know is their opinion

Re: Apache project bylaws

2013-10-04 Thread Doug Cutting
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Who is permitted to vote is, to some extent, a community-specific thing. > However, the basic rule is that only PMC members have binding votes, and > all others are either discouraged from voting (to keep the noise down) or > else have their vote

request edit rights for incubator wiki

2013-10-04 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi all I need edit right on the incubator wiki for shepherding. Or should I send my notice to the ML? Thanks and greetings Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-

Re: request edit rights for incubator wiki

2013-10-04 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > I need edit right on the incubator wiki for shepherding. Please let us know your login for the Incubator wiki. (Not your apache id.) > Or should I send my notice to the ML? On Monday, I plan to extract all the shepherd comments from thi

Re: request edit rights for incubator wiki

2013-10-04 Thread Raphael Bircher
Am 04.10.13 21:30, schrieb Marvin Humphrey: On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: I need edit right on the incubator wiki for shepherding. Please let us know your login for the Incubator wiki. (Not your apache id.) It's the same: rbircher Or should I send my notice to th

Re: Apache project bylaws

2013-10-04 Thread Greg Stein
On Oct 3, 2013 12:52 PM, "Joseph Schaefer" wrote: >... > e.g. how to vote properly > on personnel issues, and that should entirely suffice. Even Greg > doesn't seem to know what consensus voting means in this context, Really, Joe? Why did you throw that in? I know what consensus voting is. I also

Re: request edit rights for incubator wiki

2013-10-04 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Am 04.10.13 21:30, schrieb Marvin Humphrey: > >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> >>> I need edit right on the incubator wiki for shepherding. >> >> Please let us know your login for the Incubator wiki. (Not you

Re: Apache project bylaws

2013-10-04 Thread Joseph Schaefer
Really, Greg? Can't you tell you're not using the same language I am, but I'm using the actual documentation? Please see http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary#ConsensusApproval and see how it jives with what you are saying. Personnel votes are always subject to veto, even committership, when

[RESULT][VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

2013-10-04 Thread David Crossley
Adjusting the email Subject to "[RESULT][VOTE] ..." to enable the voting status monitor: http://incubator.apache.org/facilities.html#voting-status -David Dave wrote: > I am officially closing the vote. We have 11 binding +1 votes, 4 > non-binding votes and no -1 notes. Usergrid is now officially

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

2013-10-04 Thread Chris Mattmann
Hi David, Just an FYI I also VOTEd +1 on this. Congrats and good luck! Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: David Crossley Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Friday, October 4, 2013 5:08 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack f