On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:34 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I know you're passionate about this Marvin but as it stands I'll be
voting against this proposal.
I plan to propose this as an experiment
Well
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
Define lower bar. Do you see any of the review items
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt as optional?
...Probably all of those could be optional or
Therefore, when we say that incubating releases can have small IP loose
ends, we mean:
* This is an official release, created by an act of the Foundation.
* It is known to violate policy.
* It could be removed, but no one has done so yet.
I'm comfortable with relying on
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
If we deleted every
release from the main Foundation distro area that had some divergence
from some policy, no matter how tiny, my suspicion is that the distro
area would become rather sparse.
Yes quite. And
Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
and
healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
critical
and can be successfully mitigated by documenting the tasks that are
currently
Hey Imesh
I can help, who are you trying to grant permissions to?
-Jake
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Imesh Gunaratne im...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
I'm writing regarding setting up Jenkins for Apache Stratos (incubating).
According to instructions given here [1] I tried to grant
Hey Marvin
For Aurora everything is progressing nicely. All initial setup and on
boarding is completed and development has started using ASF infrastructure
(jira/reviewboard/etc). No blockers or issues at this time.
Usergid was not listed in the reports for this month, as a new podling less
than
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
and healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
critical
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
For Aurora everything is progressing nicely. All initial setup and on
boarding is completed and development has started using ASF infrastructure
(jira/reviewboard/etc). No blockers or issues at this time.
I've taken the
Hi Jake,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
I would like to grant permissions to my apache user:
Username: imesh
Email: im...@apache.org
Many Thanks
Imesh
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
Hey Imesh
I can help, who are you trying to grant
done, please use the builds@ list if you have any questions
-Jake
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Imesh Gunaratne im...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Jake,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
I would like to grant permissions to my apache user:
Username: imesh
Email: im...@apache.org
In the process of preparing the LICENSE and NOTICE files for Storm, I started
looking at what other Apache projects (both incubator and TLPs) have done.
It seems like approaches are all over the map. I've even seen projects that
don't have a NOTICE.
My question to any mentors and PMC members
ant elder wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
If we deleted every
release from the main Foundation distro area that had some divergence
from some policy, no matter how tiny, my suspicion is that the distro
area would become rather sparse.
Yes quite. And lets not forget how the rules
On Dec 10, 2013, at 6:15 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
In the process of preparing the LICENSE and NOTICE files for Storm, I started
looking at what other Apache projects (both incubator and TLPs) have done.
It seems like approaches are all over the map. I've even seen
Hi Jake,
Thanks so much! Yes for sure, will do.
Many Thanks
Imesh
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
done, please use the builds@ list if you have any questions
-Jake
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Imesh Gunaratne im...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi
Thanks Suresh, that's a big help.
Having a recently approved example helps a lot. The source vs. binary release
examples help as well.
It's kind of interesting to see how this has changed over time and varies from
project to project.
Taylor
On Dec 10, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Suresh Marru
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
It's kind of interesting to see how this has changed over time and varies
from project to project.
Here's Roy Fielding in June 2008, saying exactly the same thing you'll hear
from us now:
http://s.apache.org/Y4v
Thanks Marvin, that helped me out quite a bit!
- Taylor
On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
It's kind of interesting to see how this has changed over time and varies
from
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Added to a new usage proposal section at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist - does that
proposal work for you guys?
I
19 matches
Mail list logo
