Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire HDT

2014-12-04 Thread Monosoft Mapple
What do u Want? Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 05/12/2557 BE, a las 6:13, Marvin Humphrey > escribió: > > Best wishes to HDT's contributors in your future endeavors. > > Marvin Humphrey > >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: >> The VOTE passed with 6 +1 binding votes from t

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire HDT

2014-12-04 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Best wishes to HDT's contributors in your future endeavors. Marvin Humphrey On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: > The VOTE passed with 6 +1 binding votes from the following PPMC members. > > Jeffrey Zemerick > Chris Mattmann > Suresh Marru > Roman Shaposhnik > Rahul Sharma > Mir

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Daniel Dai
Sounds good. I will request to be IPMC member, that will help. Thanks, Daniel On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Ah so I stand corrected. > But I am not sure if then your VOTE will bind once the project going > to incubator. > It would probably help for SAMOA to have you as

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Henry Saputra
Ah so I stand corrected. But I am not sure if then your VOTE will bind once the project going to incubator. It would probably help for SAMOA to have you as member of IPMCs. - Henry On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Oh, I am under the impression that mentor has to be IPMC membe

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Daniel Dai
Oh, I am under the impression that mentor has to be IPMC member, but champion can be either IPMC member or Apache member: "Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation (i.e. is an Officer only), the Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the Sponsor."( http://incubator.apache.org/incubat

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread jan i
On Thursday, December 4, 2014, Henry Saputra wrote: > I was not saying to stop it but Daniel needs to send request to > private@ list make sure he is part of IPMCs. Agreed, sorry if my wording sounded differently. rgds jan i > > - Henry > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, jan i > > wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Henry Saputra
I was not saying to stop it but Daniel needs to send request to private@ list make sure he is part of IPMCs. - Henry On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, jan i wrote: > On Thursday, December 4, 2014, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> Daniel, >> >> Small formality, as I remember champion has to be member

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread jan i
On Thursday, December 4, 2014, Henry Saputra wrote: > Daniel, > > Small formality, as I remember champion has to be member of IPMC in > which you are not. > Since you are a member of ASF, you can just send email to > private@incubator.a.o to be added as member of IPMC. I agree we need formaliti

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Henry Saputra
Daniel, Small formality, as I remember champion has to be member of IPMC in which you are not. Since you are a member of ASF, you can just send email to private@incubator.a.o to be added as member of IPMC. - Henry On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to prop

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Rob Weir
> > Please vote > +1 for accepting corinthia into incubator > 0 for dont care > -1 for not accepting corinthia into incubator (please add a reason). > +1 (binding) . . . > == Initial Goals == > > The initial and most important goal is to enlarge the community consisting > of developers, testers,

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

2014-12-04 Thread Hal Lockhart
My apologies. Hal > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 11:10 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > It will be cool to see a XACML project at Apache, e

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
Only if you are case insensitive ;) -- Gianmarco On 3 December 2014 at 23:29, Julian Hyde wrote: > Note that — especially if one does crossword puzzles — the name is > extremely close to Samza. > > On Dec 2, 2014, at 9:27 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose SAMOA as

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Julian Hyde
Note that — especially if one does crossword puzzles — the name is extremely close to Samza. On Dec 2, 2014, at 9:27 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose SAMOA as an Apache Incubator project. > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SAMOAProposal > > I've posted posted the text

Re: [VOTE] Release Samza version 0.8-incubating

2014-12-04 Thread Jakob Homan
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > - the gradlew script and wrapper jar are missing from the top level > (referenced in docs; not sure whether it was omitted intentionally to > avoid distributing the jar) Intentionally: for the source release, we can't include the jar (and th

Re: [VOTE] Release Samza version 0.8-incubating

2014-12-04 Thread Jakob Homan
This was worked out in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-283. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> - the gradlew script and wrapper jar are missing from the top level >> (referenced in docs; not sure whether it w

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Falcon version 0.6-incubating

2014-12-04 Thread sebb
I think the usual convention is to use [RESULT][VOTE] There is a bot that tries to keep track of ongoing votes; I don't know if it handles [CLOSED] On 3 December 2014 at 04:52, Seetharam Venkatesh wrote: > Hi folks, > > Thanks for taking time to review and vote on this release. The vote passes

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Peter Kelly
> On 4 Dec 2014, at 1:07 am, Peter Kelly wrote: > >> desires have been expressed on the AOO mailing list however that for many of >> the things Corinthia aims to do, a complete re-write would be the most >> viable option. Just to clarify - what I was referring to was a rewrite of AOO, given it

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

2014-12-04 Thread Peter Kelly
> On 4 Dec 2014, at 12:53 am, Jake Farrell wrote: > > +0 > > concerns being: > - would this project be better suited as a part an existing ASF project, > AOO or ODF Toolkit On the difference with AOO - it's a different architecture and very different goals. AOO is an office suite, while Corint