Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I don’t really know the answer to that. Ralph > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > >> Yes, please go ahead. > > What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub? Should

Re: Apache Metron - licensing question

Jon, It appears that the code at [1] was initially committed on Mar 8, 2016. The code in Apache Metron [2] was committed on April 13, 2016. The code in Metron [2] appears heavily derived from the code in the initial repository [1]. In the Metron repository that code has an ASL v2 license and

Re: Request karma for editing podling report wiki

Thanks. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, sospartan wrote: > >> I'm request for the karma to editing podling report wiki. >> My wiki username: sospartan >> > > Karma granted, happy reporting! > > Nick > >

Apache Metron - licensing question

Hi all, I recently asked a licensing question to our dev mailing list. I did get feedback from one of our mentors, but he also requested that we get a double check. Please

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Agreed, however this is where it gets complicated (and at least needs to be > clear to the contributors, or maybe I'm the only one thinking this is > confusing/not obvious). The ASF accepts contributions from

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:24 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> The question is whether we need to keep this section: > >> > >> Portions of this software were developed by

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

Thanks for the review guys, will come back to dev@ list to update the release artifacts. - Henry On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >> >>> The

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: The question is whether we need to keep this section: Portions of this software were developed by Twitter. Copyright Twitter, 2017 in the NOTICE file. Since Twitter already signed off the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Josh Elser wrote: - hide quoted text -- show quoted text - > * It looks like your NOTICE file can be essentially encapsulated by > the LICENSE file. If the only "text" you're adding to the NOTICE > file is a

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

Hello incubator PMCs, The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.6.0 (incubating). Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > * It looks like your NOTICE file can be essentially encapsulated by > the LICENSE file. If the only "text" you're adding to the NOTICE > file is a copyright text, you can just include that in the LICENSE > file. Josh,

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > The question is whether we need to keep this section: > > Portions of this software were developed by Twitter. > Copyright Twitter, 2017 > > in the NOTICE file. Since Twitter already signed off the source >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

The question is whether we need to keep this section: Portions of this software were developed by Twitter. Copyright Twitter, 2017 in the NOTICE file. Since Twitter already signed off the source contributions, we could probably remove this section. As for initial Copyright notice, we should

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

Thank you, Josh. Will address your comments. On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > -1 (binding) your source releases still do not contain the DISCLAIMER file > that John pointed out in rc2 [1]. > > * mvn apache-rat:check fails on

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

The vote has passed! +1 (binding) - Tom Barber Justin Mclean Josh Elser 0 - (nil) -1 - (nil) Thank you for your help, Svante PS: I have written a JIRA task for the ODF Toolkit to review the given feedback and bundle it into

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> ...The very first line of this thread is a link to an INFRA ticket. A >> comment on that ticket links to this very thread... > >

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > ...The very first line of this thread is a link to an INFRA ticket. A > comment on that ticket links to this very thread... Ok thanks! It would be nice to change the title of that

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> ...Can I just work with the infrastructure team to >> make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?.. > > As Marvin explains very

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > Yes, please go ahead. What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub? Should it be deactivated/deleted? 2 of the 3 PRs there have already been applied in the past and I asked the author of the most current third one to

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > ...Can I just work with the infrastructure team to > make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?.. As Marvin explains very well I don't think we need a formal vote but I'd like whatever actions are taken, as well as their