Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

; of the Apache FreeMarker Project, and to have primary responsibility > > for management of the projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache FreeMarker Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > >

Re: Write access to January report page

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 17:13 -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be > > editable by Mentors/IPMC members? > > It's editable by anyone whose wiki username

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 -David (jonesde@a.o) > On 25 May 2016, at 13:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept CarbonData > into the Incubator. > > ​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain >

Re: Wiki Access - Podling Mentor

Thanks John, worked just fine. -David > On 11 Apr 2016, at 17:25, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > David, > > Please give it a shot in a minute or two (moin moin is slow slow) > > John > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:33 PM David E Jones <

Wiki Access - Podling Mentor

I’m helping as a mentor for the FreeMarker project so need access to sign reports (namely on this page now: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016). My Apache username (and account on wiki.a.o) is ‘jonesde’. Thank you, -David

Re: Karma for new account (jonesde) on wiki.apache.org

Report time for FreeMarker has come around again and I still don’t have permission to edit wiki pages to sign the report, currently the page at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016 Am I going about this wrong? -David > On 4 Jan 2016, at 09:15, David E Jones <d...@dejc.com&

Re: Business Framework Project

I'm not sure if this is the best forum for this discussion, but it's a good discussion and I also can't really think of a better forum! So On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Ahmad Khalifa wrote: There are various commercial vendors doing this sort of thing. Most are aimed at having doing

Re: Business Framework Project

On Jan 22, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Ahmad Khalifa wrote: J Aaron Farr wrote: Ahmad Khalifa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ultimately, what this would be good for, is to offer several pre-built applications along the lines of CRM, ERP, Accounting, POS, etc... just like some already available

[VOTE][RESULT] Graduate OFBiz Podling

Burrel Donkin, Davanum Srinivas, Noel Bergman +1 - 2 (Non-binding): David E. Jones, Christian Geisert +0 - 0 -1 - 0 Thanks again to everyone who have helped get OFBiz to this point. I have been very impressed with the activity and interest by many people throughout the incubation process

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

On Nov 22, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, I'm guessing we'll close this vote next Monday, after the long holiday weekend? Because activity has slowed on this vote I was thinking of announcing the result today, but there is no hurry so Monday is fine. -David On 11/20/06,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator The vote passed with 8 binding +1 votes Those would be which ones? I do not see 8 binding votes (yet). I

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

/incubator-ofbiz-dev/ 200611.mbox/browser It's in the November 2006 archives, currently on page 5 within those archives. The thread subject is [VOTE] OFBiz Graduate from Apache Incubator. The binding votes are from David E. Jones, Hans Bakker, Si Chen, Al Byers, Jacques Le Roux, Jacopo Cappellato

[VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator based on the Incubator Policy exit guidelines here: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Exiting +the+Incubator The vote passed with

[VOTE][RESULT] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS5

again for Robert Donkin for his thorough review of all of this and help getting things cleaned up. -David On Nov 1, 2006, at 10:20 PM, David E Jones wrote: The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now

Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS5

On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/7/06, David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:52 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/2/06, David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I read through the stuff on the 3party.html page you referenced

Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS5

On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:52 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/2/06, David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now requesting a vote for review and approval from

Re: How to get a source OFBiz release WAS: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS5

Robert, others interested, I'm still not sure whether or not we will want to do this going forward because I'm not sure how a source distribution would be used for a project like OFBiz. Still, if there is any demand for it then I agree we should do it. However we go in the future, this

[VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS5

The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now requesting a vote for review and approval from the general Incubator group and the Incubator PMC. The current incubation docs recommend doing this sort of

Re: OFBiz: we need help to complete the NOTICE and LICENSE files

On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Leo Simons wrote: I think this looks good, too. However, it has some content at the bottom: *** Apache 2.0 *** ... *** JDBM LICENSE v1.00

Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS3

I've done another pass on the LICENSE file to hopefully address this problem, but I'm not really sure that I understood exactly what it needs to look like, so feedback on this would be great. The updated LICENSE and NOTICE files are available here:

Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS3

On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: NOTICE should not have the list of licenses that apply - that's for the LICENSE file. NOTICE should contain any required informational notices required by those licenses. For example, JDBM (the last entry in LICENSE) requires in

Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS3

On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:05 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 9/28/06, Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robert, I'm one of the OFBiz committers and I'd like to thank you for your great scrutiny: this is very helpful and we are currently working to fix all the issues that you

[VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS3

The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus internally approving the 4.0.0 TS3 test snapshot release. We are now requesting a vote for review and approval from the general Incubator group and the Incubator PMC. The current incubation docs recommend doing this sort of

Re: OFBiz - next steps

On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:26 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: On 2/13/06, Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: J Aaron, thanks for your feedback. Sorry but I still have some doubts about this: if a guy signs an iCLA in which he states that he agrees to release under the ASL all the work (present

Re: OFBiz - next steps

On Feb 10, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, I have a question for you: what is the iCLA template we should collect from the OFBiz's contributors? The one here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt ? If so, maybe I'm wrong but... I don't see how this document will

Re: OFBiz - next steps

and start sending out requests... -David On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 08.02.2006 09:48:39 Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 2/7/06, David E. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any guidelines about the size of a code

Re: OFBiz - next steps

On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Actually, it is only needed from everyone who might own copyright to some part of the work. So, it is those people who have contributed functionality greater than a simple bug fix. OTOH, the mentors should be aware that, because this work is

Re: OFBiz - next steps

On Feb 4, 2006, at 6:04 AM, David N. Welton wrote: *) IP clearance checklist - I need to make a copy of that in SVN here, /incubator/site-author/ip-clearance. I'll try and get that done over the weekend. I have some questions specific to the IP clearance issue for OFBiz. I looked at the

Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Proposal

On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:44 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal = OFBiz Proposal = +1 (non-binding) I'm obviously a little biased on this because of my involvement in OFBiz and not sure if my vote is even appropriate, but I wanted to make sure everyone

Re: OFBiz Marketing and Services

This isn't a problem at all. That is an area that we have tried to make more clear over time, ie that Undersun does not own nor have any exclusive relationship with the OFBiz project. This is actually one thing that I really like about the potential OFBiz/ASF relationship: it clarifies

Re: Proposal for OFBiz to Join the ASF

On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:57 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: This proposal has caught my interest. I'd be willing to help mentor. That would be great. I've been skimming through the policy emails that have been on this list for the last few days and it's sounding like 3 mentors is something that

Re: Proposal for OFBiz to Join the ASF

On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: There IS a conceptual and code-level separation between the OFBiz framework and components built on top of it, but I think it makes a nice cohesive project together. It's sort of like if Tomcat and Struts were under the same umbrella: not

Re: Proposal for OFBiz to Join the ASF

On Jan 12, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote: As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way. That is a misconception. For projects targetting