Re: [DISCUSS] Druid incubation proposal

Woot! +1 for druid incubation. -h On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Gian Merlino wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to open up a discussion about incubating Druid at Apache. I've > included a proposal in this mail and have also posted a draft at >

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

==  * Brian McCallister brianm at apache dot org == Nominated Mentors ==  * Henning Schmiedehausen henning at apache dot org  * Jean-Frederic Clere jfclere at gmail dot com  * Gianugo Rabellino gianugo at apache dot org  * David Jencks djencks at apache dot org (Waiting on IPMC) == Sponsoring Entity

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.1-BETA5

+1 Sorry for being late. -h On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:00, Paul Lindner plind...@linkedin.com wrote: The Shindig community voted on and approved the release of Apache Shiindig 1.1-BETA5. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Podling vote thread:

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

+1 On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:12, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software Foundation. The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software Foundation

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

no, don't recommend yet, because ... The vote will be open for 72 hours until Wednesday 2:00 am (UCT). The following IPMC members have already voted in favor of graduation on the Click dev list: Henning Schmiedehausen Will Glass-Husain Andrus Adamchik The proposed board resolution is included

Re: [VOTE] publish cassandra 0.3.0

Pretty much what Ant said. However, let's make this a bit stronger: -1 to this release proposal. You failed to uphold the basic rules for an incubator release. Please go back and review what is required from you to make a release. -h On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:49, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com

Re: Mentors role after Graduation?

IMHO, expected: no. I would expect the PMC to ask their mentors whether they want to stick around (common courtesy). If a mentor was involved in more than just steering the project through incubation, I would assume that they will be on the PMC anyway, otherwise it should be fine to either

Cassandra slides from NOSQL event

After a co-worker just pointed me at the slides from NOSQL, consider me moderately pissed that in all slides, the fact that this project is in incubation at Apache and wants to be part of a larger community was not mentioned even once. Folks, just glueing a feather on your homepage and then

Re: [VOTE] Release Click 2.1.0-RC1

+1 for releasing this. Looks good to me. On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 23:04, Henning Schmiedehausen henn...@apache.orgwrote: Yes, it does. Thanks. I looked briefly through the package and I don't see any show stoppers. Ciao Henning On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 07:59 +0200

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

Oh, I am +1 BTW. ;-) On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:51, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: ...

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

I did basic checking of the candidate and the RAT report and based on that I vote +1 Sorry, that it took me a while. Ciao Henning On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:23, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: The Olio community has voted and approved this first binary

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Shindig Incubator 1.0

Calm down, Jason. No one was attacking Maven. The Apache Software Foundation requires a project (not just an incubator podling. All projects) to release source in a form that can be used to recreate the binaries. For the current state of the Shindig release, this is not possible. Noone was

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Shindig Incubator 1.0

Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice. An Apache releases consists of source code. Binary artifacts are just an add on bonus. I can ping Roy on that subject if you beg to differ. ;-) However, as (at least for the Java part), all source code is available as

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

I did not answer in time. I would like to stay on as a committer and on the PMC. Ciao Henning (My frigging mail server died. Can you believe that? And it is 6,000 miles away from here...) On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 15:28 -0700, Upayavira wrote: On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 23:25

Re: [VOTE] Suspending Projects -- XAP

Noel J. Bergman schrieb: In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4 months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP, I am raising this as a vote. --- Noel

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

Sorry, took me a while. Builds fine with JDK 1.6 under Linux i386 using ant 1.7.1 rat report looks fine. +1 Ciao Henning On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 01:02 +0200, Bob Schellink wrote: New snapshots are available with the following changes: # build.properties has new

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

Hm, I thought I was subscribed to private-click ... but then again, that is gene...@incubator. - Builds for me on JDK 1.6.0_12 on i386 Linux. - I vote +0 for this release. Reasoning: -- It is not obvious to me how to turn off GPL dependencies like Hibernate. The get-deps download downloads all

Re: [Proposal] Terminate RCF incubation.

RCF is a sore point with me for a while (being a mentor on it). It hasn't moved at all and from what I know from Matthias, it is held up by some internal struggle at $BIG_COMPANY_DONATING_IT. Threatening to terminate it is probably the best way to get a decision. I would give them a 30 day's

RE: Incubator Report November 2008

+1 Har har har, now we have two pieces of Facebook technology. =:-) SCNR Henning On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 18:11 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Update: The most contentious, and it isn't very contentious at that, discussion is regarding the Helenus proposal, which is to

Re: Allow incubator releases? [was: way too wordy]

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 13:45 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: How about a brand new idea? Lay down a Milestone-style chart of what it takes to operate as an ASF project. Demonstrate community of meritocracy, add committers or ppmc members based on contributions, complete IP review, and

RE: status of PGP support in Maven

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 10:21 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: We don't have to. We can simply mandate that every ASF project sign their artifacts and charge the Maven PMC with enforcing it. No. The Maven PMC is charged

Re: [Vote] accept Droids into incubation

+1 On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 22:00 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation. The proposal can be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal The text of the proposal = Droids, an intelligent standalone robot framework = === Abstract

RE: status of PGP support in Maven

On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 12:31 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: We don't have to. We can simply mandate that every ASF project sign their artifacts and charge the Maven PMC with enforcing it. No. The Maven PMC is charged with developing software for the Apache Maven project. If we really want to

RE: status of PGP support in Maven

On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:20 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: There is a pretty nice proposal on http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/, however this will again take a piece of freedom of doing software at Apache away and introduce some administrative overhead

Re: On incubating releases

, On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did vote -1 not because I think that the current position is all fun and games, but because it is the adopted policy of the incubator as stated on the incubator pages. Changing it on a whim through a vote thread

Re: [VOTE] accept Olio into incubation

+1 (as a mentor) Ciao Henning On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 07:33 -0700, Craig L Russell wrote: Please vote on accepting Olio into incubation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: On incubating releases

On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:41 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, Branching off from the release distribution vote. On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This vote has made it quite clear that we have a much deeper disagreement over the status of incubating

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

wrote: On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I enjoy your scenarios... And again, there is no high nineties security. Your solution is either secure or it is not. For accuracy; This is not true either. AFAIK, no security solution is totally

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:54 +0100, sebb wrote: On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included. Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly. I will check that the jars in question

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:54 +0100, sebb wrote: It's a pity that the Tomcat jars don't contain proper manifests + N L files; I'll see about raising that with the Tomcat developers. Huh, what? On my freshly downloaded apache tomcat 5.5.27, the servlet API contains Specification-Title: Java

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:34 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote: The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is because a source build like Apache ServiceMix depends on hundreds of third party dependencies.. so an end user would need to end up Yes. Now you are getting closer.

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:42 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is because a source build like Apache ServiceMix

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: How do you validate that the pub key presented to you is genuine? Every project worth it's salt has a www.apache.org/dist/{tlp}/KEYS file which contain that project's contributors signatures, countersigned or not. Ideally, they are extensively countersigned

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 19:52 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote: HI, On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiram suggested to put the signatures into the source, which in turn is also distributed from the repo. It's not. The sources you build come

Re: [DISCUSS] Names for the Web2.0kit

We seem to have some way to check these through nameprotect.com. Once we narrowed down to two or three candidates, we can check these there. Ketero sounds a lot like Kitaro. :-) Olio is nice (and short, which I like). Ciao Henning On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 02:44 -0700, Craig

Re: [VOTE] Accept VCL into Apache Incbator

+1 On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 00:36 -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote: This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please indicate your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator. Proposal is included below for posterity. We're looking for a few more mentors. If there is

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 10:08 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about we include the signatures in the source distros? That way if you

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

it was not permitted to distribute those. This was the main reason why he rejected the release. Martijn agreed with that too. @Thomas: since Tomcat is distributing them, why can't we? Rainer -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Henning Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:29 +0200, Thomas Fischer wrote: @Henning: the thread is http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing (empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 01:02 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: [...] Currently, it has checking turned on by default, but that isn't going to be a reasonable setting for some releases to come until the signatures in the repository are cleaned up. At the moment I've populated unsigned artifacts with a

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:00 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote: Does anyone know where to obtain distributable versions of the servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar from? The only implementations I know come from Sun Microsystems and are under CDDL License. Tomcat is shipping implementations, so there

Re: Incubator Maven repo [WAS Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository]

On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:57 -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: I voted +1, but I personally think the vote is kind of irrelevant. [...] Thus: If the central maven repository maintainers (Maven PMC) decide to put incubator artifacts into their repository without a click through this is

RE: Incubator Maven repo [WAS Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository]

On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 13:19 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I still maintain that unless Maven makes swift strides to enforce signing, the ASF should ban the use of the Maven repository for all ASF projects, and go so far as to remove all of our artifacts. sorry, but that is ridiculous. That

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating andapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release

On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote: Hi Henning, thanks for your vote. Here are a few answers to your comments: Testing is currently performed by running the two example applications provided with the distribution, which contain various tasks. Each of them is run

Re: Incubator Maven repo [WAS Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository]

On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 20:14 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:57 -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: I voted +1, but I personally think the vote is kind of irrelevant. Thus: If the central maven repository maintainers (Maven PMC) decide

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

-1 Here are my reasons: - If incubator artifacts are distributed the same way as regular artifacts, it removes one of the pain points for Incubator projects to graduate. Personally, I feel this pain point is intended. - It makes it too easy for other projects to depend on incubating artifacts.

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

Yes, they can. Every member of the empire-db svn group should be able to change the incubator site files. Please try, if not, it is a bug. Ciao Henning On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:20 +, Thomas Fischer wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rainer Dbele wrote: ... As far as

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release

md5sum and sha1sum (on linux) did not like the checksum files. Checksums are ok, though. gpg key is ok. rat looks good. apache-empire-db builds for me. Can't say much more. Unit tests? Any kind of code verification? Test suite? This is hopefully just coming soon, right? :-) nitpick: build

Re: Depending on incubating project

Branch and experiment. FtpServer does not need to be one-dimensional. You will probably not release this code to an unsuspecting public anyway, will you? ;-) Ciao Henning On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 11:54 +0200, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Hi Within Apache FtpServer, a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Etch

From my understanding, Tuscany could leverage Etch to offer a wire format that can be consumed by a variety of different languages and environments, not a contestant to it. Ciao Henning Mike Edwards schrieb: Folks, Can I ask if anyone has compared Etch with Apache

Re: [VOTE] accept Tashi into the Incubator

+1 Doug Cutting schrieb: Please vote on accepting Tashi into the Incubator. Tashi's proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal Thanks! Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [PROPOSAL] Etch

Call it Edge. :-) My concern is mainly 2. And you will get lots of Linux support questions on your mailing list. Ciao Henning James Dixson (jadixson) schrieb: I have heard the name concern a couple of times now... When we picked the name Etch about 18 months ago,

Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator

Sounds interesting. +1 On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 20:02 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: Hi all, please vote on accepting project PicaGalley (originally proposed under the name of Caitrin) for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor. This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT, unless

Re: [PROPOSAL] Etch

You adressed the two concerns that I have, too, thanks. - The name. Debian Etch is a deeply engrained meme with the Etch short cut. - Office disussions. Projects where a large number of committers are from the same organization and that also have this company being invested in the project might

Re: Click Incubation - Status

My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors and/or rewrite code where the contributor can not be tracked down. The AL allows relicensing under AL2 ( :-) ),

Re: added empire-db to reporting schedule

Thanks Martijn. On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 10:15 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote: I've added empire-db to the reporting schedule (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule) I took the liberty to add empire-db to the March, June, September, December schema, even though our last 3-month

Re: Click Incubation - Status

-0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors

Re: Click Incubation - Status

Thanks for pointing this out; in case of Click, this probably means that all current contribution, which are already covered by Apache licenses are fine. So, while it is nice to track down the original authors and get ICLAs from them to explicitly assign the code to the ASF, it is actually not

Re: Click Incubation - Status

to the Click project. I will still try and obtain ICLA's from previous contributors. regards Malcolm Edgar On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, this is the current status for the Click incubation: - ICLAs for Malcolm, Bob and Naoki have

RE: SVN move

Ask Cayenne who worked that way for a long time. Ciao Henning On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 11:19 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their old project site, to minimize disruption for

RE: [PROPOSAL] Tashi

On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:22 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: XEN e.g. is GPLv2 licensed and you can not host any code at Apache that needs to be linked with XEN. Now that raises an interesting question ... if we define our own vendor neutral, Apache licensed

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tashi

On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:10 -0700, Doug Cutting wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: [...] Hi Doug, I noticed that you cut out the part about interfacing with Apache-incompatible code. As this project will be surrounded on all sides by non-Apache license able code, do you have a plan on how

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tashi

Hi, a number of questions: - Are the proposed committers, people assigned to work on the project or are they genuinely interested in this software. IAW, will they stick around or leave as soon as they are reassigned to other projects or their grants run out? The wording for the Yahoo! slot

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

And the results are in: +1 Alan D. Cabrera (*) Andrus Adamchik Bertrand Delacretaz (*) Davanum Srinivas (*) Eelco Hillenius Henning Schmiedehausen (*) Jim Jagielski (*) Les Hazlewood Martijn Dashorst (*) Niall Pemberton (*) Niklas Gustavsson Siegfried Goeschl Ted Husted (*) Will Glass-Husain

Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

I obviously vote +1, too. :-) On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:14 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: = Click Proposal = This proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

Malcolm, Bob can you give a short statement for that question? [I understood that all proposed committers will be on the PPMC, right?] Ciao Henning On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 12:59 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I'm forced to vote -1 for the following section, the rest

Empire-DB Incubation Status

Hi, Current status: - ICLAS for Rainer, Matthew and Manuel have been received - Code grant has been received Open items: - CCLA for esteam has not yet been received (strictly speaking that is optional but as Empire-DB has been developed largely inside esteam, it would make me feel better to

Re: AW: Empire-DB Incubation Status

Nachricht- Von: Henning Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 10:57 An: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Rainer Döbele; Matthew Bond; Jörg Reiher; Manuel Gamerdinger; Thomas Fischer; Martijn Dashorst Betreff: Empire-DB Incubation Status Hi, Current

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we really need an incubator?

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:06 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Yes, it would be nice if Maven was more secure, properly checked signatures, and properly delegated namespaces so that third-parties would be unable to add artifacts within other org's trees. None of those issues are specific to

Incubator Wiki policy (was: Re: A zone!)

where required ofc. AFAIK, those limitations are not for the regular Wikis under wiki.apache.org (which are MoinMoin wikis). There could be a few special incubator rules, too. :-) Ciao Henning -- Chris On Jul 15, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen

[VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

* Bob Schellink * Naoki Takezoe * Ahmed Mohombe * Henning Schmiedehausen * Will Glass-Husain * Ted Husted * Andrus Adamchik == Sponsors == === Champion === * Henning Schmiedehausen === Nominated Mentors === * Will Glass-Husain * Ted Husted * Andrus

BlueSky clouded? (was: Re: svn commit: r676177)

: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is 256, right? */ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we really need an incubator?

Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is 256, right? */ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-78) Unreliable report schedule and list of podlings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12611369#action_12611369 ] Henning Schmiedehausen commented on INCUBATOR-78: - I thought every

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

And the results: +1: Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) 0: none -1: none (*) = Incubator PMC member. Congratulations

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

[ Whoops, once again with the right subject line to wake up people with mail filters. :-) ] And the results: +1: Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-78) Unreliable report schedule and list of podlings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12610872#action_12610872 ] Henning Schmiedehausen commented on INCUBATOR-78: - why not re-use marvin

Re: [docs] Sitemap...?

+1! On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 06:37 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: i'm currently working on some improvements to audit (yes i know - six months late). i'm plan to use texen to generate indexes for the audit pages. so, i finally got round to porting the sitemap code from the w.a.o site.

[PROPOSAL] Click

* Bob Schellink * Naoki Takezoe * Ahmed Mohombe * Henning Schmiedehausen * Will Glass-Husain * Ted Husted == Sponsors == === Champion === * Henning Schmiedehausen === Nominated Mentors === * Will Glass-Husain * Ted Husted === Sponsoring Entity

Re: [PROPOSAL] Click

as a mentor. I may not be able to dedicate lots of time to that, but still I hope to be helpful every now and then. Andrus On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Please see also http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClickProposal Comments until July 9th, if nothing blocking

[VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

=== * Need a new Jira project called empire-db. == 4. Identify the initial set of committers == * Rainer Döbele * Matthew Bond * Jörg Reiher * Manuel Gamerdinger * Henning Schmiedehausen * Thomas Fischer * Martijn Dashorst == 5. Identify Apache sponsoring individual == We kindly request

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

Oh, and obviously I vote +1. :-) Ciao Henning On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:32 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: This vote will run until Monday, July 7th, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason

[PROPOSAL] Empire-db

of committers == *Rainer Döbele *Matthew Bond *Jörg Reiher *Manuel Gamerdinger *Henning Schmiedehausen *Thomas Fischer *Martijn Dashorst == 5. Identify Apache sponsoring individual == We kindly request the Apache Incubator PMC to be the sponsor for this project. === Champion and Mentor

Mentors for Empire-DB Projects wanted

Hi, the Empire DB project (proposal at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Empire-dbProposal) is looking for a few more mentors to help with incubation. I'd very much appreciate if people from the DB project would help here, as this is a database-related topic. :-) Best regards

Re: Mentors for Empire-DB Projects wanted

Thanks. I've added you to the mentors list. Ciao Henning On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 10:52 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote: I'm willing to be a Mentor, but more from an IPMC pov. I'm not a DB buff :-) Martijn On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL

Re: Export Notification - Using BouncyCastle in Tuscany Rel 1.0

Please be aware that rebuilding the jar means that it is no longer signed and does not work as a security provider. Ff you want to use the bouncycastle security provider and this recompiled jar in the same application, you will get clashes. Class Loader fun. The whole monty. :-) The cleanest

RE: [VOTE] JSPWiki Incubation

+1 to incubation. Go JSPWiki! On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 13:16 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Are we ready to incubate? Seems as if we have: Dave Johnson Sam Ruby Henning Schmiedehausen Craig L Russell as Mentors. Given that there was no [VOTE] explicitly posted, and at least one

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

Huh, am I late? +1 (mentoring JSPWiki... ;-) ) Best regards Henning On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:41 -0400, Dave wrote: The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes now and no -1 vote have been cast. Binding: +1 Craig Russell +1 Noel Bergman

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

as a Software Engineer in Secuenzia, an IT consulting firm in Madrid. Sponsors Champion Champion: Dave Johnson Nominated Mentors People who have announced their willingness to be Mentors are * Dave Johnson * Sam Ruby * Henning Schmiedehausen Sponsoring Entity

Re: Request to accept the Sling project for Incubation

+1 On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:10 +0300, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, As described in [1], please acknowledge this request to enter the Sling project into incubation. The Jackrabbit PMC has voted (see the vote request [2] and results [3]) to approve the Sling project (see the proposal [4]) for

Re: [Vote] Accept Sanselan for incubation

Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 |a s Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen |n - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Proposal] Java Resource Simulator (JRS)

Big +1. That kind of tool I would have needed a few months ago... :-) Best regards Henning On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal [...] - To

Re: [Proposal] Java Resource Simulator (JRS)

Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of well, there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s inside that we want to clean up first and need time? Best regards Henning On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 14:28 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On

Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

is it? A mentor must be a member or at least one mentor must be a member? Confused Henning On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 13:57 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

mentors are Martin van den Bemt (mvdb at apache dot org), Carsten Ziegeler (cziegeler at apache dot org), and Henning Schmiedehausen (henning at apache dot org). Please cast your votes. Thanks, Omar Tazi - Omar Tazi Chief Open Source Evangelist

Re: [vote] JDO out of incubation and into the DB project ( was Re: [discussion] JDO out of incubation)

On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 22:41 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this. So what say ye? [X] +1 Graduate

Re: Moving Lucene.NET (aka DotLucene) to Apache

On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 05:41 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote: George - I'm bringing this issue to the incubator list. I've not been very actively involved in the Incubator, and I got an error trying to commit the new directory you request. $ svn add lucene.net/ A lucene.net

RE: JDO2 Snapshots

I'd even add could you please write this up as general instructions for projects wanting to put their stuff up for testing / for official releases As far as I was able to gobble together: www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ - synced to ibiblio - for official releases only, no snapshots,

Re: JDO2 Snapshots

You can always add maven.repo.remote = http://svn.apache.org/repository, http://www.ibiblio.org/ to your build.properties and state in the docs for JDO that unofficial releases are available from there. Add this information to the POM for the JDO jar. Regards Henning

Re: searchable mailing list archives

He still got a point though. While mod_mbox is ok for browsing (however the index seems to be breakable just like with eyebrowse, see e.g. INFRA-480), eyebrowse offers more functionality (like searching, sorting by author e.g.) Where is the problem with eyebrowse? Noone looking after it?

  1   2   >