Re: PMC is a committee

Greg It isnt wrong to correct improper usage particularly when there is a specific case that caused actual confusion. That should be done by the person that was confused and with the person that caused confusion. Joe On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM Greg Stein wrote: > I have witnessed

Re: [QUESTION] Oracle JDBC Driver as a test dependency

Hello In general with all such things ASF and licensing a great place to start for information is here [1]. It lays out the different categories and how ASF Legal has designated a given license. The way to really consider this largely comes down to whether you package that binary in a release

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1(binding) On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:45 PM Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > +1 ( binding ) > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:00 PM Dominik Riemer wrote: > > > [X ] +1, bring StreamPipes into the Incubator..

Re: [Vote] call a vote for IoTDB incubation proposal

+1 binding. would be interested to participate as a mentor thanks On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, 12:53 PM Matt Sicker +1 (binding) > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 08:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 11/7/2018 2:46 AM, hxd wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Sorry for the previous mail with bad

Re: Graduation Resolutions Should Not Include Project Bylaws Clause

John, The clause as written right now doesn't speak to the ASF level bylaws. It gives the PMC the specific tasking to create bylaws. If not removed the language should probably change to not encourage creation of new bylaws but rather understand the implicit adoption of the ASF level bylaws.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Verified source bundle signature and hashes and disclaimer. Verified build and distribution artifact (no live testing). Tephra release vote findings/improvements for consideration: 1) Use of md5 hashes worth removing in future releases 2) Copyright year in source and binary notice

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 4/25/17, 1:27 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > > +1 binding > > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:48 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

+1 (binding) On Apr 13, 2017 11:25 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > Folks, > > The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling. > This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no > development with no change on the horizon. > > Context for

Re: Apache Metron - licensing question

; 1: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/commit/bc140a571a78c428e9ae5a3315c427724183782f >> > >> > Much appreciated, >> > >> > Jon >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, 11:33 PM Joe Witt<joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: Apache Metron - licensing question

Jon, It appears that the code at [1] was initially committed on Mar 8, 2016. The code in Apache Metron [2] was committed on April 13, 2016. The code in Metron [2] appears heavily derived from the code in the initial repository [1]. In the Metron repository that code has an ASL v2 license and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metron podling Graduation

+1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > +1 (binding) > >> On Mar 29, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Casey Stella wrote: >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> I propose that we graduate Apache Metron

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 binding On Jan 7, 2017 2:20 PM, "Edward Zhang" wrote: > +1 > Glad to see Range will graduate! > > Thanks > Edward > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Drew Farris wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM Niclas Hedhman

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating) - rc1

+1 (binding) Review focused on the source release mechanics specifically around build/licensing. Signature checks out w/SHA512 Hashes all check out Verified last meaningful commit in specific tag found in source. Full clean build as per instructions found in readme worked perfectly. Commentary:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.7-incubating RC2

+1 (bindng). Conducted a review focused largely on mechanics of the source release and licensing. Findings as follows: good - hashes check out - signature checks out - source release license/notice/3party license references look great! nicely done - full clean build w/out tests +

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

Is this what you're looking for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > I remember we used to have a checklist of things published > somewhere, but I can't find it anymore?

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

t; paperwork or clarified any cryptographic export license concerns. > > Required Resources > > Mailing Lists > > d...@pirk.incubator.apache.org > > priv...@pirk.incubator.apache.org > > comm...@pirk.incubator.apache.org > > Source Control > > Pirk

Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal

;> Corporate Contributor License Agreement to the Apache Software Foundation; >> the Software Grant Agreement is forth coming. >> >> == External Dependencies == >> >> We believe all current dependencies are compatible with the ASF guidelines. >> Our dependency lice

Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal

es/exports/ we believe Pirk is > classified as ECCN 5D002. In the event that it becomes necessary we will > engage with appropriate Apache members to ensure we file any necessary > paperwork or clarified any cryptographic export license concerns. > > == Required Resources == > &

Re: Joe Witt joins the Incubator PMC

/release review diligence but I can sure try to help take the edge off! On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Welcome Joseph! > > Martin > > > >> From: mar...@rectangular.com >> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:48:35 -0700 >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gossip into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Very interesting and hope to participate. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:14 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept > Gossip into the Apache Incubator. > > The Gossip proposal can be found here [2]

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Justin, Speaking from the NiFi side I can assure you an enormous amount of time, energy, and communication go into LICENSE and NOTICE handling for this project. We've had discussions with PMC and committers of other projects to learn their approach as well as to encourage them to follow these

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2.0 or >> Apache-compatible license. As we grow the Beam community we will configure >> our build process to require and validate all contributions and >> dependencies are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license or are under an >> Apache-compatible license. >> >> ==

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hello This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute. Thanks Joe On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman wrote: > Of course! I'd be happy to help > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.2.0

John, The language within the header of those files includes things like the following as found in ltmain.sh # As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, # if you distribute this file as part of a program or library that # is built using GNU Libtool, you may include this file

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding). Solid apache mentors and team. Good luck! On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > +1 (binding) > > — Hitesh > > On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to >> call a VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Come to think of it a bit more, yes I am not satisfied with the outcome of > the CTR/RTC exchange in the project. > > Hence changing my vote to > -1 [binding] > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:47AM,

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

"Trust is the basis of a healthy community" -- For sure. "and RTC (via Jira or otherwise) just screams "we don't trust you. we must review all commits first."" -- I disagree. RTC has merit independent of concerns of trust. If trust issues are present in a community then any number of

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache NiFi from the Incubator

:05 AM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Apache Incubator This thread is to call a vote within the Incubator for the graduation of Apache NiFi. Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html Incubator graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/wmy NiFi community

[VOTE] Graduate Apache NiFi from the Incubator

Hello Apache Incubator This thread is to call a vote within the Incubator for the graduation of Apache NiFi. Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html Incubator graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/wmy NiFi community graduation vote: http://s.apache.org/GT9 The

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

to make the Board meeting this week? On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:26 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 14 June 2015 at 17:52, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

cause a delay. -Sean On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Sean sure makes more sense than me. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Sean is one of those folks i referred to. Id be an easy +1 On Jun 12, 2015 9:24 AM

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Sean sure makes more sense than me. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Sean is one of those folks i referred to. Id be an easy +1 On Jun 12, 2015 9:24 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

to determine what is suitable. The community + mentors should be a better group to discuss it. On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Niclas, I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing act of course. How would about this modification

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

changes should in my opinion by discussed on your dev@ list. The IPMC should be presented with a resolution that the community agrees on. rgds jan i. On 14 June 2015 at 17:18, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Adjusted to clarify the 'realtime' reference which can be misleading

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

Sean is one of those folks i referred to. Id be an easy +1 On Jun 12, 2015 9:24 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: As Sean says he's been engaged with the project while acting as mentor, IMHO beyond mentor-ly duties. If the NiFi folks will have him on the initial PMC and he's

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator

Hello it would be nice to see a bit of statistics like number of releases in incubator, growth in incubator… Mailing lists: The dev mailing list has 123 legit addresses on it and is quite active for discussion, votes, feature ideas, etc.. We’ve just recently created a user list as requested

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.1.0-incubating

Justin, First, thanks for attempting to validate the release. You will need to build all three components mentioned above in order. The error you note suggests that the nifi-parent was not built before attempting the build of nifi-0.1.0. We expect most releases to be much easier to validate

Request to create a new mailing list for apache nifi

Hello The apache nifi dev list has had a few requests and discussions about starting a user mailing list. I submitted the JIRA request for it today under here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462 But was advised to have the PMC chair submit the request and by doing so through this

Re: Request to create a new mailing list for apache nifi

Can it be the same moderators as dev@nifi? Believe that is myself (joewitt) and Tony Kurc (tkurc) Thanks Joe On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: Who would you like as the moderators for the new list? -Jake On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Joe Witt

Re: Request to create a new mailing list for apache nifi

Gavin, Appreciate your help. I am doing exactly what you asked and following the trail of guidance. Thanks Joe On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: On 17 Apr 2015, at 3:42 pm, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hello The apache nifi dev list has

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating release

Hello The Apache NiFi team is excited to announce the release of Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating. Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. Apache NiFi was made for dataflow. It supports highly configurable directed graphs of data routing,

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating

Hello, The IPMC vote to release Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating passes. The IPMC vote thread is here: http://s.apache.org/nifi-0.0.2-ipmc-voteresult Summary: 4 (binding) [+1] 0 [= 0] The following binding +1 votes were received: - Sergio Fernandez - Justin Mclean - Benson Margulies - Billie

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating

Hello The Apache NiFi PPMC has voted to release Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating. The vote was based on the release candidate described below. We now request the IPMC to vote on the release. Here is the PPMC voting result: 6 +1 (binding) 0 = 0 (binding) Two of the +1 votes were from IPMC members.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Streams 0.1-incubating release

Julian Take a look here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer Also in the checklist for things to validate http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list It calls out the disclaimer. As a rep from a project that just finally cracked

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Streams 0.1-incubating release

in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFI 0.0.1-incubating

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Will investigate how to have the build process for the convenience binaries not add the auto-generated dependencies file and for it to use our license

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFI 0.0.1-incubating

at 10:23 AM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Billie My concern with the dependencies file is the false sense of security it can sometimes give. These are dependencies for which Maven can find the license information. If it can't it isn't something that could be clearly called out/articulated

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFI 0.0.1-incubating

Hello, The IPMC vote passes. The IPMC vote thread is here: http://s.apache.org/nifi-0.0.1-ipmc-voteresult Summary: 6 (binding) [+1] 0 [= 0] The following binding +1 votes were received: - Sergio Fernandez - Drew Farris - Andrew Purtell - Justin Mclean - Benson Margulies - Jan Iversen All

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFI 0.0.1-incubating

files that don't have license info for their bundled dependencies, but they do all have DEPENDENCIES files listing this information. I haven't worked with these dependencies files before. Are they sufficient for communicating license information? On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Joe

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFI 0.0.1-incubating

Hello The Apache NiFi (incubating) team is pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi 0.0.1-incubating. With six binding (in the ppmc sense) +1 votes and no dissenting votes the PPMC has approved the vote for the release in this thread: http://s.apache.org/nifi-rc3

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of January2015 by JosephWitt

John, I am not quite sure how to do that. Where can I find that? The mentor list we have is from here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html Thanks Joe On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Hi Joe, I see you updated your mentor sign off list.

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of January2015 by JosephWitt

/content/podlings.xml On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 3:12:00 PM Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: John, I am not quite sure how to do that. Where can I find that? The mentor list we have is from here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html Thanks Joe On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:09

Re: Running an experiment with pTLP

Benson, Speaking from within the nifi ppmc I'd be happy to try this. Most of us in the nifi ppmc (excluding the mentors) are quite new to Apache so we're either perfect because we lack any of the biases or terrible because we're too ignorant to the good and bad. But I for one would be happy to

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

Hello I am a very new participant in Apache and a member of the ppmc for apache nifi (incubating). So I thought it would be good to share that perspective for this discussion... In writing the NiFi proposal this section was honestly a bit awkward. The other sections are largely about providing

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of December2014 by JosephWitt

It was requested by Benson. On Dec 6, 2014 6:40 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: All, Please see below change by Joseph Witt. He signed off on the NiFi report on behalf of Benson. Is that generally considered to be OK? John On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 10:21:13 PM Apache Wiki

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of December2014 by JosephWitt

On the dev@nifi.I.a.o mailing list. On Dec 6, 2014 7:14 AM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: It was requested by Benson. On Dec 6, 2014 6:40 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: All, Please see below change by Joseph Witt. He signed off on the NiFi report on behalf of Benson

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of December2014 by JosephWitt

The exact thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-nifi-dev/201412.mbox/%3CCALJK9a7OzgKTNh0R9qpqD8_pCmOXpqN4yagQCSkTY6zQQayp3g%40mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks Joe On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: On the dev@nifi.I.a.o mailing list. On Dec

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

John, I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing so now though to avoid any confusion. Thanks Joe On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Is it me or

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

in Flume which solves similar problems to NiFi is a good sign that multiple projects and communities can co-exist within the space and even provide complimentary capability. Thanks Joe On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Josh, Really appreciate it and have

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

know. Thanks Joe On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: ... http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal Note that AFAICS some of the nominated mentors are not members

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now that the vote for incubation has kicked off i'm not sure what i'm allowed to do or not. Will check will Benson. For what it is worth I agree Sean raised a great point. I think it will be an important part of our community

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

Andrew - I've updated the proposal to reflect you as a mentor. * Andrew Purtell (Salesforce) apurtell at apache dot org, IPMC Member Thanks again Joe On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

/ ++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ -Original Message- From: Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com Reply

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

to be it. 2. What is the overlap with Apache Camel (if any)? Cheers, Hadrian [1] https://github.com/Nifi On 11/19/2014 09:02 PM, Joe Witt wrote: Hello, I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project. In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

the IPMC and we can go from there. - Josh Joe Witt wrote: Hello, I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project. In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the proposal can be found here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal Thanks Joe = NiFi

[PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

Hello, I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project. In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the proposal can be found here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal Thanks Joe = NiFi Proposal = == Abstract == NiFi is a dataflow system based on the

[Request] Wiki Access

Hello Can I please have access to edit the wiki? I'd like to submit a project proposal. I've already created a wiki user. User: JosephWitt Email: joe dot witt at gmail dot com Thanks Joe

Re: [Request] Wiki Access

Thanks Nick On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Nick Burch apa...@gagravarr.org wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Joe Witt wrote: Can I please have access to edit the wiki? I'd like to submit a project proposal. Karma granted, good luck! Nick