On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote:
There's one discussion in Kylin community about to add binary
package in release, people are really would like to have one:
Was the potential trademark conflict discussed somewhere? See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201212.mbox/%3c50ca29ad.6000...@apache.org%3E-
if so, just linking to the discussion is fine.
Kalle
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Joachim Dreimann
Also - there's a fairly new startup in San Francisco area going by the same
name Bloodhound (see http://bloodhound.com/). I'm not associated with them,
just happened to hear about them. It's obviously not in the same business
but given how Apache projects have traditionally been rather cautious
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:02 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
is this the only concern or are there any other objections that will only
be checked in the next round?
A vote is a vote. You can express general concerns but if nobody's
voting against, take the comments and
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
I fear we are miscommunicating again.
Only the copyright owner is allowed to (re)move copyright notices
or permit others to (re)move them on the owner's behalf.
Interesting, why is that? Is it so by the law?
Kalle
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
I think the Trac community sees this as a zero-sum game: if people are
contributing to Bloodhound, they *aren't* contributing to Trac.
Instead, we should try to convince the Bloodhound people that our
philosophy is
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012 1:28 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
So the generic policy is there is no generic policy, and instead
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. That is/was my read, too.
Even still, companies don't participate in ASF projects, individuals
do. To me, the proposal implies Adobe is a participating entity. The
sentence in question would read better as To that end,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 November 2011 14:32, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 15/11/11 03:22, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 November 2011 02:12, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
But yes, I agree that using kill search is probably a bad idea.
What podlings needs to do is essentially fact finding (not
interpretation). Perhaps someone could
2011/8/11 seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com:
I have updated the Proposal to be more clear on the external dependencies
and possibilities to move away from them:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal#External_Dependencies
From the sidelines, WebSockets would seem like
Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
could start as the TLP and later become a sub project once other tools
graduate and join Apache Tools as sub projects. Makes sense to me as
there are a lot
+1 (non-binding) for the retirement proposal.
Chen, the vote has nothing to do with whether you manage to release
the 4th version or not, and the failure to see that and the failure to
understand what Apache and the incubator is about is a testament to
why the project should be retired, in my
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:47, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I haven't followed this particular issue because it seems like a
slamdunk easy thing. If the podling wants to change their name, then
fine. Sounds
-0.5 (non-binding), I find the proposed name rather confusing
Kalle
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
Bergman
Non-binding vote:
David Jencks
Thank you all, we'll take the result to the Board!
Kalle
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
project is ready to graduate and is asking
:29 AM, sebb wrote:
On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation
to present the project resolution to the board. The community
with Stefano there: I do contest the view that svn is the
release, but let's leave that for another thread. I'm watching the
issue and perhaps I'll restore the LICENSE file on top of the tree.
Kalle
On Aug 16, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, sebb seb
PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:09 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dunno if it's exactly documentation but see this from Roy Fielding
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26
of
The Apache Shiro Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The
Apache Shiro Project:
* Les Hazlewood (lhazlew...@apache.org)
* Kalle Korhonen (kao...@apache.org)
* Peter Ledbrook (pledbr
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the incubation stages don't seem to have been completed, at
least according to the page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/shiro.html
Perhaps
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, just noticed that the SVN tree does not appear to have a copy of
the LICENSE file.
Normally this is stored alongside the NOTICE file at the top-level, i.e. in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/trunk/
Looks like
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Your head is in the sand. The Incubator is a broken process. Everybody
hates it. Everybody wants to get out of it. Subversion was fortunate
in that we had enough support to bully our way through, to route
around damage, and to
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Otherwise we assume the release would have been voted against.
The lack of a DISCLAIMER was reported as part of the vote.
I don't know why it was not considered blocking.
Vote closed and passed, lazy consensus.
Binding votes:
+1 Ant Elder
Non-binding votes:
+1 Gerolf Seitz
Thank you all. Release promoted, announcements to follow.
Kalle
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the NL files in the root
of the archive:
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content.
NOTICE and NOTICE.txt have significantly different content.
LICENSE and NOTICE are not in SVN as
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. This
is a lazy consensus vote as we already received 3 binding
a committer in the same project) is
part of the incubator group. Can somebody add me back in?
Thanks,
Kalle Korhonen (kaosko)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:30 PM
Subject: Permission issue writing to /www
Noel J. Bergman kindly added me back to the group (thanks!), all good now.
Kalle
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, my username kaosko has been removed from incubator group
for some reason. I'm a committer in Shiro project, currently
+1 Apache Shiro
Kalle
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
This is the final vote for the Apache JSecurity/Ki project's new name
between the two proposed finalists. Please vote for only one of the
following two (alphabetically-ordered) names:
31 matches
Mail list logo
