On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> Incubator community,
>
> I have tendered my resignation as VP, Incubator. The PMC has recommend
> Marvin Humphrey as my successor in a motion submitted to the
> Foundation board for consideration at the meeting next week.
I was a pleasure w
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Please VOTE to graduate Apache Mesos from the Incubator. Though
> only Incubator PMC member VOTEs are binding, all are welcome to
> voice your opinion. I'll leave the VOTE open for at least 72 hours,
> and hopefully can get enough
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (398J)
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for the acceptance of Apache HotdoG into the
> Incubator. I'll leave the VOTE open for the rest of the week and close it out
> Monday, June 17th early am PT.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Apache HotdoG into th
Extremely enthusiastic +1!!!
If you ever need help with mentorship -- please let me know.
Also, looking forward to seeing this in Bigtop!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm pleased to bring you a proposal to the Apache Incubator
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rebecca Wood wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The vote will close on Monday, April 29, 2013.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't accept jcl
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> One alternative to going for full-on majority voting is to recognize that a
> larger group is much more likely to have "noisy vetoes" by requiring that
> successful votes have n positive votes and m negative votes subject to some
> condition on
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> We have not found a consens, but one might highlight Roy Fieldings e-mail:
> http://s.apache.org/royCommitterVeto
>
> I still think like Joe and feel that consensus should not apply in the
> IPMC. We are way to different to normal PMCs.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> I fully agree. I had a chance also to look at the proposal closely, so will
> +1 if the
> vote is re-opened, but I see no need for it. Its in the hands of competent
> mentors
> and the podling is ready to get on board.
+1 to that! 'Keep cal
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh
wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> Is there a concern with the current name? The closest is a tool for
> Information Retrieval. Not sure if there is an overlap. We will also bring
> this up with the champion and mentors to see if this needs to be vet with
+1 (binding)
I've been keeping a bit of an eye on that community and FWIW
I think they are in a reasonable shape.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> At least
>> in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined
>> bundle for the checksums.
>
>
> Have you l
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
>> separate files for each hash type.
>> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>>
>
> In what way are they "wrong?" It i
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Provisionr into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> The vote will close on March 8.
>
> [] +1 Accept Provisionr into the Apache incubator
> [] +0 Don't care.
> [] -1 Don't accept Provisionr into the
+1 (binding).
I would also encourage you guys to take a look at Apache Bigtop
as a way of integrating with the rest of Hadoop ecosystem and
bring more testing into the fold.
Looking forward to working with you!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Does this need to go to general@hadoop and not general@incubator?
Yes it does :-( My major apologies -- writing from ApacheCON in a very mobile
environment.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
Hi!
for the past couple of releases of Hadoop 2.X code line the issue
of integration between Hadoop and its downstream projects has
become quite a thorny issue. The poster child here is Oozie, where
every release of Hadoop 2.X seems to be breaking the compatibility
in various unpredictable ways. A
Hi!
I didn't get the usual memo -- is this expected?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> This is a call to graduate the Apache Crunch podling from Apache Incubator.
>>
>> Apache Crunch entered the Incubator in May of 2012. We have made
>> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache. We have
>> ten committe
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that icons, gifs, jpgs are ok in both source and binary
> dists. My mental model for source dists is whether the file can do any harm
> and what the developer would do to verify its safety. For icons, gifs,
> jpgs, I would load
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Right now, a shepherd assignment is a temporary job. It starts as the
> reports for a cycle begin to come in, and it ends when the shepherd
> feels that he or she has done what makes sense in terms of reporting
> to the community and, in s
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Just think about this for a second, what's more
> likely for people to start suing us over, some
> bug in the NOTICE file or an undetected backdoor
> in one of our programs? I am personally far more
> concerned about the current state of the
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> What do people think of making the podling reporting deadline be a
> full week before the board's deadline?
I think this would be extremely helpful.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To
Hi!
the project appears to be in a reasonable shape. The only
oddity is that none of the mentors have signed off on the
January 2013 report. I'll try to ping them off-list.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Hello Roman,
>
> Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple
> of weeks.
> After Luciano stepped down as a mentor some time ago, we are still one mentor
> short.
> Would you consider becoming one, so we h
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Roman Shaposhnik: cTakes, S4
I really liked what I saw in cTakes -- from my observations they
could well be on the graduation trajectory.
S4 didn't post anything -- I'm following up.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Roman, there's still no web page even for minimal project status for
> Hadoop Development Tools. It would be nice for that to come up (as
> well as a december report).
I'm working with the podding on this.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Releases and new committers are pretty much the only time I'd expect to see
> votes in an Apache community.
Understood. My question was specifically about the
process used by ASF to manage its "top level" web
pages. Now I know.
Thanks,
Roma
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
> I am +1 on suggesting (on that page) a 'normal' form for
> the content of a .md5 file.
I'll take a crack at it now that I know where the source is ;-)
> I am definitedly -1 on removing the gpg line above, or
> suggesting that only
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ||| Hi all,
> |||
> ||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
> ||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
> ||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the requi
ote
> to modify the content of:
>http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#md5
>
> Or even more basic question -- where's the source for that
> webpage?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shap
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
> have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use different
> formats, I personally don't see this as a show stopper for our current
> release..
>
> C
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Personally, I find it difficult to verify the GPG generated checksums.
>
> Ditto. It's particularly awkward when the hash is wrapped over several lines.
>
> I ended up writing a Perl script to handle all the variations.
>
>> If I'm not alone perhaps
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, permit me to ask another, related, question. It seems to me that
> the IPMC is concerned with the fact that a project is ready to leave,
> but not so much which where it is going. A proposal to form a new TLP
> is, I think, a straightf
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>
> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
And this is the crux of the question -- what IS suitable format?
Perso
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> What does gpg --verify do?
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
It verifies the GPG sig (as it should). I wasn't able to
find (well, by spending 2 minutes searching through
the man page on my Linux) an easy way to ask it
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (u
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Droids seems to be a really easy shepherding assignment. They are on
> the watch list for low activity, they are self-aware of this, and they
> are having a conversation with the commons TLP about perhaps becoming
> a component there. I do
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Furthermore, I have created a exclude file for RAT which excludes these
> files. I still have to add it to SVN though..
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Benson / Jukka -
>
> I'm waiting for my shepherd assignments.
If there are any reports that need reviewing -- count me in!
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. I've added my name to the shepherd wiki page
-
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am submitting a proposal that has been open for discussion for some
> days (with the former name of Mayhem), so now submitting for a vote
> for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
>
> Vote will b
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into the release!
>
>
>> -1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
>> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
>> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Here's what I would like to s
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Trademarks are fundamentally about consumers - not about the project leaders
> or committers.
At the risk of stating the obvious, this also points to a
"Googleability of a name"
issue (although with Apache prefix this is typically less of a c
||| Hi all,
|||
||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
||| files into the correct place etc.
|||
||| The source release file and signatu
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Yes, the 11 components are unrelated, but I just find the release process
> such a pain that I fear to go to independent lifecycle.
I think the real question is whether you'd expect different sub-communities
of developers tending to them, or w
rces ===
> * Jenkins/Hudson for builds and test running.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Adam Berry (amberry at yahoo-inc dot com)
> * Jeffrey Zemerick (jeffrrey at mtnfog dot com)
> * Evert Lammert
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I want to thank all of you for the vote(s) of confidence in recommending me
> as the IPMC chair. While it's always possible that the Board will decline
> the suggestion, it doesn't seem too terribly presumptuous to start looking
> ahead.
>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> The key id (EB686AF9) is not available from the standard PGP servers.
>>
>
> I've added the key to the pgp keyserver (http://keyserver.pgp.com/) when I
> created it. Searching via the key shows me the correct entry. Is ther
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add Roman Shaposhnik to our ranks.
>
> Welcome, Roman! Feel free to say a bit about yourself.
Thanks Chris!
I'm extremely excited and honored to join the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Adam Berry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Below is a proposal for a new incubator project. This idea came out of and
> had strong support on
> the general hadoop list, see the thread at
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201209.mbox/browser.
>
> We ar
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
> voting +1 on a release without doing appropriate due diligence.
If that's the easiest practical r
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> You go and help the community out in general and, when it comes time
> for a release, you do all the things a regular mentor would do. If
> you catch issues with the release, this will be a big help. No one is
> going to ignore your assistan
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> I guess I would encourage you to do as Luciano suggests, and to chat to
> mentors on a project that you might help with.
Great. Lets make it practical -- there's a Helix project that is currently
being proposed for incubation. I'm very much inte
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> But great suggestion Luciano (to use all the incumbent IPMC to help more
> while experiences are fresh).
> My personal opinion is, the easiest way to look for projects needing help is
> during releases. If a project
> comes to general list w
Hi!
ever since Bigtop has incubated I've been thinking
about the experience that I've had and that it would
be very nice if I could help the new projects at least
1/10th the amount of help I received from some of the
mentors.
Also, seeing a steady stream of graduating projects
I would imagine tha
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, kishore g wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Helix for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. I have pasted the full proposal below.
+1 (not binding)
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscr
addition to that the following is the tally of non-binding votes:
7 +1 votes
Avik Dey
Suresh Marru
Jakob Homan
Edward J. Yoon
Bruno Mahé
Bhandarkar, Milind
Roman Shaposhnik
0 +0 votes
0 -1 votes
The VOTE threads for this can be found at [1].
I will proceed by
apache.org
* Stephen Chu s...@apache.org
* Bruno Mahébm...@apache.org
* Peter Linnell plinn...@apache.org
* James Page jamesp...@apache.org
* Patrick Taylor Ramsey p...@apache.org
osed board resolution below.
[1] http://s.apache.org/SGm
[2] http://s.apache.org/LOA
Thanks,
Roman Shaposhnik
X. Establish the Apache Bigtop Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation&#x
Thanks for voting. The vote passes as follows:
+1 (binding): Tom White,
Patrick Hunt
Alan Gates
+1 (non binding): Roman Shaposhnik,
Konstantin Boudnik,
Johnny
,
Patrick Hunt
+1 (non binding): Roman Shaposhnik,
Konstantin Boudnik,
Johnny Zhang,
Anatoli Fomenko,
Stephen Chu,
Bruno Mahé,
It fixes the
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> [ X] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator
non-binding
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional command
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:32:32 -0400:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>> > Note also that Infra has already been involved.
>>
>> Yup. Saw.
>
> What's the infra issue here? I see no new mentions of big
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>> The output of Apache Bigtop (incubating) can be quite unusual since it
>> is a deployable production quality big data stack.
>
> What does it take to get a product into the Bigtop stack?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>>> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
>>
>> Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pd
Hi!
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> * If the former, then each subdirectory of [1] falls fairly
>>> conveniently into the traditional concept of convenience binaries
>>> built from the source release. The only extra thing you'd need is a
>>> proper set of license metadata
Hi Jukka!
Thanks a million for chiming in.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
> * If the former, then each subdirectory of [1] falls fair
Hi Alan!
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
> Bigtop, by its nature, is different because it provides artifacts for users
> to download
> regardless of what other components they need.
> It is the difference between "we include this because we need it" and "we
> include this bec
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
>> wrote:
>>> So you are suggesting expanding the charter to include projects not hosted
>&
Greetings,
The Apache Bigtop team is pleased to announce the release of version 0.3.0
from the Apache Incubator: a first ever 100% open-source Apache Hadoop 1.0
based big data stack!
For a list of issues resolved in this version, please see
the release notes:
http://incubator.apache.org/bigtop/
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.3.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317841&projectId=12311420
&g
+1. Tried building and deploying on a couple of EC2 instances.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.3.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.
TEPS #1 and #2):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/How+to+install+Hadoop+distribution+from+Bigtop
Thanks!
Bigtop 0.3.0 release manager,
Roman Shaposhnik
bigtop.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
-
To unsub
Thanks to all who provided feedback. Looks like we don't really
have any serious blockers, but I will be respinning the RC
shortly based on the concerns so far.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the third incubator release for Apach
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 March 2012 03:10, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> 0.3.0-incubating.
>>
>> *** Please download, test, and vote by Friday, March 16
>>
>> Not
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> I have started testing this release yesterday by doing a full deployment
> / tests.
Perfect start! I'll be doing some testing in the kerberized environment
in a few days.
> But I found at least an issue I would consider a blocker for
> this RC
Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
Thanks!
Bigtop 0.3.0 release manager,
Roman Shaposhnik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-uns
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
> point me to some written docs?
AFAIK, it would be fair to say that Apache, in general, is all
about source releases. The binary artifacts
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list vote):
> Tom White
> Patrick Hunt
> Olivier Lamy (dev list vote)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has reviewed and voted!
>
> There was one note with slightly outdated ye
e a look at our
artifacts.
Thanks,
Roman (wearing his RM hat).
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Roman Shaposhnik
Date: Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2
To: bigtop-...@incubator.apache.org, Patrick Hunt
Cc: general@incubator.apache.o
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently
>> remind that, with 6 "+1" votes from the community members we
>> would be ver
------
From: Roman Shaposhnik
Date: Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2
To: bigtop-...@incubator.apache.org, Patrick Hunt
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by:
$ m
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 you need to add RAT to your pom:
> http://incubator.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/plugin-info.html
>
> I ran this and noticed a number of issues around licensing - ie
> license headers missing from files. You should clean this up before
ore
> releasing.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is the second incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> 0.2.0-incubating.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.or
This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by:
$ mvn -Prelease install
at the top level of a project. This is THE only change between RC1 and RC2
and given how cosmetic it is I'd like to think that all the existing
+1 votes don't
need to be recast. Please let me know i
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> The tag to be voted on:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.2.0-incubating-RC1/
+1
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.2.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317591&projectId=1
This is the second incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.2.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317591&projectId=12311420
*** Please download, test, and vote by Saturday, November 7
Note that we are voting on t
Hi!
I'm so used to "Submit patch" action available for TLPs such as
Hadoop/HBase/etc.
that I really would like to have something like that for Bigtop. What
does it take
to have it enabled? (I hope the answer is NOT graduating from the
incubator ;-)).
Thanks,
Roman.
--
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> imho this is a non issue for this release because:
> * A discussion has just started on bigtop-dev mailing list about that
> question.
For the benefit of those exclusively on general@incubator.apache.org: the thread
that Bruno mentioned has als
+1 Non-binding. I appreciate Eric's concerns, but we are releasing
Bigtop project here,
not the artifacts it is capable of producing. That said, settling on
an appropriate (and
configurable!) naming convention for packages would be a really high priority
for us in coming weeks.
Thanks,
Roman.
On
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be
A strong +1
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose Oozie to be an Apache Incubator project.
> Oozie is a server-based workflow scheduling and coordination system to manage
> data processing jobs for Apache Hadoop.
>
>
> Here's a l
Hi Cos,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> However, iTest repository at github.com/cloudera/iTest isn't
> available? Will it be available along with the rest of the code or it
> isn't opened to the public? A error in the document? What's the deal there? I
> believe it'd
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Andre Arcilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like my name to be added to the committer list. I am assembling and
> integration-testing Hadoop stacks at Yahoo. I look forward to participate in
> developing a community-accepted framework for packaging Hadoop components,
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>> I've added more on the limitations of the current process (not synchronised
>> releases, not enough automated testing on multiple-host clusters), and on a
>
> actually
901 - 995 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
