What about maven repos? Are those by definition not generally binary releases?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 14, 2018, at 5:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Myrle Krantz wrote on Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:24 +0100:
>> I had understood the reason that the foundation only officially supports
>> source
...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500:
On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Bertrand,
I agree. The good thing about a vibrant community is that they
generally enforce this. All I'm saying is this shouldn't be a must
requirement, rather
Yeah I agree with this. At MyFaces we typically way the 72 hours, but
for security things or master pom updates which prevent a built, we
often adopt lazy consensus type rule and fudge the timeframe with
enough community votes.
I think it's important to keep things flexible because, as much as
, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
...I think it's important to keep things flexible because, as much as we
would like everything to fit the same rules, some communities need to
be a bit more dynamic and we need
Right, for those it makes sense to me...
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
For what it's worth, I agree with you, especially for projects entering
incubator.
The IP clearance template isn't generally applicable to projects entering
the Incubator. It is for processing code grants to existing
ROTFLMHO.. So tell us how you really feel Roy. :) For what it's
worth, I agree with you, especially for projects entering incubator.
Scott
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
It's been more than the 72 hours required, so I'll go ahead and
close this thread and let the project know that the code has been
cleared for import.
regards,
-Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Oops, I forgot to include the links below. Sorry for the inconvenience.
[1] https://issues.apache.org
let me know of any issues.
Regards,
-Scott O'Bryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wessendorf wrote:
Please see also this mail:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200707.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
this group agreed on a straightforward software grant :-)
-M
On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oracle has contributed the JSF Portlet Bridge
items are under the Apache 2.0 liscence and are scheduled for
inclusion in the ASF
So my question is, do I make the updates to the ip-clearance form or do you?
Also, where do I list the initial committers to the project?
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
Lawrence Mandel wrote:
Manfred,
You need
10 matches
Mail list logo
