Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 On 2020/10/19 17:29:23, Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Incubator: > > A month ago we brought up the discussion about graduating TVM as TLP. After > great discussions in the apache way [2], > we get good support from the incubator and also get helpful feedback about > producing another release. >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 Best, Sebastian (one of the TVM mentors) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataSketches into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On 16.03.19 06:52, Sheng Wu wrote: +1 binding -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin Twitter, wusheng1108 -- Original -- From: "Paul King"; Date: Sat, Mar 16, 2019 06:47 PM To: "general"; Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

+1 (binding) On 27.02.19 23:44, Markus Weimer wrote: Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki [2]. According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new TVM project as a podling in the Apache

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

I have also volunteered as a potential mentor for the TVM project and I am very excited about it :) Best, Sebastian On 17.02.19 09:02, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: +1 binding with a caveat: You need mentors and champions from Apache who are available and ideally active in the incubator.  Markus

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

, Sebastian wrote: So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist), than they could keep using the board? That's my understanding. It applied to the ASF Slack, for example, or IRC, or other communication

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

Thank you! On 14.01.19 11:19, Matt Sicker wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Sebastian wrote: So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist), than they could keep using the board? That's my

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist), than they could keep using the board? Best, Sebastian On 14.01.19 01:14, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Jan 13, 2019, at 10:09 PM

Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

or whether they could keep it. Do we have an official stance on that? Best, Sebastian PS: As a side note, I'd like to mention that the project will have a dev@ and private@ mailinglist as usual, this question is only about the interactions with users

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

+1 (binding) tested checksums and building from source on Ubuntu 16. -s On 10.09.2018 07:41, Sergio Fernández wrote: +1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests (md5 checksums can be removed) * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix

Incubator page for MXNet

Hi, The page http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html is outdated, and we would like to update it, can anybody point me to how that works? Would it be ok to have a committer take care of that page or should we mentors do it? Best, Sebastian

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC1

+1 (binding) verified signatures and checksum, could successfully build from source on ubuntu 16 -s On 13.07.2018 05:17, Anirudh Subramanian wrote: Hi all, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release candidate RC1. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

+1 (binding) Tested checksum, signature and compilation on ubuntu 16.04. -sebastian On 22.06.2018 21:15, Anirudh wrote: Hi all, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release candidate RC0. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC3

+1 - checked signatures - checked building from source under ubuntu 16 On 19.05.2018 19:25, Hen wrote: I am only reviewing the "diff -r" between RC2 and RC3. Confirmed that the DevGuide.md is removed. There is a fix ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10837 ) to Dockerfiles,

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC3

, Sebastian On 19.05.2018 00:14, Sergio Fernández wrote: +1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * LICENSE & NOTICE files look good despite the many third-party code (CC-BY files from

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

+1 (binding) verified build from source on ubuntu 16.04 Best, Sebastian On 08.05.2018 19:36, Anirudh wrote: Hi all, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release candidate RC2. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0 release RC1

+1 (binding) On 01.12.2017 04:30, Chris Olivier wrote: +1 Additional note: This MXNet v1.0 release is planned to be announced at the NIPS conference starting Monday, 04-Dec and hence would request your support in meeting this timeline. We will continue to address any non-critical issues after

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.1 release RC0

+1 binding On 11.11.2017 07:44, Suneel Marthi wrote: +1 binding On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Meghna Baijal wrote: Hello All, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.1, release candidate 0. Apache MXNet community has voted and approved

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0 release RC0

+1 (binding) Successfully built and validated the RC from source. Best, Sebastian On 25.10.2017 03:38, Meghna Baijal wrote: Hello All, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0, release candidate 0. Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release. *Vote thread

Re: [VOTE] Do not accept software grants with conditionals or exclusions

+1 On 07.09.2017 10:32, Ted Dunning wrote: +1 On Sep 7, 2017 10:11, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: +1 (not binding, not part of IPMC) Jacques Le 07/09/2017 à 10:07, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit : Hi Incubator PMC. We recently received a software grant pointing

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

+1 (binding) On 30.08.2017 07:37, Henri Yandell wrote: +1 (binding) to the release. Minor items (fix next release): * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside of Apache). * Agreed with

Policies with respect to slack/github

such an integration? Do we know of another project, which successfully managed such a transition/integration? Best, Sebastian

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) On 17.01.2017 07:18, Henry Saputra wrote: +1 (binding) Good luck! On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: Hi Incubator folk, I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Great to see you join our efforts! On 06.01.2017 18:20, Markus Weimer wrote: On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. Awesome! If you still need a mentor, feel free to sign me up! Markus

Re: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Flink

* Robert Metzgerrmetz...@apache.org * Till Rohrmann trohrm...@apache.org * Henry Saputrahsapu...@apache.org * Sebastian Schelters...@apache.org * Kostas Tzoumasktzou...@apache.org * Timo Walther twal

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Stratosphere into the incubator

Awesome! On 04/14/2014 08:23 PM, Alan Gates wrote: The votes passes with: 8 binding +1, Sebastian Schelter, Henry Saputra, Suresh Srinivas, Till Westmann, Andrew Purtell, Owen O’Malley, Roman Shaposhnik, Jakob Homan 1 non-binding +1, Hitesh Shah no +/-0 or -1s. Congratulations to the new

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratosphere into the incubator

=== Sebastian Schelter is a committer and PMC member of Apache Mahout and Apache Giraph, member of the Apache Software Foundation, member of the Incubator PMC and project mentor for Apache Drill. Sebastian, along with our mentors, will guide the rest of the committers that have experience

Re: Joining the Incubator PMC

AFAIR any ASF member should be able to join the Incubator PMC without any problems. Maybe you could send a mail to the chair of the incubator (don't know out of my head who that is at the moment). Best, Sebastian On 04/10/2014 08:06 PM, Sean Owen wrote: Hello all, just pinging this request

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stratosphere

, and there is currently a long-term commitment to fund salaried developers for Stratosphere by public and private organizations in Europe. === Inexperience with Open Source === Sebastian Schelter is a committer and PMC member of Apache Mahout and Apache Giraph, member of the Apache Software

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stratosphere

I added you to the mentors list in the proposal. On 04/07/2014 03:47 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: Thanks Sebastian, always love to see project from academic setting to be materialized as an Apache project On Monday, April 7, 2014, Sebastian Schelter s...@apache.org wrote: You're very welcome

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stratosphere

Hi Alan, I already took the freedom to add Henry to the proposal. Btw, As I've learned that it is possible to be committer and mentor in one person, I'd also volunteer as a mentor. Best, Sebastian Am 07.04.2014 18:15 schrieb Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com: Henry, definitely glad to have you

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stratosphere

different execution engines underneath. Stratosphere would be a prime candidate for such an effort. --sebastian On 03/30/2014 09:14 AM, Alan Gates wrote: I would like to propose Stratosphere as an Apache Incubator project. I have posted the proposal to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator

Re: Mentor needs wiki permissions

Hi Nick, the username is SebastianSchelter. Thanks, Sebastian On 03/11/2014 06:20 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Ted Dunning wrote: Sebastian Schelter is a new mentor for Drill and needs wiki write permissions to sign off on monthly reports. Can somebody help by giving him

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community. On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: +1 (binding) These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a better

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

Mosharaf Chowdhury Mridul Muralidharan Nick Pentreath Andrew Xia Haoyuan Li Sandy Ryza Sebastian Schelter * Kostas Sakellis Christopher Nguyen Aaron Davidson Shivaram Venkataraman Kay Ousterhout Evan Sparks Xuefeng Wu Konstantin Boudnik Rahul Chugh Prashant Sharma Stephen Haberman Prabeesh K. Saisai

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating released!

improvements, among few new features. The full changelog is available at: http://s.apache.org/marmotta-3.1.0-changelog We invite you to join the development community. Further details at: http://marmotta.incubator.apache.org/development.html Sebastian, on behalf of the Marmotta development

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

for the next release (MARMOTTA-327). Greetings, Sebastian 2013/10/2 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org +1 sources build fine. -- Olivier On Sep 30, 2013 8:17 PM, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org wrote: Dear all, After several months of work since the last incubating release (3.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

Hi sebb, the GIT hash of the release candidate is c66a4eb5743820c89fcf0446efab60a50965c6de . I will change the build process so it includes this hash in the vote e-mail. Greetings, Sebastian 2013/10/1 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 30 September 2013 11:17, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff

[VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [4]. The vote form is included at the bottom of this mail. Greetings, Sebastian [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/5tieelmeevi2j6xb [2] http://apache.markmail.org/message/lk3hc3jutoaxp6dr [3

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

votes with +1 (mentors and ant elder) - 7 non-binding votes with +1 - 1 binding vote with not -1 from Marvin, so I count it as 0 ;-) Since the votes are all positive, we will now proceed with releasing RC8 as 3.0.0-incubating ;-) Greetings, Sebastian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

any users with legal problems ... ;-) Greetings, Sebastian 2013/4/17 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 15 April 2013 14:40, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org wrote: Dear all, Apache Marmotta is an implementation of the Linked Data Platform and accompanying services. In the last months

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

any users with legal problems ... ;-) Greetings, Sebastian 2013/4/17 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 15 April 2013 14:40, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org wrote: Dear all, Apache Marmotta is an implementation of the Linked Data Platform and accompanying services. In the last months

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

NOTICE is reserved for a certain subset of legally required notifications. :-P Thanks for checking, BTW. From your point of view, is the NOTICE and LICENSE we have for Marmotta too extensive? Where and how could it be improved? Greetings, Sebastian

[VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314321version=12323952 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. Greetings, Sebastian === A candidate for the Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

not necessarily also be Open Data, the same technology can also be used inside enterprises for information integration. In enterprises, the platform will have to fulfill many more requirements, especially regarding access control. Greetings, Sebastian -- | Dr. Sebastian Schaffert

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org Sebastian -- | Dr. Sebastian Schaffert sebastian.schaff...@salzburgresearch.at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

, Sebastian Am 18.11.2012 um 21:55 schrieb Ted Dunning: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Paolo Castagna castagna.li...@gmail.comwrote: On 17/11/12 22:49, Ted Dunning wrote: Frankly, the phrase linked data is also so generic as to be essentially meaningless outside your community

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Marmotta (was: Apache Linda)

easy branding with images and logos. What do you think? Greetings, Sebastian Am 19.11.2012 um 09:01 schrieb Sebastian Schaffert: Hi Ted, I read all your mail ( :-) ) and I am sorry that this evolved into such a discussion. For me, Linked Data is as specific as Web, Stack or Heap, and I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

to manage ;-) ). In case the Incubator PMC still recommends to rename the project, I agree we should do it BEFORE starting up the project. We will discuss options for renaming on Monday (European Time) and come up with suggestions. Greetings, Sebastian -- | Dr. Sebastian Schaffert

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

on Monday. I am also grateful for the proposals that have already been done on the list. Greetings, Sebastian Am 17.11.2012 um 23:49 schrieb Ted Dunning: Frankly, the phrase linked data is also so generic as to be essentially meaningless outside your community. There are many, many uses

[PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

Linked Data scenarios, providing facilities to deal with different data sources and requirements (small data/big data, open access/restricted access, etc). We are looking forward to your feedback and suggestions on how to improve the proposal and idea! Sergio, Thomas, Jakob and Sebastian

Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating released

We are happy to announce Version 2.0 of Apache OpenMeetings Incubating! Apache OpenMeetings provides video conferencing, instant messaging, white board, collaborative document editing and other groupware tools using API functions of the Red5 Streaming Server for Remoting and Streaming. This is

Re: Hibernate migration strategy Was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] OpenMeetings

. thanks, sebastian 2009/11/19 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org Jay points out an important design feature, in that if you write to the JPA 1.0 or 2.0 spec API and don't use any provider specific extensions or behaviors, then you can easily allow your users to choose a different provider (based

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

. But anyway, we use Red5 just like a Library, we don't modify Red5-Code. We use the API that it provides to connect to the clients and the other way round. sebastian 2009/10/28 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote: Also

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

a general Issue? For running the application we also use hibernate. Spring, Apache Batik and Apache Mina are also used, but these are all already Apache Licenses projects. Hibernate is LGPL. Is this a conflict? sebastian 2009/10/28 Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org On 10/28/2009 08:19 AM, Alexei

[PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

. It already uses many of Apache Technologies like Tomcat, Mina, Velocity, Commons, ... You may find all existing documents and further material on the GoogleCode pages: http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/ We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal. sebastian wagner -- Sebastian