Re: Reuse Maven repository more

On Friday 30 September 2016, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > 28. 9. 2016 v 11:25, Greg Stein >: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach < > jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > >> ... > > > >> One idea that

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

+1 from me as maven PMC member and as one of the contributors to the code base (all 7 commits worth iirc ;-) ) On Wednesday 28 September 2016, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven > Artifact Resolver to fix a

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiasting) On Tuesday 27 September 2016, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wednesday 25 November 2015, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 22 Nov 2015, at 22:34, Branko Čibej > > wrote: > > > > > > The major question here, for me, is: if the project is RTC, then why > > would I make an effort to become a committer

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wednesday 25 November 2015, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 22 Nov 2015, at 22:34, Branko Čibej > > wrote: > > > > > > The major question here, for me, is: if the project is RTC, then why > > would I make an effort to become a committer

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

Spoilsport ;-) On 25 November 2015 at 16:47, Upayavira wrote: > Not replying to this mail specifically, but to the thread in general... > > People keep using the terms RTC and CTR as if we all mean the same > thing. Please don't. If you must use these terms, please define what

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

t > what they don't like. It's not always possible so occasional reverts are > likely, but you shouldn't be seeing lots of reverts. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ____ > From: Stephen Connolly<mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > Sent: ‎11

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On 18 November 2015 at 14:24, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 18/11/15 14:34, Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connoll

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss the 72h lazy consensus voting (with an assumed +1 absence any votes cast) that most CTR projects operate under... and thus it can also be very easy to miss the fact that there are reviews going on (and I am being generous here, I

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wednesday 18 November 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss the 72h > > lazy consensus voting (with an assumed +1 absence any votes cast

Re: apache binary distributions

clarifications? On 25 August 2015 at 11:52, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: But I am still awaiting guidance from brand on whether a technical name usage - e.g. installer package name

Re: apache binary distributions

be to make our software available easily in different packaging systems. The pmc may want to take ownership of popular packaging systems, so we'd need to be able to trump others On Wed 19 Aug 2015 at 10:27, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: I might add also that our integration tests

Re: apache binary distributions

. The installer's first screen says clearly that this is microsoft's build of Apache maven and our marks are ack on the first screen. Is that ok? On Wed 19 Aug 2015 at 10:03, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps, the maven pmc could decree: if you are making a convenience installer

Re: apache binary distributions

the version number is different if patches have been applied. Would that be an acceptable defence of our mark? On Wed 19 Aug 2015 at 09:46, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 02:47 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:40 AM

Re: apache binary distributions

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 02:47 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Yes that was my analysis of the question: If I decide to produce an unofficial binary release of Maven without the approval

Re: apache binary distributions

On 18 August 2015 at 18:35, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: Marvin's comprehensive response is very helpful. However, the first described case is about a third-party distribution of binaries, even though some or all of the third parties are participants on the project. (I

Re: apache binary distributions

On 17 August 2015 at 09:53, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote: Am 17.08.2015 10:45, schrieb Branko Čibej: [...] So wait ... If the Subversion PMC releases source, and, say, Debian creates a binary package called 'subversion-x.y.z' ... you're saying that's trademark infringement and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 19 March 2015 at 06:55, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/KWE I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at:

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

in preparing and doing such an import. Our own timelines for Maven's switch may not align with the Groovy incubation timelines... (mind you we are all at the grace of Ben for getting our timeline for the second export he committed to the Maven project) On 16 March 2015 at 09:49, Stephen Connolly

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

On 16 March 2015 at 09:58, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 16/03/2015 09:53, Stephen Connolly wrote: Arg! hit send too soon. You should really check in with Hervé to confirm that Groovy was in the export. I am 99% confident that your issues and comments are in the XML dump

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

-16 10:08 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com : On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote: Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira: When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues are *included* in that? I.e. there’s not so much for you to worry about here? Upayavira

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote: Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira: When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues are *included

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

On Saturday, March 14, 2015, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:13, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org javascript:; wrote: Am 13.03.2015 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly: (Disclosure Ben works for my employers, so I have slightly more ability to bend

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

(Disclosure Ben works for my employers, so I have slightly more ability to bend his ear. As a result I got him to agree to do two full exports from JIRA, one to let us test the process and a second when we are ready to migrate) On 13 March 2015 at 21:37, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

We @ Maven will have a full dump of the Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set up to test migration... On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Cédric Champeau cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote: Yes the biggest problem is going to be the migration of JIRA. Codehaus only wants to provide a CSV export which is far

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

On 13 March 2015 at 10:50, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: I have been reading this thread via GMane with some worry. I have now joined the email list and this post is fortuitous in that it allows me to make some of the points I wish to contribute. On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 08:55

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

If there have been over 200 contributors to the project, I would expect to see an effort to pull some of them in shortly after entering incubation... Assuming they can demonstrate merrit. An initial committer list of 5 for such a big project with a large and diverse history of contributions would

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE Role Models

All, It would be great if we could get a resolution on some of the JIRA's in legal, e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-27 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-31 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-136 Legal-discuss,

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

well that type of lazy majority is really a majority of binding votes cast with a quorum which differs from majority of binding votes cast, majority of votes cast and quorum (i.e. the needs 3x+1 to release... because remember you cannot veto releases ;-) though only a fool of a release manager

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

On 17 October 2013 06:46, Vinayak Borkar vinay...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Marvin, Thanks for your email. I was unaware that votes are allowed to take a long time. My understanding (albeit flawed, I guess) was that votes are allowed to be outstanding for only 72 hours. Hence my email. My

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

Why not try Celtic mythology I was thinking Apache Nechtan due to the association with access to knowledge and floods... but heck I am not good on my Irish mythology and the Norse ones always sounded way cooler On 25 September 2013 13:23, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

This is interesting to me, not sure if I have the time to help much, but I should be able to find some excuses to let my employers help fund (by letting me use work time) work on this! On 17 September 2013 11:21, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Dear ASF members, I would like

Re: Looking for a Champion

There is no requirement in Jenkins to extend AbstractProject if you don't need a SCM. For example we have a number of proprietary plugins that extend from different points in the Jenkins object tree, e.g. TopLevelItem, Job, etc depending on how much code reuse is required. I am not knocking your

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

On 3 November 2012 17:22, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2012/11/3 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org: Hi again Mohammed, one think I am curious about the Git management for Mayhem is how to handle the fact that Mayhem is composed by components, like apache commons, each

Re: key signing

On 10 October 2012 15:20, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Can you clarify? I understand that being able to speak to someone face to face, and seeing their mannerisms and expressions, allows

[ANN] Committer School for people who want to become Maven Committers

Hi everyone, I just posted on my blog about an idea to get some more committers involved in the Maven project: http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html If you are interested sign up. Also please consider tweeting, google+ing, facebooking, etc so we

[ANN] JSZip Maven Plugin 0.1-alpha-1 released

Hi everyone, So I have been working on my view of what JavaScript based web application development should be like with Maven, to that end I have created the JSZip set of projects. The first semi-ready piece of work from that set of projects is the JSZip Maven Plugin. This is very early code,

Re: [ANN] JSZip Maven Plugin 0.1-alpha-1 released

Doeth: http://jszip.org On 1 June 2012 10:13, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, So I have been working on my view of what JavaScript based web application development should be like with Maven, to that end I have created the JSZip set of projects

Re: [mojo-user] [ANN] JSZip Maven Plugin 0.1-alpha-1 released

On 1 June 2012 15:19, Christopher Hunt hu...@internode.on.net wrote: Hi Stephen, Not sure if you know, but the JS Import project (1) can already utilise zip files with a www classifier. The regular Assembly plugin can be used to make these packages. The following type of dependency

Re: [jszip-dev] Re: [mojo-user] [ANN] JSZip Maven Plugin 0.1-alpha-1 released

Yes, though jars don't work as well for packaging... let's drop the other mailing lists (left on BCC to let them know they are being dropped ;-) ) and move to just jszip-...@googlegroups.com On 1 June 2012 15:24, LeClaire Garvin garvin.lecla...@gmail.com wrote: I think there is also some overlap

Re: Question RE a non-ASF hosted project requiring contributors to have a signed ICLA submitted to the ASF

On 21 April 2012 10:32, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: PS: whoever does some builds with maven and has JavaScript in those projects should take a peek at jszip.org. It's really a nice project! Thanks, great praise given that I only have the dynamic cross-reactor classpath reloading

Question RE a non-ASF hosted project requiring contributors to have a signed ICLA submitted to the ASF

Bertrand suggested to send this question here. I have a non-ASF hosted project (jszip.org hosted on github in case you are interested), which I am hoping to build enough of a developer community (currently it is just me) around to be able to bring it into the ASF. To this end, I am licensing it