[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1-incubating

2016-07-07 Thread Steve Varnau
I am pleased to announce release of Apache Trafodion 2.0.1-incubating. This is a small patch release based on 2.0.0-incubating, which adds convenience binaries for client-side tools. Detailed release notes are available at: http://trafodion.incubator.apache.org/release-notes-2-0-1.html

[VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

2016-06-10 Thread Steve Varnau
Hello, This is a call to vote on the patch release 2.0.1-incubating (Release Candidate 1). The changes were small, just to address things that came up in the 2.0.0 reviews, primarily addressing the issue that prevented providing a convenience binary of the clients package. Changes since

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating

2016-06-06 Thread Steve Varnau
On behalf of the Trafodion community, I'm happy to announce our second major Apache (incubating) release. Apache Trafodion (incubating) is a web-scale SQL-on-Hadoop solution enabling transactional or operational workloads on Hadoop. Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating New Features * This is the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Varnau
) release. --Steve > -Original Message- > From: Steve Varnau [mailto:steve.var...@esgyn.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 10:10 AM > To: 'general@incubator.apache.org' <general@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating) > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-06-02 Thread Steve Varnau
ttp://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ > > to also include your dist folder. > > On 1 Jun 2016 6:54 p.m., "Steve Varnau" <steve.var...@esgyn.com> wrote: > > > Justin, > > > > Thanks for clarifying the issues here. I will write JIRAs to fix the >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-06-01 Thread Steve Varnau
Justin, Thanks for clarifying the issues here. I will write JIRAs to fix the two minor issues in next release (clarify the rescinded BSD-4 clause and remove the GPL part of the dual license). Looking at the openssl issue, I want to figure out why we are statically linking the libraries. If

[VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-05-31 Thread Steve Varnau
Hello, This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating (Release Candidate 3). The trafodion community has approved RC3 for release. Vote result: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-trafodion-dev/201605.mb

RE: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

2016-05-18 Thread Steve Varnau
Infra can configure the github to mailing list & github to JIRA for you. In trafodion, we have all github PR and comments going to a codereview mail list http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-trafodion-codereview/ So there is a catch-all, even if the PR title is not in the correct

RE: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

2016-03-07 Thread Steve Varnau
> -Original Message- > From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 2:10 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF > > HI, > > Current recommendation is not to include it [1] but it’s not an error to > do so.

RE: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

2016-03-07 Thread Steve Varnau
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF > > On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote: > > >As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period.

LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

2016-03-07 Thread Steve Varnau
Hi, I’m compiling information for LICENSE file for a binary distribution. We (Trafodion) have a bundled dependency that is Apache-2.0 license, but not part of ASF. Do we need to call these out in the license file, or only call out the things that are non-Apache-2.0? Thanks, --Steve

RE: License statement third party modified code

2016-02-19 Thread Steve Varnau
y modified code > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Steve Varnau <steve.var...@esgyn.com> > wrote: > > > I did not see any responses in the past week on the general list. Is > > there > > another place I should ask this question? > > This was a good list to ask

RE: License statement third party modified code

2016-02-18 Thread Steve Varnau
Hi, I did not see any responses in the past week on the general list. Is there another place I should ask this question? --Steve *From:* Steve Varnau [mailto:steve.var...@esgyn.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:15 AM *To:* 'general@incubator.apache.org' <gene

License statement third party modified code

2016-02-11 Thread Steve Varnau
Hello, Instructions on the website regarding source headers: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Gives instructions for “Treatment of third-party works”. Point five says: Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis by