On 14 September 2012 13:57, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
The most useful file containing the project classpath is only formatted
automatically, it cannot be generated without project-specific knowledge.
There is no techical problem to drop these files, yet developers who
On 14 September 2012 17:53, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone seriously believe that IP notices are required in files like
these?
These files cannot be copyrighted because they do not have any
'creative' content. If they can't be copyrighted, they can't be
licensed.
On 17 September 2012 23:36, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
crossley wrote:
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/history/current.txt
Thanks for keeping that file up to date! The graph at
http://incubator.apache.org/history/ is quite useful.
On 12 September 2012 17:08, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator
The Apache Bigtop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have grown the community in users and contributors, and we've made
On 11 September 2012 16:55, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
A slight correction below-- Matthias is not on the Crunch PPMC, and so his
+1 vote should have been marked as non-binding. Apologies.
AIUI only Incubator PMC (IPMC) member votes are binding for release votes.
IMO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13440563#comment-13440563
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-125:
Very useful.
compiled package = binary package
would
On 18 August 2012 13:24, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating). This will be the second incubator release for
Apache OpenOffice after the 3.4 release with already more than 11 million
On 21 August 2012 14:38, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think
On 18 August 2012 18:20, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
situation.
Done.
Please note that manually updated directories and files under
dist/incubator (and site files) should always have group = incubator
and should be group-writable.
[If the podling is using svnpubsub then the rules are different; owner
= group = svnwc and it does not have to be group writable]
not exclusively).
The phrase needs to mention the other data that is involved.
Sound better?
sebb wrote:
At first glance, with the previous version in mind, it seems better.
But when re-read in isolation the phrase implies to me that only RDF
data is involved.
==
Not sure how well known RDF
On 17 August 2012 10:29, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that manually updated directories and files under
dist/incubator (and site files) should always have group = incubator
and should be group-writable.
[If the podling is using svnpubsub then the rules are different; owner
On 16 August 2012 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
We have already called and completed a community VOTE with the Any23
community and the Tika PMC and they have positively recommended Any23's
graduation from the Incubator.
According to the
On 16 August 2012 17:42, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Sebb,
On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:32 AM, sebb wrote:
On 16 August 2012 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
We have already called and completed a community VOTE
On 16 August 2012 18:55, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Sebb,
On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:47 AM, sebb wrote:
X. Establish the Apache Any23 Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent
I was unable to SVN update the dist area on minotaur.
Last successful update was by crossley - maybe it will work for you?
If not, infra will probably need to run a cleanup.
On 17 August 2012 01:48, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Fri Aug 17 00:48:50 2012
New Revision: 1374118
On 13 August 2012 03:07, cross...@apache.org wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Mon Aug 13 02:07:22 2012
New Revision: 1372240
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1372240view=rev
Log:
AWF is retiring.
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
Modified:
On 12 August 2012 11:20, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need
3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1
On 11 August 2012 00:12, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
policies
On 14 August 2012 02:40, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Mon Aug 13 02:07:22 2012
New Revision: 1372240
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1372240view=rev
Log:
AWF is retiring.
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content
On 14 August 2012 03:55, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Alan, thanks for updating Oozie status page.
Sebb, Bertrand, does the updated status page address your concerns?
Yes, thanks.
Regarding Bertrand suggestion about leaving an Apache member on the
PMC, We was not aware
On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3
+1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes
from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
The vote
On 11 August 2012 00:12, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
policies
On 27 July 2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
I believe Bill is complaining not about the venue,
but the choice of referring to this package as
a release candidate instead of
the proposal made my Jukka includes this matter.
Le 7/27/12 11:32 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 27 July 2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
wrote:
On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
I believe Bill is complaining not about
On 11 July 2012 22:26, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one
technicality of the apache release process blocking the release
(distributing dependencies alongside source), although not a tough one.
I'll
On 7 July 2012 07:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/7 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
See release notes:
2012/7/3 seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
is this the only concern or are there any other objections that will only
be checked in the next round?
Sebastian
2012/7/3 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 3 July 2012 19:02, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Incubator
On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org
On 3 July 2012 19:02, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Incubator Members,
this is the 3th Release Candidate (the second Candidate was voted negative
by the IPMC because of missing exact JAR filenames in LICENSE file and
missing sources as ZIP not only as .tar.gz)
On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4
Vote result:
+1 (binding):
On 2 July 2012 14:42, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
The vote has already passed on direct memory dev
Or just do it every time the Incubator site is built.
There are likely to be enough changes to ensure it runs once a month.
On 29 June 2012 08:57, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Ask infra to add it as a cron task.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012, at 09:29 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 29 June 2012 08:14, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 29/06/2012 01:04, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've drafted a couple of XSLTs for this need:
Great!
2.
On 28 June 2012 13:12, twilli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: twilliams
Date: Thu Jun 28 12:12:43 2012
New Revision: 1354971
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354971view=rev
Log:
typo
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml
Modified:
On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
Results:
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
bcprov
commons-beanutils
commons-codec
commons-collections
ehcache-core
httpclient
httpcore
etc.
Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot
-jar-1.1.jar instead of activation.jar
?
Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
or Line 327 instead of For SLF4J: slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar
Thanks,
Sebastian
2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
@Sebb: Which
On 26 June 2012 16:26, Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).
This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with
+1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes
So, we
On 24 June 2012 14:11, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 6/24/12 10:46 AM, Chris Douglas a écrit :
Kevan-
Hi, jumping on this thread, because we have had similar discussions on
another incubating project I'm mentoring...
This argument is logical, but that doesn't make it
On 24 June 2012 17:30, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The NL files only apply to what is included in the release archive itself.
+1
If there are other dependencies, these can be listed in a
DEPENDENCIES or README
On 22 June 2012 01:29, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevan,
I agree that to the benefit of users, it would be reasonable for Apache
projects to include license/notice for all dependant jars (directly or
indirectly) in a release. However, this has to be done automatically by
tools, not
On 14 June 2012 17:34, Joe Stein crypt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is the first candidate for the second incubator release for
Apache Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
This release fixes the following issues
On 9 June 2012 05:54, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Jun 8 23:55:11 2012
New Revision: 1348282
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282view=rev
Log:
flume started to graduate.
oozie updated status page.
oozie news about 2
On 9 June 2012 02:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch
/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml
thanks regards,
juan pablo
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpa...@apache.org
Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: DOAP file for Apache JSPWiki (incubating)
To: sebb
On 12 June 2012 19:16, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
@sebb: yes, the asfext:pmc entry is corrected
Could you change the name entry as follows please:
nameApache JSPWiki (incubating)/name
I know SIS and Stanbol don't do this currently, but those ought
OK, added to files.xml
On 12 June 2012 19:32, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
done, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:26 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 June 2012 19:16, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
@sebb: yes
On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
but the generated html is gone on the server.
Perhaps Robert deleted it
On 11 June 2012 11:52, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
but the generated html
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan/src/main
Those RAT files have not been updated since 2008.
On 11 June 2012 21:18, Robert Burrell Donkin rdon...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/11/12 15:17, sebb wrote:
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan
On 9 June 2012 15:36, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Oozie team is pleased to announce the release of Oozie
3.2.0 from the Apache Incubator.
Please include a brief synopsis (1 or 2 sentences) of what Oozie is in
all announcements sent outside the Oozie mailing lists.
The
As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
The CMS bookmark allows direct edit via the copy at
http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml
So is the Wiki page still necessary?
Thoughts?
On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch:
Clutch based everything on the presence
On 9 June 2012 00:55, cross...@apache.org wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Jun 8 23:55:11 2012
New Revision: 1348282
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282view=rev
Log:
flume started to graduate.
oozie updated status page.
oozie news about 2 new committers.
Modified:
On 6 June 2012 05:05, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
V3 of the interface:
https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq
https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq/incubator
Key changes:
1) initially start out with two moderator input fields, both marked as
required.
2) a
On 7 June 2012 02:39, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
There was an old conversation about this around 2011-10-10, e.g.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/31601/focus=31662
suggesting an optional resourceAlias
On 31 May 2012 13:58, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Sweet.
It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing
TLPs / podlings.
Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are
being created as part of TLP/podling creation.
Even for
On 14 May 2012 08:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/05/2012 01:03, sebb wrote:
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created
On 14 May 2012 19:45, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in NOTICE and
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts
up
for a vote:
SVN source tag ( r1335495
On 10 May 2012 06:05, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:
* The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent
code
When adding users to podlings in asf-authorization-template, please
remember to update the incubator unix group as well, otherwise the
users can have problems with some parts of SVN or updating the site.
The following were added to podlings but not the incubator group:
bloodhound: hwright
On 9 May 2012 23:39, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the command to fix this:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=hwright,ssc
Done, thanks!
Thanks!
IIUC this only happens with existing Apache
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
1.0.0-RC1-incubating from
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread
On 8 May 2012 23:22, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
Seeing INFRA-4767 ...
Need to update the website
1) List of VPs
Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html
using the CMS application, or update:
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
There must be an
On 1 May 2012 14:54, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Airavata, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.2-incubating.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have
received 2 binding Mentors/IPMC +1 votes during
On 21 April 2012 16:24, LEE CL zonlee...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, i want to subscribe Apache VCL mailing list for my final year project.
for solving my problem on VCL configuration. Lee
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=apache+VCL+mailing+list
On 8 April 2012 23:48, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Thanks so much for taking a look! Responses inline.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:22 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Please vote on releasing
On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for
Mesos in Apache, but the fifth release candidate.
Vote thread on
On 4 April 2012 02:09, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360
*** Please download, test and vote
On 4 April 2012 15:33, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0
, but that
would be a huge inconvenience for a lot of people.
Karl
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2012 16:36, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
Date
don't believe it is wise or feasible to
withhold ManifoldCF from the community.
As Sebb points out, you really, really, must not push your modified
binaries to maven central unless you use shade or equivalent to change
the package names.
I would never do that, obviously.
I wish
On 2 April 2012 20:27, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Greets,
I'm having difficulty following through on this directive:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#transfer
3. Delete the podling website from /www/incubator.apache.org on
people.apache.org.
I can't
, because I'd could imagine some
objections based on recent email.
In the longer term, if ManifoldCF really wants to include an XML
parser with a difference, then it's certainly possible for you to
maintain and release a fork of Xerces under your own package names. I
agree with Sebb that you would
be certain that the non-standard jars will not interfere with
the standard jars?
Karl
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2012 22:45, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the bigger picture here is that resolving differences of this
kind requires time
On 3 April 2012 00:48, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[dropped infrastructure@]
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:43 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be certain that the non-standard jars will not interfere with
the standard jars?
ManifoldCF is a standalone application
On 30 March 2012 17:38, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem
On 29 March 2012 15:09, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I
understand his
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include
the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of our LICENSE files (alongside a more
permissive license), but
On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Incubator IPMC,
Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0.
This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection.
You can find the artifact at
On 26 March 2012 16:20, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Incubator IPMC,
Please vote
On 26 March 2012 17:51, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
For projects who have settled on a permanent
name, some things might be better. But this
does not make life easier for the project nor
infra
On 11 March 2012 03:10, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.3.0-incubating.
*** Please download, test, and vote by Friday, March 16
Note that we are voting on the source (tag): release-0.3.0-incubating-RC0
Source tarball,
On 9 March 2012 05:42, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:43:47AM +0200, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org
wrote:
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1393#comment-1393
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-122:
These were deliberately left as a reminder that other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1397#comment-1397
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-123:
Surely this should be raised against HAMA
On 1 March 2012 14:39, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
OK http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ is up.
All we need to do at this point is migrate site-author/
to content/ and flip on svnpubsub for production.
Any takers?
OK, I'm happy to do the SVN and build.xml changes.
Just to
On 1 March 2012 20:44, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1, thanks sebb!
[Top -posting?]
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: CMS! Re
In preparation for moving the Incubator site to svnpubsub, the SVN
source for the site, i.e. site-author/, has been renamed to content/
The site Ant build and clutch still work as before.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 27 February 2012 03:01, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
sebb wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:17:15 +:
On 26 February 2012 18:39, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Andy Seaborne wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 17:37:49 +:
3/
[[
Often symbolic links
On 26 February 2012 15:41, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
sebb,
What I'm trying to get to at the moment is something that enables a release
of TDB and we can apply to next module.
jena is a number of modules, we have released 3 (5 actually - 2 are the
parent POM and the distribution
On 26 February 2012 16:03, Robert Burrell Donkin rdon...@apache.org wrote:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
See [2] for a draft of the
On 26 February 2012 18:39, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Andy Seaborne wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 17:37:49 +:
3/
[[
Often symbolic links are created from the root of the project
distribution directory to the latest version of each release. This
allows scripts or users
On 24 February 2012 12:11, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
We distribute through maven but also many of our users are not
experienced
developers but students, including ones new to java.
To make it as easy as possible for this category of user, we ship a
distribution which is the
801 - 900 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
