On 18 August 2012 13:24, Andre Fischer <awf....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating). This will be the second incubator release for
> Apache OpenOffice after the 3.4 release with already more than 11 million
> downloads.
>
>
> This release candidate provides the following important key changes
> compared to the OpenOffice 3.4 release:
>
> (1) Five more translations: Finnish, British English, Khmer, Slovak, and
> Slovenian.
>
> (2) As of 2012/08/16, there were 69 verified issues that have been
>     resolved. (Complete list at http://s.apache.org/Huv)
>
> (3) Update of the NOTICE file: it now properly mentions CoinMP as numerical
> equation solver.
>
> (3) Most external source archives are now downloaded from their project
> servers.
>     For all of them exists a fallback at
> http://ooo-extras.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/.
>     The Apache SVN repository is only used as secondary fallback and
>     is not used in practice.
>     It will be removed in the next release.
>
>
> For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Release+Notes.
>
> The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary
> releases for 20 languages) and further information how to verify and
> review Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) can be found on the following
> wiki page:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOO3.4.1
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
> (incubating).

I think the NOTICE file included in the source release is wrong.
NOTICE files are for *required* notices only, and should be as short
as possible, and should only relate to software that is actually
included in the particular artifact in which they appear.

There are several repeated instances of

=======
This product includes software developed by
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
=======

There should only be one instance at the head of the file.

The Tomcat (Tomcat? is that really included?) section mentions NSIS -
is that really included?

There are lots of other entries which look superfluous.
It's vital that the NOTICE file only include *required* notices.

If the binary builds include additional software, then their N&L files
need to include any required references.

I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin.

> The vote starts now and will be open until:
>
>     Tuesday, August 21st: 2012-08-21 15pm UTC+2.
>
> The PPMC vote took already place on the public ooo-dev mailing list.
> There where 11 +1 votes including
>    one IPMC member binding +1,
>    10 +1 votes fro PPMC members (this includes the one IPMC member),
>    one +1 vote from a community member.
> No abstinations, no -1 votes.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201208.mbox/%3C502B8FCD.4050100%40googlemail.com%3E
>
>
> The vote will be open for 3 days.
>
>     [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
>     [ ]  0 Don't care
>     [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to