Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi! It seems that the discussion has converged and I'd like to make one extra call for volunteering mentors. Please let me know ASAP since I'd like to get the VOTE going tomorrow. Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > on behalf of

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

2016-08-25 9:02 GMT+09:00 Makoto Yui : > Just in case, I'll clarify in the goal section of our Incubation proposal: > - get I-CLA from the initial committers > - get SGA from other individuals not listed in the initial committers and > AIST. > - list all copyrights and

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Justin, Thanks. It's very helpful. Makoto 2016-08-25 9:29 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > >> BTW, do you have in mind any good example/project following the >> current ASF policy? > > I’d just follow this [1] Here’s a fictional project I've put together that > may

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi, > BTW, do you have in mind any good example/project following the > current ASF policy? I’d just follow this [1] Here’s a fictional project I've put together that may also help. [2][3] If you need help just ask your mentors or on the incubator list for help. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Justin, Okey. It's to be done after entering Incubator. BTW, do you have in mind any good example/project following the current ASF policy? Thanks, Makoto 2016-08-25 9:13 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > >> Sure. I'll list all copyrights and licenses in NOTICE file

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi, > Sure. I'll list all copyrights and licenses in NOTICE file and LICENSE > file respectively, following the way in > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/NOTICE#L86 > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE#L232 Again this can be sorted out during incubation, but I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Roman, Justin, and Marvin, Thank you for the comments. I could make sure what we should do during the Incubation process for IP issues. 2016-08-24 9:52 GMT+09:00 Roman Shaposhnik : >>> There are 5 individuals, excluding project committers, sent pull requests >>> to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > >> There are 5 individuals, excluding project committers, sent pull requests >> to the project before moving to ALv2: smly, y-tag,

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > There are 5 individuals, excluding project committers, sent pull requests > to the project before moving to ALv2: smly, y-tag, ryukobayashi, > spiritloose, and takahi-i. I assume that all the "project committers" (if

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi, > I think what we have to do is listing Copyrights and Licenses in NOTICE file > as seen in > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/NOTICE#L86 > > Is my understanding right? No, that notice file is IMO a poor example to copy from. MIT and BSD licenses need to be mentioned in LICENSE

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > 2016-08-24 1:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey : >> Looking at the Github history, though, it seems that there were pull requests >> and issues file by others prior to the Mar 16, 2015

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi Marvin, 2016-08-24 1:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey : > Looking at the Github history, though, it seems that there were pull requests > and issues file by others prior to the Mar 16, 2015 relicensing. Were there > any contributions made before then by people not employed

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > I'm going to answer your two questions. > >> 1) Who were the copyright holders at the time of relicensing? > > At the time of re-licensing, the copyright holder was AIST, > my employer at that time.

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi Marvin, I'm going to answer your two questions. > 1) Who were the copyright holders at the time of relicensing? At the time of re-licensing, the copyright holder was AIST, my employer at that time. > 2) How was their permission secured? Hivemall was at that time my solo research project at

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > 2016-08-23 2:20 GMT+09:00 Roman Shaposhnik : >> Two of the areas that I'd like to explicitly solicit IPMC's opinion >> on are: >> >> 1. whether the process of re-licensing from LGPL to ALv2 >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi Roman, Thank for the comments. 2016-08-23 2:20 GMT+09:00 Roman Shaposhnik : > Two of the areas that I'd like to explicitly solicit IPMC's opinion > on are: > 1. whether the process of re-licensing from LGPL to ALv2 > was enough given the ASF's strict IP policies The

[DISCUSS] Hivemall Incubation Proposal

Hi! on behalf of the Hivemall team, I'd like to kick off a discussion thread around accepting Hivemall into and ASF Incubator. Hivemall is a library for machine learning implemented as Hive UDFs/UDAFs/UDTFs that runs on Hadoop-based d ata processing frameworks. More specifically it runs