On 6/14/12, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
moving to the Attic?
Well, let's try to solve this once and for all. Sure, Kato is not a
On Jun 14, 2012 8:46 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/14/12, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather
than
moving to the Attic?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012 8:46 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/14/12, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Kato is not an ASF project (yet),
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
moving to the Attic?
On Jun 11, 2012 6:07 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Wearing the very small hat of shepherd, I write to start a discussion
of moving Kato to the attic.
The last sign of activity
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
The three listed mentors don't have time to deal with this. I'm told
that Joe volunteered to help out here.
I'm one
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Kato to the attic?
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather
than
moving to the Attic?
On Jun 11, 2012 6:07 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Wearing the very small hat of shepherd, I write to start a discussion
of moving
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:55 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Agreed. There was some interest in Kato earlier when they finally figured
out that they don't need to wait for Oracle, but I suppose
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
moving to the Attic?
Well, let's try to solve this once and for all. Sure, Kato is not a
full-fledged ASF process Incubator-wise, but at the same time
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Gianugo Rabellino
gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
As an Attic PMC member, who is also very well aware of lack of
volunteers over there, I couldn't be happier with a policy stating
that failed incubating projects are just rm'd, but I don't think we
never came
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
I'm very tentatively proposing that the IPMC vote to shelve the
project and, if the vote succeeds, that I and any other willing
parties take care of the Attic process.
Agreed. There was some
Wearing the very small hat of shepherd, I write to start a discussion
of moving Kato to the attic.
The last sign of activity was at the last reporting period, and the
only activity then was for one contributor to note that he had really
no time to spend on the project and the future needed to be
11 matches
Mail list logo