A big +1,
I am currently using Jena as a library for semantic web related work at
WSO2. At the moment two of our middle-where products (Mashup server / Data
Services server) uses jena to query RDF data sources. I would be more than
happy to contribute to Jena, and will volunteer for any future
On 13/11/10 04:17, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html;
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a
Steve Loughran wrote:
On 13/11/10 04:17, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html;
BrowserLauncher2 could
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/bundles/tags/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.saxon-9.1.0.1_1/pom.xml?view=markup
FYI:
I've found this in Maven Central:
The author of Saxon is in a public feud with Maven. He likes to claim
that Maven publication violates his license.
If you go the route you quote, you have to publish it under your own
groupId, and not his, and not Apache's.
However, Someone published:
dependency
groupIdnet.sf.saxon/groupId
The resolver comes from here at Apache. No need to list it.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
All,
Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance
process
It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator because some o these
issues need to be satisfactorily resolved. The Jena developers are aware of
this and have undertaken to do what is required in
It's resolved as far as I am concerned, I'm just answering questions.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
All,
Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance
process
It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator
On 13/11/10 02:23, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
No I hadn't. That is very
On 13/11/10 13:32, Ross Gardler wrote:
All,
Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance
process
It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator because some o these
issues need to be satisfactorily resolved. The Jena developers are aware of
this and
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept
Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is
copied here for your convenience and can be found
On 12/11/2010 09:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept
Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is
copied here for your convenience and can be found
On 11/12/2010 3:28 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
One niggle: have you clarified somewhere that all the dependencies
licenses are Apache-compatible?
We have discussed this and the team believe they are licence
compatible. They have undertaken to remove any licence
incompatibilities during
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org]
Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sander W G van der Waal
sander.vanderw...@oucs.ox.ac.uk wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org]
Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator
I
Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal
to accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text
of the proposal is copied here for your
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html;
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a much simpler approach
(i.e. write it in a file!).
That is
CyberNeko is at least class B, since Tika uses it.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
On 11/12/2010 5:47 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CyberNeko is at least class B, since Tika uses it.
The actual requirement is for a parser that makes a reasonable job of
HTML in the wild, and implements SAX2
No particular reason for CyberNeko but it met those requirements, works,
and met our
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote:
On 11/12/2010 5:47 PM, Benson Margulies
On 11/12/2010 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
No I hadn't. That is very useful.
A first reaction, concerning the GRDDL
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html;
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a much simpler approach
(i.e. write it in
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
The question about whether Apache would like to rethink our earlier
legal advice to require click through license agreement before executing
untrusted code in a sandbox should probably go to legal-discuss@ mailing
list, - at what point in the process should I initiate
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html;
Also, this relates to the release process and publishing of artifacts
in the Maven
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/bundles/tags/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.saxon-9.1.0.1_1/pom.xml?view=markup
the other items (CyberNeko, XML Commons) may be work to find the right
links ...
Jeremy
Jeremy Carroll
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/bundles/tags/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.saxon-9.1.0.1_1/pom.xml?view=markup
It seems to me that the servicemix project, which I do not know, has its own
Maven
+1 (non-binding)
Marco
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your convenience and
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your
Big +1
- Dave
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:26 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Big +1 from me.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/8/10 6:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept
+1
On 9 Nov 2010, at 0:36 , Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
+1!
Tommaso
2010/11/9 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of
the proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal
We currently have two mentors so
This is excellent news and a good proposal. I'm a Jena user myself and
would like to volunteer as a mentor for the new podling, if an
additional hand is needed.
- Dave
On Monday, November 8, 2010, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the
On 08/11/2010 23:49, Dave wrote:
This is excellent news and a good proposal. I'm a Jena user myself and
would like to volunteer as a mentor for the new podling, if an
additional hand is needed.
I've added you as a mentor - thanks
Ross
- Dave
On Monday, November 8, 2010, Ross
On 09/11/2010 00:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
I use Jena at my day-job, so if there's a mentor shortage you can draft me.
Actual users as mentors is great news. My team uses Jena, but I myself
do not so knowledgeable mentors are important. Your on the list.
Ross
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at
I use Jena at my day-job, so if there's a mentor shortage you can draft me.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
Big +1 from me.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/8/10 6:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of
the proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be
40 matches
Mail list logo
