On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Don't we already have 3 Mentor? Any more would be counterproductive,
I think.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Don't we already have 3 Mentor? Any more would be
On Jul 3, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Don't we
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
--
Nick Kew
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Just say the word, and I'll add you to the proposed mentor list. :)
-- Leif
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Just say the word, and I'll add you to the proposed mentor
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:25 AM, jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also uses
autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also
uses autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are
included in the sources tarballs.
Cool! One more (followup) question:
We have
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Add me.
Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three mentors
that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be considered
for a vote?
I'd like to join as well.
We were looking for a mod_jk successor for a long time,
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Add me.
Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three
mentors that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be
considered for a vote?
I'd like to join as well.
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Is there anything else missing?
Nope, it looks like you have your ducks in a row! +1 from me.
Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope),I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve the
TM
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:52 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I
hope),I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve
the TM issues around Traffic Server before we do this, in case we
end up having to rename the
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:52 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope),I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve
the TM issues around Traffic Server before we do this, in case we
end up
On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also
uses autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are
included in the sources tarballs.
Cool! One more (followup) question:
We have a couple of files
Hi,
We already got two new mentors signed up (thanks to your posts to the httpd
devel list I think). So, we're up to three now, how many do we need to be
considered for a vote?
3 mentors is usually considered enough :)
Is there anything else missing?
Nope, it looks like you have your ducks
Leo Simons wrote:
Is there anything else missing?
Nope, it looks like you have your ducks in a row! +1 from me.
Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope), I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve the
TM issues around Traffic
We have a pretty well documented API for writing plugins and we are
trying to push new features into plugins if possible. Writing plugins
is much easier then working on the core code.
We know some people that have worked on the code base before and are
hoping they will join the effort.
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I like the idea, though I would prefer that a larger group
of committers (outside Yahoo!) were known up front because
that sounds like a big code base. Any chance you could convince
some of the
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the incubator. Our
draft is available at
I don't see a direct problem with few non-Yahoo developers for
entering incubation, but it will become the most important
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the incubator. Our
draft is available at
I don't see a direct problem with few non-Yahoo developers for
entering incubation, but it
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the
incubator. Our
draft is available at
I don't see a direct problem with few
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Add me.
Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three mentors
that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be considered
for a vote?
Also, besides the lack of non-yahoo committers, are there any other
concerns with the draft? I'm still
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I know, and they may be prevented (by former employee contract) from
talking about it until after Y! makes the code public. I would just
place it on the wish list of things to do before graduating.
Sounds good. Do I need to put more explicit into the proposal draft?
On Jun 15, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I like the idea, though I would prefer that a larger group
of committers (outside Yahoo!) were known up front because
that sounds like a big code base. Any chance you could convince
some of the former coders to join in the
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I like the idea, though I would prefer that a larger group
of committers (outside Yahoo!) were known up front because
that sounds like a big code base. Any chance you could convince
some of the former coders to join in the proposal?
This is definitely a valid concern. We
On Jun 12, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Good morning,
We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the
incubator. Our draft is available at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficServerProposal
A quick overview of Traffic Server:
Traffic Server is a Yahoo! /
Good morning,
We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the incubator.
Our draft is available at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficServerProposal
A quick overview of Traffic Server:
Traffic Server is a Yahoo! / Inktomi caching proxy server. It has been
actively
27 matches
Mail list logo
