The VOTE has passed with 5 binding +1's and no -1s.
I'll start the work to get the podling started.
Thank you.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> +1 from me (binding).
>
> Good luck!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> On 3/6/13 9:04 AM, "Leonidas Fegaras" wrote:
>
>>Dear
The required action has been taken, so let me close this thread again.
I apologize again for my mistake.
The Sponsors are changed as following:
== Champion ==
* Alex Karasulu
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Alex Karasulu
* Mohammad Nour
* Alan Cabrera
The following IPMCers voted i
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> The required action has been taken, so let me close this thread again.
> I apologize again for my mistake.
>
> The Sponsors are changed as following:
>
> == Champion ==
>
> * Alex Karasulu
>
> == Nominated Mentors ==
>
>* Alex Kar
We're also missing Ant Elder from the Nominated Mentors list no?
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:45 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon >wrote:
>
> > The required action has been taken, so let me close this thread again.
> > I apologize again for my mistake.
> >
>
Hi
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> We're also missing Ant Elder from the Nominated Mentors list no?
>
Fixed
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:45 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon > >wrote:
> >
> > > The required action has bee
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> We're also missing Ant Elder from the Nominated Mentors list no?
> Fixed...
I have pasted the current version of the proposal below, so that this
list has it correctly archived
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>> We're also missing Ant Elder from the Nominated Mentors list no?
>> Fixed...
>
> I have pasted the current ve
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
> ...I believe the following is is the current version following
> the vote and discussion. If there are any further personnel changes
> can we please have the discussion on private@ to make sure there is
> consensus before posting here
Ok -
I think that this vote should be invalidated.
Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
It is not 5.
Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?
If two members of the IPMC step forward to Mentor MRQL I might change my mind.
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Edw
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
>
> It is not 5.
For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.
Mohammed Nour El-Din
Alex Karasulu
Tommaso Teofili
Chris Mattmann
> Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Men
Maybe 3 including myself? or If we need to recruit one more Mentor and
re-open the vote with properly updated proposal, Please let us know.
I apologize that I made a mistake here. I was confused with this comment[1].
1. http://markmail.org/message/k6s56f5wlxgqhq3k
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:06 A
On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Maybe 3 including myself?
Hi Edward,
As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be IPMC
members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion for MRQL.
Since you have asked to be added to IPMC [
OKay I see.
> As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be
> IPMC members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion
> for MRQL.
Regarding Champion, Am I not a Officer of ASF? - "A candidate project
shall be sponsored by an Officer or Member of t
No. This doesn't work. That sentence is followed by another:
Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation (i.e. is an Officer
> only), the Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the Sponsor.
The Sponsor here is the Incubator. The PMC of the Sponsor is the IPMC.
You aren't an IPMC m
Hi Eddie,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> No. This doesn't work. That sentence is followed by another:
>
> Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation (i.e. is an Officer
>> only), the Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the Sponsor.
>
>
> The Sponsor here is
> could you please close the "Create MRQL" tasks in the Infra Jira until
> the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
> out you can reopen the issues.
Sure.
Since this might not be fixed soon, proposal can be changed
(especially corporation volunteers). And, thank you fo
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>> could you please close the "Create MRQL" tasks in the Infra Jira until
>> the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
>> out you can reopen the issues.
>
> Sure.
>
> Since this might not be fixed soon, proposal can
Hi
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher
> wrote:
> > Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
> >
> > It is not 5.
>
> For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.
>
> Mohammed Nour El-Din
> Alex Karasulu
>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> > could you please close the "Create MRQL" tasks in the Infra Jira until
> > the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
> > out you can reopen the issues.
>
> Sure.
>
> Since this might not be fixed soon, proposal
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon >wrote:
>
> > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" tasks in the Infra Jira until
> > > the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
> > > out you can reopen the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu >wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon > >wrote:
> >
> > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" tasks in the Infra Jira
> until
> > > > the situation has been cleare
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon > > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" task
On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu >>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon <
> edwardy...@apache.org
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > > could you
On Mar 15, 2013, at 6:25 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu >>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon <
>> edward
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> I fully agree. I had a chance also to look at the proposal closely, so will
> +1 if the
> vote is re-opened, but I see no need for it. Its in the hands of competent
> mentors
> and the podling is ready to get on board.
+1 to that! 'Keep cal
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon > > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" task
>> True. I'm totally down with your reasoning.
>>
>> But don't you think it might be a formality we need to comply with, even if
>> it does not make sense at this stage?
>>
>>
> There has been a vote, which passed with enough binding votes, no one has
> -1'd, and no one has retracted their vote. Le
Looks like we can call this finally closed and approved. Edward I think we
can carry forward now.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> >> True. I'm totally down with your reasoning.
> >>
> >> But don't you think it might be a formality we need to comply with,
> even if
Please find that the MRQL mailing lists have been created and are
ready to be used for further discussion:
d...@mrql.incubator.apache.org
u...@mrql.incubator.apache.org
priv...@mrql.incubator.apache.org
Would everyone named on the proposal please go subscribe to them, and
happy MRQL'ing.
Thanks Ant.
Could you please also create commits@ list for wiki/source commit
mails? The submit button of the web form doesn't change from Disabled.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:59 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Please find that the MRQL mailing lists have been created and are
> ready to be used for furthe
Let's move the podling chatter to the dev list. :)
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:55 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" wrote:
> Thanks Ant.
>
> Could you please also create commits@ list for wiki/source commit
> mails? The submit button of the web form doesn't change from Disabled.
>
> On Thu, Mar 2
32 matches
Mail list logo
