Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-13 Thread kelvin goodson
Passed with +1 votes from rubys, farra and davanum and no -1s. Thanks to all for reviewing and commenting. Kelvin. On 06/11/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with t

RE: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > It seems to me that anyone paying attention would have seen that there were > issues with the proposed release, and they were being addressed. And some people may also have missed, or been confused by, the fact that Tuscany has several votes running concurrently.

RE: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I challenge all the other Incubator PMC members who have yet > to vote to follow through on their responsibilities as a > member of this PMC. It seems to me that anyone paying attention would have seen that there were issues with the proposed release, and they were being addressed. Therefore, I

Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-10 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. -- dims On 11/10/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread > becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was > begun at > http://ww

Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-10 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sam Ruby wrote: >> I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread >> becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was >> begun at >> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html >> which contains some issues raised and comments

Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-10 Thread J Aaron Farr
On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was begun at http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html which contains some i

re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-10 Thread Sam Ruby
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was begun at http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those issu

[VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-06 Thread kelvin goodson
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was begun at http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those issu