On May 23, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
Is it that we have identified a new issue that actually affects
_all_ Maven based releases, not just Shindig?
No not necessarily. You can use maven to produce binary releases that
have all the required legal details inside of them; it just
On May 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Upayavira wrote:
I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a
mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the
release process at Apache, and therefore have not followed this thread
in detail, which I really should have.
It
El sáb, 23-05-2009 a las 21:02 +0200, Leo Simons escribió:
On May 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Upayavira wrote:
I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a
mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the
release process at Apache, and therefore have not
El jue, 21-05-2009 a las 07:03 -0400, Upayavira escribió:
I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a
mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the
release process at Apache, and therefore have not followed this thread
in detail, which I really
I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a
mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the
release process at Apache, and therefore have not followed this thread
in detail, which I really should have.
It seems that this release is stalled, but I am
On 12 May 2009, at 00:24, sebb wrote:
Some NOTICE files start with:
=
=
=
==
== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d
of==
== the Apache License, Version
2.0,
On 12/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 00:24, sebb wrote:
Some NOTICE files start with:
=
== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of==
== the Apache
2009/5/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are created
by the war packager that contained 3rd party libraries the DEPENDENCIES file
was sufficient to comply with
On 12/05/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are
created
by the war packager that contained
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
Hi Sebb,
First thanks to take care of this release!
2009/5/11, sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript
On 11 May 2009, at 18:11, sebb wrote:
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and
implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy
Some NOTICE files start with:
=
== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of==
== the Apache License, Version 2.0, ==
== in this case for the Apache
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
Not mocking, just clarifying that on the aggregate level what is distributed
via the standard Apache mechanism easily has its analog source equivalent
which can be built.
Ok, I think we are in general agreement. Are
Multiple hosts can share a public IP address.
This is often the case for organisations with many hosts on their
internal Lan - all the hosts (there could be hundreds) will appear to
have the IP address of the internet gateway.
But this is getting a bit off-topic.
IP is only part of how
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, it just looked odd to have it at the same level as the README, N L
files.
Agreed, however there's also a lot of people who just ftp the files to the
their shared webhost and expect it to work, so to try to make it work for
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
Not mocking, just clarifying that on the aggregate level what is distributed
via the standard Apache mechanism easily has its analog source equivalent
which can be built.
Ok, I think we
On 28-Apr-09, at 1:24 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Jason van Zyl
jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
Not mocking, just clarifying that on the aggregate level what is
distributed
via the standard Apache mechanism easily has its analog source
equivalent
which can be
Calm down, Jason. No one was attacking Maven.
The Apache Software Foundation requires a project (not just an incubator
podling. All projects) to release source in a form that can be used to
recreate the binaries.
For the current state of the Shindig release, this is not possible. Noone
was
Just to clarify:
Our initial release deployment actually included a shindig-sources archive,
however because the PHP release *is* the source archive (the source is the
binary since it's still a scripting language), and the jar's already
included the source code too, we thought this would be
but again that wouldn't qualify as what
Henning described as 'a tarbal of the svn tag'.
Now if it's a requirement, and one that I can fully understand, that the
'source archive' should be usable as to rebuild release archives,
This is what I'm trying to drive some consensus to and get
On 28-Apr-09, at 11:50 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Calm down, Jason. No one was attacking Maven.
I'm not upset, seriously. This is standard fare here, and only
pointing out having any solution which involves Maven might better be
on a path that actually involves Maven developers.
On 26-Apr-09, at 8:25 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to do a checkout of the tag to build it.
The source artifacts provide only java source, no build file.
-1.
As others have pointed out, the ASF
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
applications.
Vote thread:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting
Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
An Apache releases consists of source code. Binary artifacts are just an
add on bonus. I can ping Roy on that subject if you beg to
differ. ;-)
However, as (at least for the Java part), all source code is available
as
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
The RAT report on SVN reports 476 files with unknown licences.
Some of these may be test files (though even these should have AL if
poss), but there seem to be quite a few files that should have the AL
header, e.g. pom.xml etc.
Ok I saw the pom.xml in features
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
We provided both java and php source code.
Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
[...]
[1] http://tinyurl.com/cejp5x
How do I build this to produce the binaries you've deployed?
Hi,
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
We provided both java and php source code.
Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
[...]
[1] http://tinyurl.com/cejp5x
How do
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
We provided both java and php source code.
Java artifacts
I think there are some problems with the archives.
The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory.
Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
None of the 3rd party files are mentioned in the META-INF NOTICE and
LICENSE files.
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
How do I build this to produce the binaries you've deployed?
mvn install -Prelease
I can't, as there's
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have
On 26/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there are some problems with the archives.
The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory.
Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
None of the 3rd party files are
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I think there are some problems with the archives.
The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory.
Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
None of the 3rd party files are mentioned in
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
How do I build this to produce
On 26/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The *php* archive also has the COPYING and COMMITTERS files. The
NOTICE file says 2008.
Those files are from the same source as the java archive, so when the new
archives are created they will be updated too.
Not sure the
On 27/04/2009, Chris Chabot chab...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The *php* archive also has the COPYING and COMMITTERS files. The
NOTICE file says 2008.
Those files are from the same source as the java archive, so when the new
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to do a checkout of the tag to build it.
The source artifacts provide only java source, no build file.
-1.
As others have pointed out, the ASF releases Open SOURCE, not Open
Binaries and part of the
40 matches
Mail list logo
