This vote passes with the following tally:
3 +1s from IPMC (binding)
+1 - Konstantin Boudnik
+1 - Branko Cibej
+1 - Roman Shaposhnik
Also the following PPMC members votes
+1 Yakov Zhdanov
+1 Sergi Vladykin
+1 Semyon Boikov
+1 Alexey Goncharuk
+1 Valentin Kulichenko
Thanks to everyone. I will
On 20.03.2015 21:45, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
Hello,
The Apache Ignite PPMC voted to release Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 RC3.
We now request the IPMC to vote on the release.
Here is the PPMC voting result form Apache Ignite IPMC:
5 +1 (binding)
0 = 0 (binding)
The dev list voting
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:52 PM, David Jencks
david_jen...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
I thought the more-up-to-date version of the backport stuff was here:
http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/
Looks like there was no activity on this project since 2007.
david jencks
On Mar 21, 2015, at
Am 22.03.2015 00:09, schrieb Marvin Humphrey:
[...]
Because release candidate and RC are specialized terms with
precise meaning at Apache and because we make a strong legal
distinction between released and unreleased code, this is
extremely confusing. Having something named RC which is also an
Le 22/03/15 11:04, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
Am 22.03.2015 00:09, schrieb Marvin Humphrey:
[...]
Because release candidate and RC are specialized terms with
precise meaning at Apache and because we make a strong legal
distinction between released and unreleased code, this is
extremely
Le 22/03/15 00:09, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
We wanted to have community to play with the RC3 release for a bit until we
release the final 1.0 release in a week or two.
Because release candidate and RC are
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html says, on the topic of GPL and
similar:
Apache projects cannot distribute any such components. However, if
the component is only needed for optional features, a project can
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html says, on the topic of GPL and
similar:
Apache projects cannot distribute any such
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
I think Ignite does not pose a problem here because it does not have any
GPL dependencies, optional or not. The only classes in question were the
Doug Lee's JSR 166 classes, which I think we already agreed belong
Hi,
I see from the PPMC vote thread that there one of your Mentors suggested
going to
general@incubator earlier. That might have been a good idea -- here
first, then maybe legal-discuss@apache later if we couldn't come up
with a definitive answer.
Can certainly ask here before making a
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21.03.2015 05:25, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
I
Am 21.03.2015 10:47, schrieb Branko Čibej:
[...]
Do you happen to know exactly which versions of those files were
imported? I looked at the ConcurrentHashMap implementation and compared
the current version on that site:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
In this case, can we resume the voting for the release?
Sure, voting has actually never stopped. :) Even if Justin or I were
to
Hi,
This should be easy to fix. Will do.
These are not licensing errors as such, but still nice to fix. Next release is
fine.
These are optional runtime dependencies (GPL code is not present in the
Apache Ignite source tree).
That's 100% OK then.
Again, same as above. This is an optional
Justin,
Thanks for your quick feedback. My comments are below.
D.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
If the files don't contain any GPL IP, then what we have is a licensing
documentation bug:
That's also my opinion. There are however
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 21.03.2015 10:47, schrieb Branko Čibej:
[...]
Do you happen to know exactly which versions of those files were
imported? I looked at the ConcurrentHashMap implementation and compared
the current version on that
I thought the more-up-to-date version of the backport stuff was here:
http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/
david jencks
On Mar 21, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
--089e0112c408e2ec4c0511c9d829
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Is this GPL software bundled or required?
./modules/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/gnu-gplv2ce-license.txt
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
The new 1.0 release with corrected headers will be
submitted for PPMC vote on Monday.
Hmm, I'm confused. This is 1.0-RC3. I would ordinarily expect that
to become 1.0 once the release vote succeeds. While
On 22.03.2015 00:09, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
The new 1.0 release with corrected headers will be
submitted for PPMC vote on Monday.
Hmm, I'm confused. This is 1.0-RC3. I would ordinarily expect that
to become
On 22.03.2015 00:02, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Is this GPL software bundled or required?
Hi,
I notice several files seem to be licensed under GPL. Can you confirm if this
is the case or not.
./modules/core/src/main/java/org/jdk8/backport/ConcurrentHashMap8.java
./modules/core/src/main/java/org/jdk8/backport/ConcurrentLinkedDeque8.java
Hi Justin,
These are a few files back-ported directly from OpenJdk v8 code into
Ignite. For example, you can find the same file in OpenJDK here:
http://grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/root/jdk/openjdk/8-b132/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap.java
This question had already
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Justin,
These are a few files back-ported directly from OpenJdk v8 code into
Ignite. For example, you can find the same file
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
I think we made a mistake and imported the wrong version of the source
code. The same version is provided here by Doug Lee without the GPL
headers, but only with Public Domain header:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Justin,
These are a few files back-ported directly from OpenJdk v8 code into
Ignite. For example, you can find the same file in OpenJDK here:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
In this case, can we resume the voting for the release?
Sure, voting has actually never stopped. :) Even if Justin or I were
to vote -1, release VOTEs are majority approval with minimum of 3
binding +1 votes. The
Hi,
If the files don't contain any GPL IP, then what we have is a licensing
documentation bug:
That's also my opinion. There are however several other issue with LICENSE and
NOTICE, most are also bugs' but I'm concerned about the other GPL licenses and
the EPL license.
Notice file needs
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
I think we made a mistake and imported the wrong version of the source
code. The same version is provided here by Doug Lee without
Hello,
The Apache Ignite PPMC voted to release Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 RC3.
We now request the IPMC to vote on the release.
Here is the PPMC voting result form Apache Ignite IPMC:
5 +1 (binding)
0 = 0 (binding)
The dev list voting thread:
30 matches
Mail list logo
