David Blevins wrote:
Here's the revised language:
RESOLVED, that The Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to enterprise application containers and
object distribution services [based on,
On May 2, 2007, at 3:23 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Here's the revised language:
RESOLVED, that The Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to enterprise application
Noel, we definitely understand we don't have an exclusive lock on
any ASF land; we understand perfectly that's not how the ASF works :)
-David
On May 1, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable,
we definitely understand we don't have an exclusive lock on
any ASF land; we understand perfectly that's not how the ASF works :)
:-)
As I allowed earlier, the discourse devolved a bit into a bikeshed. :-) I
look forward to the revised language, and OpenEJB's graduation.
--- Noel
On May 1, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
we definitely understand we don't have an exclusive lock on
any ASF land; we understand perfectly that's not how the ASF works :)
:-)
As I allowed earlier, the discourse devolved a bit into a
bikeshed. :-) I
look forward to the revised
Brett Porter wrote:
Noel J. Bergman asked:
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
There are individuals from = 3 employers in both committers and the PMC.
Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one
(e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count as
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
secure architecture for the development and deployment
of component-based business applications
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security)?
Generally, I think it's good
David Blevins wrote:
The definition of ejb spells out Scalable, transactional, and
multi-user secure which is summed up by the word 'enterprise'.
So maybe something like creation and maintenance of enterprise
application containers and object distribution. Maybe expand
that last part to
On 30/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one
(e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count as a single employer)?
Yup.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe,
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
secure architecture for the development and deployment
of component-based business applications
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security)?
They
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be in EJB and related technologies ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project, so
that description would be adequate. It does give me an ick feeling
though as it's very much in the nature of the project to go beyond EJB
and test
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be in EJB and related technologies ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project,
so that description would be adequate. It does give me an ick
feeling though as it's very
On Apr 27, 2007, at 3:19 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/25/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and
On Friday 27 April 2007 13:12, David Blevins wrote:
Haven't seen any more discussion, so just following up. Noel, were
your questions answered to your liking? Niclas?
+1 to graduate OpenEJB to TLP.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work
On 4/25/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/25/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
Haven't seen any more discussion, so just following up. Noel, were
your questions answered to your liking? Niclas?
-David
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Brett,
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
the creation and maintenance of open-source
Brett,
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
no charge to the public.
A bit generic for a project that is intended to managing an
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett,
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
There are individuals from = 3 employers in both committers and the PMC.
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
no charge to the public.
A bit generic for a project
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote:
Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the
words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think
it's good to be able to innovate in the space and not limit ourselves
to the ideas approved by the
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote:
Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the
words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think
it's good to be able to innovate in the space and
Hi to all incubator PMC folk,
The OpenEJB community have voted to ask the incubator PMC to
recommended the following resolution to the board.
For further reference, see the earlier thread on this list:
http://www.nabble.com/-proposal--OpenEJB-Graduation-Proposal-tf3509732.html#a9803491
Note
23 matches
Mail list logo
