El vie, 17-04-2009 a las 10:41 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin escribió:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
* IPMC informally agrees that the opinion of any TLP prospectively
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Santiago Gala santiago.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel happy that TLPs have to exercise judgement calls. They decide if
a small component is appropriate, the incubator handles IP clearance
oversight and they adopt the one/two committers, handing community
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
* IPMC informally agrees that the opinion of any TLP prospectively
admitting a graduating podling as a subproject is of great weight with
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
opinions?
Is there any purpose beyond having a process for process sake and, as
you say, avoiding PMCs to make judgment
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO more process is sadly inevitable as apache scales
If so, I think something dies with it... And critics saying that ASF
is not sustainable was right. Well
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
* IPMC informally agrees that the opinion of any TLP prospectively admitting
a graduating podling as a subproject is of great weight with regard to
whether the aggregate community situation would meet volume +
--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
From: Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
Subject: Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009, 4:47 AM
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM,
Matt Benson
Matt Benson wrote:
I'll apologize in advance because I will probably sound like a total dick
in this email being
that I'm irritated for unrelated reasons at the moment.
LOL Sorry to hear it, but I must have missed the part where you were so
acting.
let it now be known that Commons will not
--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
From: Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
Subject: RE: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009, 11:30 AM
Matt Benson wrote:
I'll apologize in advance
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Commons is working *now*. Just as Jakarta was working once. But
Commons will most likely no longer work when it is growing too much.
And the things discussed here (making Commons the target of many new
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Commons is working *now*. Just as Jakarta was working once. But
Commons will most likely no longer work when it is growing too much.
And
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
There seems to be some concern in Commons that committers are a threat
to the existing codebase.
I know the concerns you mention and felt them very much in the
discussion about JSch. But, at least for me personally, I
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 1:22 AM
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:42 AM
Received 3 declarations of intent to -1 (vote not in progress yet) from IPMC
members so perhaps it's time to step back and talk about requirements since the
proposed solution seems to sit unfavorably with several people on this list.
Further commentary below:
--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Noel J.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
The primary obstacle to Commons using the normal Incubator practices is the
community exit requirements. We feel that, due to the small size/scope of a
Commons component, a podling graduating into Commons should be
15 matches
Mail list logo
