On 23/11/14 20:41, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> Metrics do not provide this information, and indeed can detract from the
> community health issues.
In looking at http://projects.bitergia.com/apache-cloudstack/browser/,
I'm wondering if any meaningful metrics can be provided.
Take for
nto valuable data about the foundation as a whole I
can see real value with minimal risk. Sally, over on press@ is currently
looking at the kind of data that would be useful to report.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Sergio Fernández [mailto:sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at]
Sent: Sunday,
t;> Ross
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 12:24 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: dashboarding incubator
>>
>> On 21 November 2014 20:44, Bertrand Delac
x27;t get me started on how metrics
are not a good evaluator of open source code...)
I fully agree with the comments below.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 12:24 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: dashboarding incub
Sergio, I think there's no need to ask for permission
in this particular case, unless you'd need to have
INFRA help you obtaining information that is not
publicly available.
But then again, knowing what this information is
would be useful anyway ;-)
So yeah... go ahead! I'd like to help as much
a
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
>> dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and
>> I think could be us
...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 12:27 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: dashboarding incubator
We already evaluated the Bitergia offering - it is expensive and does not
provide sufficient benefit for the money (don't get me started on how metrics
are not a
lto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 12:24 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: dashboarding incubator
On 21 November 2014 20:44, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > ...I am generally against us
On 21 November 2014 20:44, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > ...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this.
> > We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for
> > instance). It takes a non-t
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> ...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this.
> We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for
> instance). It takes a non-trivial amount of work to setup and maintain
> such a system, and in
One down side to the github provided analytics is that projects may be
restricted in how they can make use of those analytics in e.g.
presentations. Github has previously asserted that those analytic outputs
are subject to a license grant from github and requested sign off in the
form of a user agr
I agree with David.
For example, many projects are now mirrored to github, and github has
very good analytics:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pulse
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/graphs/contributors
And, I don't have to log an INFRA JIRA to get them. Which makes both
m
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
> dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and
> I think could be useful. See for instance the dashboard they provided for
> Apache
13 matches
Mail list logo
