Leo Simons wrote:
> Is the issue now resolved as far as the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
> is concerned
We can hope.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go.
>>
>>
I would like to retract my comments above.
good! This sounds like progress. Is the issue now resolved as far as the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list is co
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go. No one other than you is characterizing it that way. Just
let
it go.
I let it go for three months and now I'm seeing the consequences on not
speaking up earlier. If peopl
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go. No one other than you is characterizing it that way. Just let
it go.
I let it go for three months and now I'm seeing the consequences on not
speaking up earlier. If people here think it is appropri
> unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go. No one other than you is characterizing it that way. Just let
it go.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Please, not here. I'm quite confident that a good portion of the
inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
gen
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Please, not here. I'm quite confident that a good portion of the
inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
general@ nor [EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Steven Noels wrote:
>
> Please, not here. I'm quite confident that a good portion of the
> inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
> this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
> general@ nor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Noels wrote:
...
But that is not what we are talking about ATM... I see two persons
bringing bad vibes into the wrong places. That will reflect badly upon
both of them. What I was trying to suggest is that those persons try and
find a solution amongst themselves.
David Blevins wrote:
...
On 09 Jul 2004, at 03:44, David Blevins wrote:
I really don't want to get caught in the cross-fire, but...you could
call each other up and talk/yell this out on the phone and get the
argument over quickly.
+1, but some people just *need* the audience, alas. ;-)
(now i'm really gone)
--
Steven Noel
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:09:13AM +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
>
> >>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified. I'm sorry Nicola but
> >>you instigated this and only you can fix it.
> >
> >
> >Stephen, saying that som
> > I've suggested to Nicola Ken that he start work on a web page to
> > cover ideals, techniques and scenarios [regarding communication
> > skills and other useful community building techniques.]
>
> I figure your suggestion and the assumedly planned work can't have
> anything to do with what is h
Sander Striker wrote:
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:58 PM
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants of this
list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in whic
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:58 PM
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> >>I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants of this
> >>list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
> >>this flamefest.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Ther
On 08 Jul 2004, at 20:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a general discussion on community building
techniques and communication skills is worth
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I've suggested to Nicola Ken that he start work on a web page
to cover ideals, techniques and scenarios [related to community
building and conversation skills]
-1
Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified.
Your opinion is noted, but that is not your call to make. I asked him i
> I've suggested to Nicola Ken that he start work on a web page
> to cover ideals, techniques and scenarios [related to community
> building and conversation skills]
> -1
> Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified.
Your opinion is noted, but that is not your call to make. I asked him if he
would vo
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: Personal attacks and respect
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> >>I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
> >>of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
&g
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a general discussion on community building
techniques and communication skills is worthwhile. I've suggested to
> I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
> of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
> this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a general discussion on community building
techniques and communication skills is worthwhile. I've suggested to Nicola
Ken that
Could you please stop lowering the signal-to-noise ratio of this mailing list?
Thanks,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Personal attacks and resp
On 08 Jul 2004, at 18:38, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
As an innocent bystander of the flamewar that spawned this email:
Nicola commented on some technical changes, it started deteriorating
into shed painting, Nicola posted an email on de-escalating conflict
in technical di
Brian McCallister wrote:
As an innocent bystander of the flamewar that spawned this email:
Nicola commented on some technical changes, it started deteriorating
into shed painting, Nicola posted an email on de-escalating conflict in
technical discussions, then Stephen attacked Nicola directly fo
As an innocent bystander of the flamewar that spawned this email:
Nicola commented on some technical changes, it started deteriorating
into shed painting, Nicola posted an email on de-escalating conflict in
technical discussions, then Stephen attacked Nicola directly for some
as-yet-unspecifi
Nicola:
If you have a problem with my annoyance at your presumption to preach -
then present it here away from any particular project.
Stephen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
25 matches
Mail list logo
