Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

) to take part in the discussion and vote. -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking -- Original -- From: "asf"; Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2018 07:36 PM To: "general"; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator Adrian Cole wrot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

Adrian Cole wrote on 8/17/18 5:29 AM: > I would like to propose Zipkin as an Apache Incubator project. > > The text of the proposal can be found below as well as on the Incubator wiki: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZipkinProposal Glad to see this come through! One thing I'd like to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

It is glad to see my and SkyWalking's good friend, Zipkin and its community to start their Apache journey. We have a lot of connections in open source world, even shared the same and first China meetup in Beijing. Even I can't be project mentor, I will try my best to help the Zipkin

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

If there’s no further discussion, I will call for a VOTE tomorrow. -Taylor > On Aug 6, 2018, at 10:47 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I would like to propose DLab as an Apache Incubator project. > > The text of the proposal can be found below as well as on the Incubator wiki: > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

Thanks Debo, Traditionally/in practice/lately, those who are not IPMC members are listed as “Interested Contributors”. Are you okay with that? I’ll gladly add it and invite anyone else who is interested to join that group. As we tried to make clear in the proposal, we understand the current

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

I am happy to help (either mentor or volunteer). This is a good idea. Have helped out in Apache projects before. Debo Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 7, 2018, at 6:08 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > Henry Saputra (hsaputra) has been added to the mentor list. > > We are still interested in

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

Henry Saputra (hsaputra) has been added to the mentor list. We are still interested in proposal feedback and mentor volunteers. -Taylor > On Aug 6, 2018, at 10:47 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I would like to propose DLab as an Apache Incubator project. > > The text of the proposal can be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

From: "Huxing Zhang"<hux...@apache.org> >> Date: 2018/2/7 23:42:48 >> To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation >> >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

-- > From: "Huxing Zhang"<hux...@apache.org> > Date: 2018/2/7 23:42:48 > To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation > > > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:28 PM, 吴晟 Shen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Have a good day. ---Original--- From: "Huxing Zhang"<hux...@apache.org> Date: 2018/2/7 23:42:48 To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation Hi, On

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

can add SkyWalking as related Apache project in your proposal. Have a good day. ---Original--- From: "Huxing Zhang"<hux...@apache.org> Date: 2018/2/7 23:42:48 To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incub

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

t;general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation Hi, On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Sheng Wu <wu.sh...@foxmail.com> wrote: > I agree about Dubbo's formal alibaba team makes a mistake, but even so, it > is still a very popular

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

> Dubbo open source community. > > -- > *Sheng Wu* > Apache SkyWalking creator and PPMC member > > > > -- Original -- > *From: * "Ian Luo";<ian@gmail.com>; > *Date: * Wed, Feb 7, 2018 05:36 PM >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

. -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking creator and PPMC member -- Original -- From: "Ian Luo";<ian@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, Feb 7, 2018 05:36 PM To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPO

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi sebb, On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the >> mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, While it’s nice to see all the +1s this isn’t a vote thread. :-) Does anyone have any feedback on the proposal? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 WangXin lovep...@hotmail.com 在 2018年2月7日，上午10:14，xin zhang > 写道： +1 On 7 Feb 2018, at 09:57, vintagewang > wrote: +1 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jim

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 > On 7 Feb 2018, at 09:57, vintagewang wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> +1 >> >>> On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: >>> >>> Dear Apache Incubator Community, >>> >>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 > > > On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: > > > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 > On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Good news! I think Dubbo will be more and more popular. On 2018/02/04 04:06:44, Xin Wang wrote: > +1 (non-binding)> > I'm glad to see the coming of Dubbo which is a very popular RPC framework.> > > > 2018-02-03 19:44 GMT+08:00 Huxing Zhang :> > > > Dear

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 non-binding Dubbo has good user base already. Very pleased to see it become an Apache project. Jack Kevin A. McGrail 于2018年2月5日 周一下午6:07写道： > +1 binding > > On 2/4/2018 10:28 PM, dongeforever wrote: > > +1 > > > > 2018-02-05 11:26 GMT+08:00 Jeff Zhang

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Sure, sounds reasonable. Let's stick to one :) On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the > > mailing lists from the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the > mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be benefit > since in this way we could use dev to discuss product bugs/features, and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Mark, Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be benefit since in this way we could use dev to discuss product bugs/features, and use user for troubleshooting purpose. Regards, -Ian. On Mon, Feb 5,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 03/02/18 11:44, Huxing Zhang wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal > > Dubbo is a high-performance, lightweight, Java based RPC framework. > Dubbo offers three key

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 binding On 2/4/2018 10:28 PM, dongeforever wrote: +1 2018-02-05 11:26 GMT+08:00 Jeff Zhang : +1 Adam Feng 于2018年2月5日周一 上午11:00写道： +1 Thanks. Adam Feng On 3 Feb 2018, 7:45 PM +0800, Huxing Zhang , wrote: Dear Apache Incubator

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) With Warm regards Billy Liu 2018-02-05 11:31 GMT+08:00 yukon : > Glad to see Dubbo here, Dubbo is really a great RPC framework and widely > used in China. > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Adam Feng wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> Thanks. >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Glad to see Dubbo here, Dubbo is really a great RPC framework and widely used in China. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Adam Feng wrote: > +1 > > > > Thanks. > Adam Feng > > On 3 Feb 2018, 7:45 PM +0800, Huxing Zhang , wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 2018-02-05 11:26 GMT+08:00 Jeff Zhang : > +1 > > > Adam Feng 于2018年2月5日周一 上午11:00写道： > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > Adam Feng > > > > On 3 Feb 2018, 7:45 PM +0800, Huxing Zhang , wrote: > > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 Adam Feng 于2018年2月5日周一 上午11:00写道： > +1 > > > > Thanks. > Adam Feng > > On 3 Feb 2018, 7:45 PM +0800, Huxing Zhang , wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 Thanks. Adam Feng On 3 Feb 2018, 7:45 PM +0800, Huxing Zhang , wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal > > Dubbo is a high-performance,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) I'm glad to see the coming of Dubbo which is a very popular RPC framework. 2018-02-03 19:44 GMT+08:00 Huxing Zhang : > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the question, Liang. The performance of Coral (previously named as Onyx) depends on deployment scenarios. We haven't done extensive experiments with Coral+Spark yet. However, in several deployment scenarios we've been looking at, Coral+Beam outperforms direct Spark even though the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Looks a nice project, very interested in checking more detail. How about the performance? Onyx+spark in comparison to directly using spark, whether reduce performance ,or not ? Regards Liang Byung-Gon Chun wrote > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thank you all for the feedback. We changed the project name to Coral. You can find the proposal at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CoralProposal . I will soon send out a voting email. Thanks. -Gon On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Thanks,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the information, John! On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Sorry for mid-posting. > > This isn't the list to determine if a project name is suitable. There's a > JIRA project dedicated to that, and if you need a quick answer better to >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks, much appreciated ! Regards JB On 01/31/2018 09:50 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Coral is a good name ! >> > > Thanks! > > >> >> Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Sorry for mid-posting. This isn't the list to determine if a project name is suitable. There's a JIRA project dedicated to that, and if you need a quick answer better to email trademarks@ to get a more precise answer. The question is really going to be, is "Apache Onyx" going to be easily

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > Coral is a good name ! > Thanks! > > Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that case, in > addition of > your ICLA, we would need a SGA (it's not blocker for the project > bootstrapping

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, Coral is a good name ! Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that case, in addition of your ICLA, we would need a SGA (it's not blocker for the project bootstrapping or code donation, but we, at least, will need it later for graduation). On the other hand, if the committers

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

If Coral as our project name is fine, I will start voting in a couple of days. Let me know if you have any concern. Thanks. -Gon On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Thanks for the comments, JB! > My replies are inlined below. > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the comments, JB! My replies are inlined below. On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > sorry to be a little bit late on this. > > It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability > layer we want to add in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, sorry to be a little bit late on this. It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability layer we want to add in Apache Beam. I would love to see interaction between the two communities. I have two minor questions: 1. about the name: Onyx sounds very generic and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thank you for all the information! It looks like Surf doesn't work. If possible, we'd like to keep Onyx. Another name we came up with is Coral. Thanks! -Gon On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Did we rule out Onyx for sure? Just because some other

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Did we rule out Onyx for sure? Just because some other project might use it on say github doesn’t necessarily exclude us from having an Apache Onyx? FWIW, I agree that surf is too similar in pronunciation to Apache serf. :) Cheers, — Leif > On Jan 27, 2018, at 07:31, Dave Fisher

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Checking “Serf Software” which sounds the same. (1) there is already Apache Serf (2) Serf is a product from Hashicorp at https://www.serf.io/. This would definitely confuse as it is apparently comparable to ZooKeeper. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 27, 2018, at 3:12 AM, sebb

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

A brief search for 'Surf Software' shows quite a few hits. I have not looked to see if they would be likely to be confused with this project or cause problems for others. But it as though there might be a problem: Surfer - Golden Software surf @ sourceforge Surf Software company On 27 January

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Since we cannot use the name Onyx, we would like to change the project name to Surf. I hope that this name works. -Gon --- Byung-Gon Chun On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Le 26 janv. 2018 21:53, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible, efficient runtime that supports

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible, efficient runtime that supports various user programs (e.g., Beam and Spark programs). We are taking

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? Otherwise +1 to have it @asf, makes a lot of sense. Le 26 janv. 2018 20:58, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot of promise, and I'd love to > see its evolution inside the Foundation. > > Thanks, Davor! > Parts of it, like the Onyx Intermediate Representation [1], overlap with > the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Great work -- I think this technology has a lot of promise, and I'd love to see its evolution inside the Foundation. Parts of it, like the Onyx Intermediate Representation [1], overlap with the work-in-progress inside the Apache Beam project ("portability"). We'd love to work together on this --

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

So far, it seems like we have nothing but positive responses from the community. Let's move this into a vote in the next day or so? John On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:12 AM Tan,Zhongyi wrote: > Hi,william, > > Thanks, I updated Echarts proposal also. > > > > > 在 2018/1/12

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi,william, Thanks, I updated Echarts proposal also. 在 2018/1/12 下午3:38， "William Guo" 写入: >Our Apache Griffin is also using ECharts as frontier, it is so convenient >and so powerful. >I think, definitely, it will benefit Apache community too. > > > >Thanks,

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi，shaofeng， I know Kylin project, it is famous. I have updated EChart Proposal to add your project's name there Thanks 在 2018/1/12 下午1:12， "ShaoFeng Shi" 写入: >Hi Zhongyi, > >Our project is Apache Kylin, an OLAP engine for big data. Here is the >project homepage:

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Our Apache Griffin is also using ECharts as frontier, it is so convenient and so powerful. I think, definitely, it will benefit Apache community too. Thanks, William On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:12 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > Hi Zhongyi, > > Our project is Apache Kylin,

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Zhongyi, Our project is Apache Kylin, an OLAP engine for big data. Here is the project homepage: https://kylin.apache.org/ 2018-01-12 11:23 GMT+08:00 Tan,Zhongyi : > Hi，shaofeng， thanks > > What is your project name？ > > I may need to update the proposal to add your

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi，shaofeng， thanks What is your project name？ I may need to update the proposal to add your project name there。 Best regards 在 18/1/11 21:57，“ShaoFeng Shi” 写入: >ECharts is a popular web toolkit as I know; We can quickly build very fancy >web charts with it; In

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

ECharts is a popular web toolkit as I know; We can quickly build very fancy web charts with it; In our scenario (OLAP front-end), ECharts directly connect with Apache Kylin REST server within JavaScript, no middleware layer needed; This framework is very agile and lightweight. Glad to see it can

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks， willem， I will contact you. 在 2018/1/11 下午7:27， "Willem Jiang" 写入: >It's great to see that ECharts be a part of Apache incubating project. >As Wu Shen and I are in Beijing, we could share you some experiences of >incubating project setup things. > >Willem

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

It's great to see that ECharts be a part of Apache incubating project. As Wu Shen and I are in Beijing, we could share you some experiences of incubating project setup things. Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter:

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Glad to hear that, I will add apache eagle to Echarts proposal document also. thanks 在 2018/1/8 下午12:31， "Hao Chen" 写入: >Great to hear that ECharts is coming to ASF! > >ECharts is a great chart library with good documentation and well >community >support. In Apache Eagle,

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Great to hear that ECharts is coming to ASF! ECharts is a great chart library with good documentation and well community support. In Apache Eagle, we use ECharts a lot for monitoring dashboards and data visualization. Welcome and Good luck! Hao Chen On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:33 AM,

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi， wusheng & skywalking team， Glad to hear that your project is already using echarts. If meet any problem or have any feature request, please let us know. Thanks I will update the proposal to add your project there. 在 2018/1/7 下午6:18， "吴晟 Sheng Wu" 写入: >Hi, ECharts

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Great. We know that CarbonData is one project contributed by Huawei, And become TLP project last year. I believe that we will have more cooperation between these two projects in the future. Thanks 在 2018/1/7 下午4:44， "Liang Chen" 写入: >Hi > >Thanks, bringing this

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

gt; 日期: 2018年1月6日 星期六 上午3:00 至: <general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>> 主题: Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation Hi - On Jan 5, 2018, at 2:00 AM, Tan,Zhongyi <tanzhon...@baidu.com<mailto:tanzhon...@baidu.com>> wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Please see my comments inline, thanks 在 2018/1/6 上午2:51， "Dave Fisher" 写入: >Hi - > >(1) This looks really cool and I would like to volunteer to Mentor the >project. Great, it is our pleasure to add you as the mentor. The ECharts proposal on wiki.apache.org has been

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, ECharts community team. Glad your guys bringing the project to Apache. SkyWalking 's next release will use some ECharts charts for our APM visualization. (already in developing branch) So if you like, you can put `Apache SkyWalking (Incubating)` in your "Relationships with Other Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Thanks, bringing this project to Apache.This is a really good project, i ever used ECharts component in 2014 for some report system UI. I am going to participate in some contribution once this project enter incubator. And our project(Apache CarbonData) looks forward to building ecosystem with

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:00 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > On Jan 5, 2018, at 2:00 AM, Tan,Zhongyi wrote: > > Git Repositories: > Upon entering incubation: https://github.com/apache/incubator-echarts > After incubation, we want to move

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi - > On Jan 5, 2018, at 2:00 AM, Tan,Zhongyi wrote: > > Git Repositories: > Upon entering incubation: https://github.com/apache/incubator-echarts > > After incubation, we want to move the existing repo from >

Re: [PROPOSAL] ECharts - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi - (1) This looks really cool and I would like to volunteer to Mentor the project. (2) You mention that there are over 50 contributors, but only list 5 core developers. Are the 5 core developers all from Baidu? Do you plan to quickly invite some of the other contributors? Regards, Dave >

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi All, I just changed the git-wip address with a gitbox version, as I was told that new incubator projects will require to use gitbox. Chris Am 13.12.17, 01:41 schrieb "Mike Drob" : > Can’t enter incubation without having code. I think this has been done

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

> Can’t enter incubation without having code. I think this has been done before, but it's not relevant now. I agree with John that you should expect to need an SGA. Good luck and good coding! On Tue, Dec 12, 2017, 3:42 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone have

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, Anyone have feedback or see any issues with this proposal? If there are none in the next couple of days I'll go ahead and call a vote. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi John, the only reason for it being private, is that we wanted to start using apache group-ids and package names and therefore were not able to create it as a public repo. It was our solution to the hen-egg-problem of setting up a project with the primary goal of having it live at Apache.

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:46 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > Please let me add a little more information on the project: > > We have currently setup the repo and the CI on our companies GitLab > server. The site is already publishing the project website at: >

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

HI Justin, All, Great to see this initiative culminating here. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

PM To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:49 AM Sheng Wu <wu.sh...@foxmail.com> wrote: > > - I do not think the organization is a legal entity registered > > an

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

; > > > -- Original -- > From: "mck";<m...@apache.org>; > Date: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 07:37 PM > To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache I

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

e ICLA. -- Sheng Wu SkyWalking -- Original -- From: "mck";<m...@apache.org>; Date: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 07:37 PM To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

> > > > = Proposal = > > > > The goal of this proposal is to bring the existing Skywalking > > > > https://github.com/OpenSkywalking/skywalking codebase and existing > > > > developers and community into the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) in > > > > order to build a global, diverse and

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:13 AM mck wrote: > John, thanks for the time and input. My replies are inline. > > > > > = Proposal = > > > The goal of this proposal is to bring the existing Skywalking > > > https://github.com/OpenSkywalking/skywalking codebase and existing > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:53 AM John D. Ament wrote: > Hi Mick, > > A few comments below. > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:58 AM mck wrote: > >> Dear Apache Incubator Community, >> >> Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

kyWalking -- Original -- From: "mck";<m...@apache.org>; Date: Thu, Nov 30, 2017 07:13 PM To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation John, thanks for the time and input. My replies ar

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

0, 2017 07:20 PM To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation > > > > Who owns this code? Will an SGA be provided, or ICLAs from contributors? > > If ICLAs, are there any of the current 16 contri

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

> > > > Who owns this code? Will an SGA be provided, or ICLAs from contributors? > > If ICLAs, are there any of the current 16 contributors who will not > > provide an ICLA? > > > I gone through this wil Sheng. An SGA will be provided as well as an > ICLA from contributors. > Sheng will bring

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

John, thanks for the time and input. My replies are inline. > > = Proposal = > > The goal of this proposal is to bring the existing Skywalking > > https://github.com/OpenSkywalking/skywalking codebase and existing > > developers and community into the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) in > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

> > The proposal includes a user@ mailing list. > > This is generally not recommended for podlings as their focus needs to > > be on building the developer community. > > > > Podlings are more than welcomed to include user@ lists. There's nothing > stopping them from building developers and

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, I just updated the committer information and added affiliation section for it. Initial Committer - Sheng Wu, 吴晟, wushe...@huawei.com - Yongsheng Peng, 彭勇升, pen...@tydic.com - Xin Zhang, 张鑫, zhang...@oneapm.com - Hongtao Gao, 高洪涛, gaohong...@dangdang.com -

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

You should replace these with mail addresss, not GitHub accounts. Best Regards! - Luke Han On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:16 PM, 吴晟 wrote: > @ in front, represents the GitHub account name of each contributor. That > is an easy way for us to link and

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

There's should only one list for initial committers. Best Regards! - Luke Han > > > > == Initial Incubator PMC == > > * 吴晟, Sheng Wu @wu-sheng > > * 彭勇升, Yongsheng Peng @peng-yongsheng > > * 张鑫, Xin Zhang @ascrutae > > > > == Initial Committer == > > * 吴晟, Sheng Wu

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

ncubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation I think it is a Chinese convention for marking user names, similar to the Twitter convention. A quick check shows that these are not twitter handles, but do appear in Chinese discussion lists. On Wed,

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

I think it is a Chinese convention for marking user names, similar to the Twitter convention. A quick check shows that these are not twitter handles, but do appear in Chinese discussion lists. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:53 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29,

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Mick, A few comments below. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:58 AM mck wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SkyWalkingProposal > > SkyWalking is a distributed

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

t; -- 原始邮件 -- > > 发件人: "Romain Manni-Bucau";<rmannibu...@gmail.com>; > > 发送时间: 2017年11月29日(星期三) 下午3:11 > > 收件人: "general@incubator.apache.org"<general@incubator.apache.org>; > > > > 主题: Re: [PROPOSAL

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

-- > 发件人: "Romain Manni-Bucau";<rmannibu...@gmail.com>; > 发送时间: 2017年11月29日(星期三) 下午3:11 > 收件人: "general@incubator.apache.org"<general@incubator.apache.org>; > > 主题: Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation > > &g

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Mick I'm generally +1 and would be very happy to help but before voting can you clarify the position with other donations like https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/50 please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-29 7:58 GMT+01:00 mck

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >