Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I guess I'll just get it done next weekend.
Done.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Agree, and I don't think you need to wait if you don't want to...
Yeah, I guess I'll just get it done next weekend.
Re: the trademark issue. I guess the other party is just fine with the
fact that we're retiring the
Agree... finding a retired podling takes some effort, and if it still
manages to get higher ranking at Google et al, well, what can we say...
-- Niclas
On Aug 12, 2009 11:45 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org
Hi,
So who's going to do what about XAP?
I tried understanding the related threads, but I couldn't figure out
why it's so complicated. If it were up to me, I'd simply follow [1].
In fact, unless someone takes some action on XAP by the end of this
month, I'll do just that based on the already
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
So who's going to do what about XAP?
I tried understanding the related threads, but I couldn't figure out
why it's so complicated. If it were up to me, I'd simply follow [1].
In fact, unless someone takes some action
Agree, and I don't think you need to wait if you don't want to...
-- Niclas
On Aug 10, 2009 11:08 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So who's going to do what about XAP?
I tried understanding the related threads, but I couldn't figure out
why it's so complicated. If it were
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
So who's going to do what about XAP?
I tried understanding the related threads, but I couldn't figure out
why it's so complicated.
AFAIK, the only complication is an outstanding trademark issue. It's
depend on so
the
theory that incubating means don't depend on it is just that, a
theory.)
Sanjiva.
2009/7/26 Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Would this be moved to the attic?
Probably not. The Attic is the collection of all released Apache
Projects. Podlings != Projects, and were never accepted as projects.
Do we want to charge the Attic with such additional burdens of then
completing all IP clearances that
Agree with Bill. Attic isn't the place, and Incubator has plenty or
suspended/terminated/dead/inactive/whatever-the-politically-correct-term-is
and I see no point changing this.
-- Niclas
On Jul 28, 2009 4:41 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: Would this
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
In favor:
Noel J. Bergman
Hello PMC,
As a committer on the XAP Project, I would also vote +1 (non binding of
course) for moving the project from incubation to the attic. We have seen
little community develop around the project and have been making little/no
progress on the code lately.
Thanks for everyones help
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/16/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
+1. I see little chance of XAP being resurrected at this point.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Craig
On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
with XAP,
I am
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP
+1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP
+1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Yoav Shapira yo...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
+1.
Eddie
On Feb 16, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
henn...@apache.org wrote:
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached
+1
--kevan
On Feb 16, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
with XAP,
I am
+1.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
On 2/16/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 08:34 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
Sorry, for the delay. We just added the report.
salu2
-Bertrand
-
To
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
Buildr report added, sorry for the delay.
Assaf
-Bertrand
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under monthly at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, but you're right,
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under monthly at
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three month
schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info
which is a good trigger for updating said info ;-)
-Bertrand
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
The info has been updated since then.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbdf47dc06f1dbb0fd2b00e109b86
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
seems be on December.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
[1]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
seems be on December.
I just removed;
* Hama (June - Aug)
from the Monthly section.
Mentors: You need to get better at this!
Cheers
Niclas
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and there seems to be some life in WSRP4J,
but Lokahi and XAP seem quite inactive.
XAP has been almost entirely inactive for at least the last 4 months. I
tried to kick off a discussion about its status by asking if it's dead, but
even that didn't elicit much of a response. Not sure what happens now.
+1
Bill,
I'd be very interested in seeing a report at least from BlueSky.
I'll write something up.
The Incubator PMC and the ASF Board would like a status report on Bluesky
every month until further notice, and expect to see substantial movement
towards resolving the issues.
--- Noel
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
We're again missing reports from some incubating projects.
I'd be very interested in seeing a report at least from BlueSky.
I'll write something up.
Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
We're again missing reports from some incubating projects.
I'd be very interested in seeing a report at least from BlueSky.
JSecurity is just starting and there seems to be some life in WSRP4J,
but Lokahi and XAP seem quite inactive.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
I see activity on the mailing lists for all of these projects, and see
active Mentors ... so where are the reports? I will not be readily
available to pick up changes tomorrow morning, so we need them now.
--- Noel
-
Just updated NMaven.
Thanks,
Shane
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see activity on the mailing lists for all of these projects, and see
active Mentors ... so where are the reports? I will not be readily
available to pick up changes tomorrow
Just updated NMaven.
Got it. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got Abdera's, too.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abdera's is updated.
- James
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got Abdera's, too.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Heh... sorry, hit reply before I actually read the note I was replying to :-)
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:32 PM, James Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abdera's is updated.
- James
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got Abdera's, too.
--- Noel
On 07/04/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PM,
The XAP team has taken into account the feedback from sedd and created
two distribution files. The first one is a framework package that
contains everything anyone would need to use XAP. The second one is
geared towards
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:39 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On 07/04/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PM,
The XAP team has taken into account
So, where do we stand on the vote? Is the vote still open, or are we
going to resolve XAP-579 (source and binary builds) and try again with
a 0.5.1 ?
I've been reviewing the 0.5.0 build. I'm not sure all of the samples
work, because I'm not sure what all of them are suppose to do :), but
I would
distribution files would
simplify things for users of the XAP codebase.
Bob (Buffone)
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:29 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On 13/03/2008, Bob
system to work.
Bob (Buffone)
-Original Message-
From: James Margaris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:56 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
That particular Rhino jar is the same one we've been using since
is an interesting one. Prior to version 1.6R5, I
believe Rhino was MPL licensed, and as of 1.6R5 it is dual licensed under
MPL and GPL. It is coming to XAP through Dojo. Do we know which version of
Rhino this is?
If it's 1.6R5 or later, how does a dual MPL / GPL license work in an ASF
project
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PM,
The XAP team has put together a new release of the project (0.5.0) and
it has been approved by the xap-dev list with 8 (+1s) and 0 (others). We
are now asking the Incubator PM to approve this release so we
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On 10/03/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto
, and as of 1.6R5 it is dual licensed under
MPL and GPL. It is coming to XAP through Dojo. Do we know which version of
Rhino this is?
If it's 1.6R5 or later, how does a dual MPL / GPL license work in an ASF
project? Does the ASF have to pick one of the licenses, and are we allowed
to do that? Can we
On 13/03/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
There seem to be several copies of some files, e.g.
dojo.js.uncompressed.js
custom_rhino.jar
flash6_gateway.fla
Hmm, custom_rhino.jar is an interesting one
Incubator PM,
The XAP team has put together a new release of the project (0.5.0) and
it has been approved by the xap-dev list with 8 (+1s) and 0 (others). We
are now asking the Incubator PM to approve this release so we can
distribute it.
The release candidate has been posted at:
http
On 10/03/2008, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator PM,
The XAP team has put together a new release of the project (0.5.0) and
it has been approved by the xap-dev list with 8 (+1s) and 0 (others). We
It would be helpful to have a link to the vote thread.
are now asking
+1 on Robert's mentoring of the XAP project, we would not have released
with out him.
Bob (Buffone)
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:10 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] was: [VOTE] [RETRY] Release
On 3/6/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Congrats on the getting the vote passed and the release out.
I'd like to re-iterate my question: besides Cliff, where are your
other two mentors?
i've been unwell (but i'm better
ANNOUNCEMENT:
The Apache XAP Team (XAP is an open source Ajax project at Apache
Incubator) is pleased to announce the release of the 0.3.0 of its
Declarative Ajax toolkit. Downloads of the project can be found at
http://incubator.apache.org/xap/download.html
Project Overview
On 2/25/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Congrats on the getting the vote passed and the release out.
I'd like to re-iterate my question: besides Cliff, where are your
other two mentors?
i've been unwell (but i'm better now)
- robert
the file.
2.) No signature files
- Issue Raiser: Daniel Kulp
- Resolution: Figured out how to sign the release, then signed the
release. Also, added a KEYS file to the repository under XAP as well as
uploaded the key to the MIT server.
3.) LGPL code in the release without listing
Incubator PMC,
The release of XAP currently has 6 non-binding [+1] votes, but we still
need 3 more binding [+1] votes from the PMC. We have met all the issues
brought up with the first release candidate and a wait. Please take a
look at the release and give your feedback and votes.
Thank you
PMC,
The release of XAP currently has 6 non-binding [+1] votes, but we still
need 3 more binding [+1] votes from the PMC. We have met all the issues
brought up with the first release candidate and a wait. Please take a
look at the release and give your feedback and votes.
Thank you,
Bob (Buffone
Raiser: Daniel Kulp
- Resolution: Figured out how to sign the release, then signed the
release. Also, added a KEYS file to the repository under XAP as well as
uploaded the key to the MIT server.
3.) LGPL code in the release without listing it in the NOTICE and
LICENSE.
- Issue Raiser: Robert
On 2/13/07, Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:28 PM, James Margaris wrote:
Do the author tags need to be removed for release? Is it a general
Apache policy to not include author tags or is it project specific?
apache tries to run with minimal policy. instead we
On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 06:35, robert burrell donkin wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/xap/trunk/codebase/src/
dojo/src/w
idget/Rounded.js is difficult. perhaps DOJO has a special license
but it's
probably best to assume
] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0
On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 06:35, robert burrell donkin wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/xap/trunk/codebase/src/
dojo/src/w
idget/Rounded.js is difficult. perhaps DOJO has a special license
On 2/9/07, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator,
Apache XAP has released version 0.3.0, this is the inaugural release of
the project. With the help of Robert, Cliff and the whole Xapian
community we have worked through development, testing, licensing and
packaging of the XAP release
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/9/07, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incubator,
Apache XAP has released version 0.3.0, this is the inaugural release of
the project. With the help of Robert, Cliff and the whole Xapian
community we have worked through development, testing, licensing
On Friday 09 February 2007 18:57, Bob Buffone wrote:
Incubator,
Apache XAP has released version 0.3.0, this is the inaugural release of
the project. With the help of Robert, Cliff and the whole Xapian
community we have worked through development, testing, licensing and
packaging of the XAP
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 06:35, robert burrell donkin wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/xap/trunk/codebase/src/dojo/src/w
idget/Rounded.js is difficult. perhaps DOJO has a special license but it's
probably best to assume that the license is LGPL and needs to be added
them as well.
I see new checkins of the NOTICE file so I assume a new vote will be
happening shortly.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:45 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: xap-dev
On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:28 PM, James Margaris wrote:
Do the author tags need to be removed for release? Is it a general
Apache policy to not include author tags or is it project specific? (I
quickly checked out log4j and I see lots of author tags there...)
It is not good practice. In log4j,
as an
incubating project.
Someone did point out that dev traffic is falling off while commit
traffic is same or increasing.
As a XAP mentor, I know that the committers already understand that no
decisions will be made over IRC, that logs of each IRC will be
immediately made available
for development
discussions (which I think is a dangerous move, particularly for a new
project).
As a XAP mentor, I know that the committers already understand that no
decisions will be made over IRC, that logs of each IRC will be
immediately made available to the entire community, and that they need
Any off-list communication is a potential problem, not just IRC.
sure. but IRC is much more a problem than IM.
IM *mostly* is peer-peer chat. IRC a *group* is involved.
btw. 404 for:
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html
-jean
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Any off-list communication is a potential problem, not just IRC.
sure. but IRC is much more a problem than IM.
IM *mostly* is peer-peer chat. IRC a *group* is involved.
Given this paragraph in the committers guide [1]:
Everything -- but everything-- inside the
Jean-
Given this paragraph in the committers guide [1]:
Everything -- but everything-- inside the Apache world occurs or is reflected
in email. As some people say, 'If it isn't in my email, it didn't happen.'
Would adding this sentence to the end help?
Decisions only get made on Apache
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Jean-
Given this paragraph in the committers guide [1]:
Everything -- but everything-- inside the Apache world occurs or is
reflected in email. As some people say, 'If it isn't in my email, it
didn't happen.'
Would adding this sentence to the end help?
On 7/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
below) and other recent threads, here's what I would propose also be
doc'd:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using IRC
On 7/11/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made
On 7/11/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Board meetings are another case entirely, but having never listened in
on one, I don't know how practical they'd be to hold via other means.
I suspect it would be difficult though.
Any one can dial in to the Board meetings. It's honestly not
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
IMHO, all of the discussions, especially this early on, should be
happening
on the mailing lists, to encourage more people to participate, and thus
help
grow the community.
+1 on that.
The use of e-mail as the primary means for communication is part of ASF
XAP project infrastructure has been set up, code has been committed and
the project is up and running:
1. The initial website is set up at: http://incubator.apache.org/xap
2. The source code is at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/xap
3. You are welcome to subscribe to XAP dev list via
On 6/22/06, Coach Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XAP project infrastructure has been set up, code has been committed and
the project is up and running:
1. The initial website is set up at: http://incubator.apache.org/xap
2. The source code is at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/xap
3
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:24 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extensible Ajax Platform (XAP) Project Update
IMHO, all of the discussions, especially this early on, should be
happening
Based on the following votes (five of which were cast by PMC
members), the XAP proposal has been accepted for incubation under the
sponsorship of the Incubator PMC.
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Noel J. Bergman
+1 Craeg Strong
+1 Henri Yandell
+1 Susan Wu
+1 Craig L Russell
+1 Sanjiva Weerawarana
Coach Wei wrote:
Raphaël Luta wrote:
Before voting, I just have one (set of) question:
Where's the source code ?
Does it actually exist as a standalone, downloadable entity ?
Is it possible to assess its current status before voting ?
We are still a few days away from completing our due
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
