Re: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

2011-12-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Bart Kummel b...@kummelweb.nl wrote: +1 (non-binding) -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

2011-12-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Joe, On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: So earlier this week infrastructure put out an RFP regarding early adoption of git hosting at the ASF and 3 Incubator projects have responded: callback, s4, and deltaspike... Very cool. Unless there are

Re: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

2011-12-05 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 (binding) Good luck! On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: Hello, Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included below for your convenience. Please vote:

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 for DeltaSpike I thinkthe other requests over at asf-infra also did come from Mentors (as far as I have seen). LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent:

Yan: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

2011-12-05 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
+1(binding) Gurkan Kimden: Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org Kime: general@incubator.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 5 Aralık 2011 0:11 Pazartesi Konu: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator Hello, Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

2011-12-05 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
I would (hope to speak for the whole directmemory team) would be really willing to partecipate. Ciao, Raffaele Il giorno 03/dic/2011 17:47, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com ha scritto: So earlier this week infrastructure put out an RFP regarding early adoption of git hosting at the ASF

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

2011-12-05 Thread Jakob Homan
There is a sample NOTICE file linked [1] from ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy [2] [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice As someone trying to generate these documents, I'm actually finding these

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

2011-12-05 Thread Ross Gardler
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 5, 2011 10:21 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 for DeltaSpike I thinkthe other requests over at asf-infra also did come from Mentors (as far as I have seen). Correct for Callback. My proposal links to the dev

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

2011-12-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: There is a sample NOTICE file linked [1] from ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy [2] [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice As

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound

2011-12-05 Thread Hyrum K Wright
I don't know the proper answer to the licensing and patent questions. My understanding (standard caveats apply) is that the BSD is a Category A license, and as software distributed under it may be included in ASF software such as Bloodhound. I'm unsure what the concern about BSD notices in source

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound

2011-12-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I suggest legal-discuss@ is involved to answer it. Although it is Cat A license, I don't think it is fully kosher, as we promise that the original contributor hasn't submarined any patents, but BSD doesn't state this. Maybe it is a tiny point, but more eyes from legal-discuss@ won't hurt... On

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound

2011-12-05 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Uh, here's the TRAC License: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLicense. You have to do what it says. The language is very simple. So is the Copyright notice. If this is the codebase that you propose to be the foundation of Bloodhound development, I suspect that an SGA (Software Grant

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

2011-12-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under Apache 2.0 license, and as such falls under this: