Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

Hi, +1 binding (carried over from dev list). Al my usual checks done. If possible could someone double check the bundled software and LICENSE files as this was reasonably complex and I may of missed something. Also just a note that getting the source packages to compile is a bit on the tricky

[VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

Hello, The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source initiative for

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not just some engineers. -Todd On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Before we first publicly used the name, we

Copyright sign offs

Haven't done this in a while :) Thought I'd share that the following podlings have not yet signed off on their Copyright sections in their status reports. I mention this because I believe it's one of the first elements that should be signed off on the status report and it's a worry if projects

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

Hi Roman, Before we first publicly used the name, we were in touch with that project team, and got permission to do so. Additionally, I think the project scope/purpose is different enough that it wouldn't cause confusion. (fwiw based on tweets, I think there is also a fast food chain in Saudi

Project Kudu. .NET edition

Hi! while working on some .NET Foundation projects I've come across: https://www.dotnetfoundation.org/kudu Not sure how much of a problem this could be for Apache Kudu (incubating). Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 released

The Apache Kudu (incubating) team is happy to announce its first release as part of the ASF Incubator, version 0.7.0! Kudu is an open source storage engine for structured data which supports low-latency random access together with efficient analytical access patterns. It is designed within the

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Sean Zhong wrote: > sting this. > > If you want a direct look and feel of what it does, please see demo http://demo.gearpump.io (user: guest, password: guest) ;)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Feb 26, 2016, at 10:36 AM, James Taylor wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Regards, >> Arvind >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Arvind > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden > wrote: > > > The Quarks proposal has been discussed on the incubator list. The > > discussion

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

+1 (non-binding) thanks Prasad On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, 11:20 AM Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the positive discussion[1] and vote[2] in the Sentry > community and a discussion[3] on the incubator list to graduate > Sentry, I am calling a VOTE to

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

@Hen, That is awesome summary! Thanks for posting this. Sean On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Thought I'd share a report I generated from some code of mine on the > gearpump GitHub org (attached - though mail server may block). > > The highlights

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

+1 (binding) Regards, Arvind On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the positive discussion[1] and vote[2] in the Sentry > community and a discussion[3] on the incubator list to graduate > Sentry, I am calling a VOTE to graduate

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding), good project, everything looks good in the proposal. -Flavio > On 26 Feb 2016, at 15:09, chatz wrote: > > +1 > > On 26 February 2016 at 20:10, Phillip Rhodes > wrote: > >> +1 >> On Feb 26, 2016 09:38, "Daniel J Debrunner"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Arvind On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote: > The Quarks proposal has been discussed on the incubator list. The > discussion thread is at: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 26 February 2016 at 20:10, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > +1 > On Feb 26, 2016 09:38, "Daniel J Debrunner" wrote: > > > +1 ( non-binding - member request to join IPMC is pending) > > Thanks,Dan. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Feb 26, 2016 09:38, "Daniel J Debrunner" wrote: > +1 ( non-binding - member request to join IPMC is pending) > Thanks,Dan.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1  ( non-binding - member request to join IPMC is pending) Thanks,Dan.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

+1 (binding) Tom On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the positive discussion[1] and vote[2] in the Sentry > community and a discussion[3] on the incubator list to graduate > Sentry, I am calling a VOTE to graduate the project

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

Thought I'd share a report I generated from some code of mine on the gearpump GitHub org (attached - though mail server may block). The highlights are: * 9 repos. * High number of pull requests resolved (1026/1030). * Fairly high number of issues resolved (853/951). * Pull requests are resolved