Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:35 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde > wrote: > >> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. >> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

Roman Shaposhnik wrote on 3/22/16 4:56 PM: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. >> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. >> Once the project has entered

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > +1 (binding) -C > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3

+1 binding. Personally tested release on Arduino Zero and Simulated environments. Have seen it working on NRF51, NRF52 environments. Sterling On 3/22/16 2:50 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 binding Carried over from the dev list. Did all of my usual checks. Note if you’re compiling on OS X

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3

Hi, +1 binding Carried over from the dev list. Did all of my usual checks. Note if you’re compiling on OS X you may need to make a couple of minor mods to build.sh. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >Hi! > >Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal >and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > >Please vote to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/22/2016 10:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal and the feedback so far seems to be positive. Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache

[VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

Hi! Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal and the feedback so far seems to be positive. Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. [ ] +1 Accept

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. > Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. > Once the project has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends. +1000 to the

[VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3

Hello, The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source

Re: The Apache Way incubator page

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Christopher wrote: The page at http://incubator.apache.org/learn/theapacheway.html needs to be updated to reflect the new location of the ComDev mailing lists. It is no longer commun...@apache.org (and community-subscr...@apache.org), but is instead

Re: [DISCUSS] Quickstep incubation proposal

No, absolutely my comment wasn't supposed to have any insinuation about whether the project should get incubated or not from a proposal perspective. It was just a round about way of saying, I like the proposal, its fresh, looks sane and is something that's a bit different so it gets a +1 from me.

The Apache Way incubator page

The page at http://incubator.apache.org/learn/theapacheway.html needs to be updated to reflect the new location of the ComDev mailing lists. It is no longer commun...@apache.org (and community-subscr...@apache.org), but is instead d...@community.apache.org (and

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. Once the project has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends. While Calcite was in incubation no one (including the champion) had a clue what the role of

Re: [DISCUSS] Quickstep incubation proposal

That's a fair statement. In general, however, it isn't a concern of the Incubator if a proposed podling have some sort of resemblance with some other software out there. IINM, no one was rejected because they want to develop yet another web-application server or something like this. Cos On Tue,

Re: [DISCUSS] Quickstep incubation proposal

I actually have an opinion! I saw yet another database engine land and my heart sank Then I did some digging into quickstep and realised it was more of a "traditional" database that might take on the likes of Exasol etc rather than plugging more SQL into NOSQL etc(from what I gather) and I

Re: [DISCUSS] Quickstep incubation proposal

It's been a week since this thread started and surprisingly there isn't any reaction so far. Is it safe to assume the silent consensus has been reached? Cos On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:52PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > It is my pleasure to present the proposal to incubate the Quickstep

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

> On Mar 22, 2016, at 11:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell >> wrote: >>> There is a sorta technical reason for

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell > wrote: > > There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the > PMC > > of the sponsor. > > > > I’d expect the

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > It simple I like that. :) As expressed in another thread, I believe simple rules are really helpful for newcomers. > It will also tend to make NOTICE > files larger and that has a flow on effect to downstream

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

is this just personal catharsis? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell > wrote: >> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC >> of the

Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC > of the sponsor. > > I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the private@ list and to have > binding votes on podling releases. These

Re: Wiki Access for Apache Incubator Proposal.

Thanks Marvin, That was blazingly fast, much appreciated! Best, Arthur On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Arthur Wiedmer > wrote: > > > Could I please be added to the Incubator