On 11 June 2012 11:52, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
but the generated html
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan/src/main
Those RAT files have not been updated since 2008.
On 11 June 2012 21:18, Robert Burrell Donkin rdon...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/11/12 15:17, sebb wrote:
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan
On 9 June 2012 05:54, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Jun 8 23:55:11 2012
New Revision: 1348282
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282view=rev
Log:
flume started to graduate.
oozie updated status page.
oozie news about 2
On 9 June 2012 02:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch
/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml
thanks regards,
juan pablo
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpa...@apache.org
Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: DOAP file for Apache JSPWiki (incubating)
To: sebb
On 12 June 2012 19:16, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
@sebb: yes, the asfext:pmc entry is corrected
Could you change the name entry as follows please:
nameApache JSPWiki (incubating)/name
I know SIS and Stanbol don't do this currently, but those ought
OK, added to files.xml
On 12 June 2012 19:32, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
done, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:26 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 June 2012 19:16, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
@sebb: yes
On 14 June 2012 17:34, Joe Stein crypt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is the first candidate for the second incubator release for
Apache Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
This release fixes the following issues
On 22 June 2012 01:29, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevan,
I agree that to the benefit of users, it would be reasonable for Apache
projects to include license/notice for all dependant jars (directly or
indirectly) in a release. However, this has to be done automatically by
tools, not
On 24 June 2012 14:11, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 6/24/12 10:46 AM, Chris Douglas a écrit :
Kevan-
Hi, jumping on this thread, because we have had similar discussions on
another incubating project I'm mentoring...
This argument is logical, but that doesn't make it
On 24 June 2012 17:30, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The NL files only apply to what is included in the release archive itself.
+1
If there are other dependencies, these can be listed in a
DEPENDENCIES or README
On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
Results:
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
bcprov
commons-beanutils
commons-codec
commons-collections
ehcache-core
httpclient
httpcore
etc.
Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot
-jar-1.1.jar instead of activation.jar
?
Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
or Line 327 instead of For SLF4J: slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar
Thanks,
Sebastian
2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
@Sebb: Which
On 26 June 2012 16:26, Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).
This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with
+1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes
So, we
On 28 June 2012 13:12, twilli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: twilliams
Date: Thu Jun 28 12:12:43 2012
New Revision: 1354971
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354971view=rev
Log:
typo
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml
Modified:
Or just do it every time the Incubator site is built.
There are likely to be enough changes to ensure it runs once a month.
On 29 June 2012 08:57, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Ask infra to add it as a cron task.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012, at 09:29 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 29 June 2012 08:14, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 29/06/2012 01:04, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've drafted a couple of XSLTs for this need:
Great!
2.
On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4
Vote result:
+1 (binding):
On 2 July 2012 14:42, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
The vote has already passed on direct memory dev
On 3 July 2012 19:02, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Incubator Members,
this is the 3th Release Candidate (the second Candidate was voted negative
by the IPMC because of missing exact JAR filenames in LICENSE file and
missing sources as ZIP not only as .tar.gz)
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
See release notes:
2012/7/3 seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
is this the only concern or are there any other objections that will only
be checked in the next round?
Sebastian
2012/7/3 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 3 July 2012 19:02, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Incubator
On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org
On 7 July 2012 07:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/7 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/7/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1
On 11 July 2012 22:26, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one
technicality of the apache release process blocking the release
(distributing dependencies alongside source), although not a tough one.
I'll
On 27 July 2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
I believe Bill is complaining not about the venue,
but the choice of referring to this package as
a release candidate instead of
the proposal made my Jukka includes this matter.
Le 7/27/12 11:32 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 27 July 2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
wrote:
On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
I believe Bill is complaining not about
On 11 August 2012 00:12, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
policies
On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3
+1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes
from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
The vote
On 13 August 2012 03:07, cross...@apache.org wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Mon Aug 13 02:07:22 2012
New Revision: 1372240
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1372240view=rev
Log:
AWF is retiring.
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
Modified:
On 12 August 2012 11:20, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need
3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1
On 11 August 2012 00:12, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
policies
On 14 August 2012 02:40, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Mon Aug 13 02:07:22 2012
New Revision: 1372240
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1372240view=rev
Log:
AWF is retiring.
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content
On 14 August 2012 03:55, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Alan, thanks for updating Oozie status page.
Sebb, Bertrand, does the updated status page address your concerns?
Yes, thanks.
Regarding Bertrand suggestion about leaving an Apache member on the
PMC, We was not aware
On 16 August 2012 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
We have already called and completed a community VOTE with the Any23
community and the Tika PMC and they have positively recommended Any23's
graduation from the Incubator.
According to the
On 16 August 2012 17:42, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Sebb,
On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:32 AM, sebb wrote:
On 16 August 2012 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
We have already called and completed a community VOTE
On 16 August 2012 18:55, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Sebb,
On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:47 AM, sebb wrote:
X. Establish the Apache Any23 Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent
Please note that manually updated directories and files under
dist/incubator (and site files) should always have group = incubator
and should be group-writable.
[If the podling is using svnpubsub then the rules are different; owner
= group = svnwc and it does not have to be group writable]
not exclusively).
The phrase needs to mention the other data that is involved.
Sound better?
sebb wrote:
At first glance, with the previous version in mind, it seems better.
But when re-read in isolation the phrase implies to me that only RDF
data is involved.
==
Not sure how well known RDF
On 17 August 2012 10:29, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that manually updated directories and files under
dist/incubator (and site files) should always have group = incubator
and should be group-writable.
[If the podling is using svnpubsub then the rules are different; owner
On 18 August 2012 18:20, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
situation.
Done.
On 18 August 2012 13:24, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating). This will be the second incubator release for
Apache OpenOffice after the 3.4 release with already more than 11 million
On 21 August 2012 14:38, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think
On 11 September 2012 16:55, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
A slight correction below-- Matthias is not on the Crunch PPMC, and so his
+1 vote should have been marked as non-binding. Apologies.
AIUI only Incubator PMC (IPMC) member votes are binding for release votes.
IMO
On 12 September 2012 17:08, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator
The Apache Bigtop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have grown the community in users and contributors, and we've made
On 14 September 2012 13:57, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
The most useful file containing the project classpath is only formatted
automatically, it cannot be generated without project-specific knowledge.
There is no techical problem to drop these files, yet developers who
On 14 September 2012 17:53, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone seriously believe that IP notices are required in files like
these?
These files cannot be copyrighted because they do not have any
'creative' content. If they can't be copyrighted, they can't be
licensed.
On 17 September 2012 23:36, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
crossley wrote:
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/history/current.txt
Thanks for keeping that file up to date! The graph at
http://incubator.apache.org/history/ is quite useful.
On 18 September 2012 03:32, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
crossley wrote:
r1386462
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/history/current.txt
Thanks for keeping that file up to date! The graph at
http
On 18 September 2012 12:07, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 September 2012 03:32, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
crossley wrote:
r1386462
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/history/current.txt
Thanks
On 2 October 2012 00:00, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 00:06:38 +0200:
PPS. It would be nice if we could use Apache Steve for the election.
Volunteers?
no need
for a more complicated voting process.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Also is there any reason to vote in secret?
AFAIK all other PMC chair votes are just held on the private list.
Using Steve (as currently implemented) involves quite a bit of overhead.
My
On 10 October 2012 16:54, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
The Incubator docs state:
The website is published by checking out the content from SVN into the
directory/www/incubator.apache.org/content/podlingname on people.apache.org.
When I try to do this, I get
svn checkout
On 11 October 2012 02:39, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:31:30 -0400:
Not too much. We still instruct users take the signatures and verify
them against blah.apache.org/KEYS. John Blackhat could replace the
signatures and install his
On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting
On 12 October 2012 08:16, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:08:53 +0100:
On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote
On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
in point: CMS TLP
On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process
Agreed - we
On 17 October 2012 09:47, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I just created the Ripple podling site and in so doing I mistakenly
left in some broken xml in ripple.xml
Running the sanity build locally reported success. So I published the
live site which was missing (as you would
On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
files
On 23 October 2012 16:43, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time
On 23 October 2012 18:57, Matthias Friedrich m...@mafr.de wrote:
On Tuesday, 2012-10-23, sebb wrote:
[...]
There is something wrong when downloading using a browser.
I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same
(corrupted) file. However Opera is OK.
Downloaded
) so we really need somebody else to review this release and/or
sign up as an extra mentor.
Sebb: Can you please check it out again and if all looks good change your
vote? The mentioned problems aren't related to the artifact itself, and we
do like to get our first release out..
Sebb?
Sorry
On 30 October 2012 20:18, Florian Holeczek flor...@holeczek.de wrote:
Hi all,
taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy.
Sebb wrote:
The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license.
In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
single-click installation of the
On 1 November 2012 20:03, Carol Frampton cfram...@adobe.com wrote:
On 11/1/12 7 :16AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
Apache
Flex SDK Installer (Incubating
On 1 November 2012 21:05, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 11/1/12 1:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
public PGP key servers.
I presume you would like Om to publish his key.
Yes, that is required so end users can
On 1 November 2012 18:15, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for taking a look :-) Responses inline:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:16 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our first release as Apache Flex, we
On 20 November 2012 23:22, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
(Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable
On 22 November 2012 10:42, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
When a podling graduates, their unix group needs to created and
initialised with the committers of that podling. Is it possible to get
that set of availid's programmatically?
Basically, do I have options other than use
On 22 November 2012 12:15, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
sebb wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:25:48 +:
On 22 November 2012 10:42, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
When a podling graduates, their unix group needs to created and
initialised with the committers
On 22 November 2012 22:16, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
...
If someone wants to scrape a file, I'd suggest adding a script to
foundation/board/scripts which would take the date as a parameter and then
scrape ../board_minutes_date to find the new projects.
The result of
On 9 December 2012 07:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Kalumet 0.6-incubating. This will be our first release. A vote was held
on the developer mailing list and passed with 7 +1s:
the licenses for all software included
with the archives, starting with the AL.
Not sure to understand you remarks.
Regards
JB
On 12/11/2012 10:11 PM, sebb wrote:
On 9 December 2012 07:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing
On 12 December 2012 07:03, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
The doc for updating the Incubator web site seems to be inconsistent
with the situation at hand.
Yeah, a few of us have added bits and pieces to try to keep up,
but yes it needs improvement. A lot of
in the associated NOTICE file.
Regards
JB
On 12/12/2012 10:53 AM, sebb wrote:
On 12 December 2012 06:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi,
I don't get you for the NOTICE:
1/ the date is the date of the NOTICE creation, so the entry of Kalumet
in
the incubator
But the notice
On 2 January 2013 10:08, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Onami is not listed below, but we have a Doap file (which needs some
maintenance :-)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/committers/doap_Onami.rdf
Three questions, because I am not so familiar with Doap
On 29 December 2012 23:42, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier
On 29 December 2012 12:28, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
more than 72h have passed and the current [VOTE] can be considered
concluded and passes with the following resolution:
five +1 votes from following IPMC:
* Benson Margulies
* Alan Cabrera
* Olivier Lamy
*
On 20 December 2012 13:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Kalumet 0.6-incubating (2nd try). This will be our first release. A vote was
held on the developer mailing list and passed with 6 +1s:
+1
On 8 January 2013 22:19, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
A vote was held on the developer mailing list and passed with 5 +1s:
On 9 January 2013 01:38, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 January 2013 22:19, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
On 9 January 2013 13:13, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Sebb,
In (almost) all other podlings it is at the top of the SVN tree.
IMO it should be present alongside NOTICE and LICENSE so it is obvious to
people browsing SVN.
Thanks for the input. I already made this change
as blocker for this
first release ?
I consider it a blocker.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/07/2013 10:13 PM, sebb wrote:
On 20 December 2012 13:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Kalumet 0.6
On 12 January 2013 17:31, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
The Apache Onami PPMC voted for Apache Onami Parent 2-incubating[1]
which already collected 2 IPMC binding votes:
SVN source tag:
On 14 January 2013 23:42, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:52 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
+Bundling Permissively-Licensed Dependencies
+===
+
+Bundling a dependency which is issued under one of the following
On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos ryan.ol...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
(incubating)
in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
The vote PPMC vote thread:
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
podling
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is
Please remember to publish the site after committing updates.
On 1 February 2013 12:49, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Fri Feb 1 12:49:29 2013
New Revision: 1441429
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441429view=rev
Log:
Replace silly dots with nbsp; entities.
Add
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an
On 1 February 2013 17:05, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14
On 1 February 2013 19:48, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf
On 22 February 2013 06:56, Till Westmann t...@westmann.org wrote:
Please verify and vote on the first release candidate for our first release
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-RC1.
Since this is our first release we would appreciate a thorough review.
The tag to be voted on is
On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar maha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote
was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them
binding.
mahadev (IPMC, PPMC)
ddas (IPMC, PPMC)
acmurthy
On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
separate files for each hash type.
Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
In what way
On 27 March 2013 17:23, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
So we just set out a policy for podlings to follow that says something
like: if you use a project-specific announce@ list, anything you send to it
must
601 - 700 of 1540 matches
Mail list logo
