I don't know what it takes to become and IPMC member, but I kind of like the
idea of having roles that don't require such formality (I may think too highly
of the process and role), but still can be recognized as providing guidance and
knowledge to those going through the process.
Date: Thu, 8
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument - Marvin
said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard
requirement,
then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready for AOO and will not be
until suitable infrastructure and legal institutions to
Simple enough - thanks.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:05:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
From: gst...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing
at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument -
Marvin said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a
hard requirement,
then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready for AOO
+1
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Sent: 8/16/2012 6:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: any23-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Any23 from the Apache Incubator
Hi Folks,
We have already called and completed a community VOTE with the
The vote passes with the following +1's (these of course are in addition to the
40+ lucene.Net community +1s):
Stefan Bodewig
Jukka Zitting
Benson Margulies
Gianugo Rabellion
Troy Howard
We'll now be submitting our resolution to the Board,
Thanks all,
~Prescott
Hey all,
The Lucene.Net community feels ready to graudate. Our internal vote was a
success (~40 +1's and a bit of a mess because we had a number of mailing lists
which spread our vote out - sorry about that spam). We had some concerns
regarding the size and activity of our community, however,
Hey all,
I think we're ready to move along in the graduation process. If you would
please review our graduation resolution and provide any feedback the Lucene.Net
team would greatly appreciate it:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template
Hey All,
This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project
(incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to
see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project.
Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe
It's a good idea - we're going to discuss this and see what we can do. I
definitely would like to bring in some new committers. I know that the
committers we do have are extremely busy with other parts of their lives - it
would be great to bring in some new people who can help out. We'll do
Hey all, We've had a community member port a library for Lucene.Net that we'd
like to include in our contrib packages. The package is under the apache 2.0
license, so we think we are in the clear to include the code into our contrib
package - but we weren't sure and just wanted to double
the relevant points:
http://s.apache.org/HZa
I don't know if Itamar ever followed up after that and filed a ICLA.
If he did, we're good and just need to commit the code.. Otherwise,
we'll need him to do the ICLA first.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx
+1
From: Marvin Humphrey
Sent: 2/1/2012 8:06 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: mentoring individuals as well as projects
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:54:18PM +, Ross Gardler wrote:
My point is that when we help guide individuals who
@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-01-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release.
This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we
have used generics where appropriate
Result] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating
On 28 January 2012 20:53, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
This vote passes with the required 3 +1's from Sebb, Ant, and Stefan. Thank
you guys for taking the time to review and approve this release, ~Prescott
Date:
I did
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating
From: seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 23 January 2012 06:20, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release.
This is very similar to our release
Hi all,
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release.
This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we have used
generics where appropriate to give it a better feel for .Net developers.
SVN Tag:
Search: Drop Or Retain?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey Robert, its not clear to me why a suitable name search should be dropped
- is that because the brand team will do this search on a projects behalf?
This seems likely to me
But this is a POLL
From: Robert Burrell Donkin
Sent: 12/1/2011 10:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Suitable Name Search: Drop Or Retain?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Completely agree , if there is a rule list I dont think
+1
From: sebb
Sent: 11/30/2011 3:53 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RFC] Proposed voting description edits
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The
Hey Robert, its not clear to me why a suitable name search should be dropped -
is that because the brand team will do this search on a projects behalf?
I see nameprotect is outdated, but a quick search by project members to see if
there are conflicts is still probably a good thing. It just
updated
in the release
+1
...ant
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
We could use another vote or two,
Thanks!
-P
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Benson Margulies
Sent: 11/25/2011 11
Hi all,
We could use another vote or two,
Thanks!
-P
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Benson Margulies
Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
Well, fine, I am happy to +1.
On
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
ready for your testing and voting.
Release candidate artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
SVN tag revision:
24 matches
Mail list logo