Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread costinm
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Caldera agree with a lot of the concerns expressed by Apache. We would like to > >> see more to be done to protect the interests of open source providers. > > > > Did Caldera understand what they voted for? If they agree with Apache why did > > they vot

Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Sam Ruby
Kevin Burton wrote: > >> Caldera agree with a lot of the concerns expressed by Apache. We would like to >> see more to be done to protect the interests of open source providers. > > Did Caldera understand what they voted for? If they agree with Apache why did > they vote yes? Apparently, Apple,

Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Kevin A. Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sad, but true: > > http://jcp.org/jsr/results/99-7-1.jsp I demand a recount! :) OK... this is strange: > On 11-Mar-2002, Caldera voted YES with the following comment: > Caldera agree with a lot of the

Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Still I think it is time for a Jon style headline on the front page. Perhaps something with shock appeal like "JSPA Vote Screws open source and makes Microsoft look open" -- Just my opinion. Send a press release to CNET this time, they were quite interested. -Andy On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 17:42,

Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread dirkx
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Steven Noels wrote: > Sad, but true: > > http://jcp.org/jsr/results/99-7-1.jsp Do not despair - you got something good - some biggies being quite vocal and supportive of a standpoint univocally attributed to apache -and- generally considered as reasonable and lofty. And rig

Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 3/13/02 2:10 PM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, this is a vote prior to going public draft, so hopefully we are > still able to raise even more attention and really get what we want. The > comments of IBM and the like clearly indicate to me that the revised > JSPA will not b

RE: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Steven Noels
I wrote: > The > comments of IBM and the like clearly indicate to me that the revised > JSPA will be 'nirvana'. ^^^ Uh-oh... 'not be nirvana', of course. Must go to bed ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Steven Noels
Pier Fumagalli wrote: > I don't know how much "sadness" there is in that vote. Of > course it's not a > victory, but reading from the comments of the different voters (at the > bottom), the issues we raised were listened to, and given > some thought. Well, this is a vote prior to going public dr

Re: the story continues... JSPA community draft ballot results

2002-03-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sad, but true: > > http://jcp.org/jsr/results/99-7-1.jsp > > I don't know how much "sadness" there is in that vote. Of course it's not a victory, but reading from the comments of the different voters (at the bottom), the issues we raised were listen