Rahul Akolkar wrote:
If there is a connection to be drawn, I think many probably won't ;-)
Always the risk with names that don't spell out precisely what name.
You can easily be *too* clever, this could be one of those cases.
I'd refrain from voting until a formal thread appears on the subj
On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All would be describable (assuming no clashes) as:
>
> Apache Jakarta Web Components
> Apache Web Components
>
> There's the option of doing W*4J or something, but we can discuss that
> later I think as it's just an altered presentation of th
For what it's worth, I actually like Silk a great deal... in fact, I'd
go ahead and give it my non-binding +1... I was the one that put the
idea on the Wiki of a more codeword-ish name, and I think Silk is perfect.
Frank
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How about Apache Spider Web?
No, but you just
> How about Apache Spider Web?
No, but you just gave me an idea:
Apache Silk
Silk is what webs are made of.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
How about Apache Spider Web? ;) Sorts of like it traps things, double-entendre
on the meaning of web, etc.. Just thought I'd throw it out there ;)
Yoav
--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also Web parts appears to be a Microsoft term
>
> I have a shirt around here someo
> Has there been any discussion with the Incubator PMC whether this
> contribution needs to come through them? Or does this somehow not
> fit into their purview?
All external codebases brought into the ASF need to come through the
Incubator. Sometimes, as Henri noted, that only requires the IP c
> Also Web parts appears to be a Microsoft term
I have a shirt around here someone regarding "Parts for Java", which was a
product from ParcPlace.
Apache WebParts would be OK with me, but I care more about the content of
the project than the name.
--- Noel
-
Martin Cooper wrote:
Some other names were added to the wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/CreatingCommonsForWebComponents
I forgot to add some names to that page:
Webbies(has the same idea of weblets, but causing less confusion)
Jakartlets (someone suggested we use a name without
egal issues are likely simpler than other SF
projects that have migrated into Apache. I don't know how much of the
initial load of the Web Components/Common project is expected to come from
javawebparts.sf.net.
The initial load would be rearrangement of existing Jakarta codebase; some
Co
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 16:27 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
> NOTE-2
> ==
> Despite the suitability of this name, we are hesitant to duplicate the
> Commons brand and confuse the user.
even though Apache WC would definitely tickled many brits...
- robert
took a quick look at the javawebparts.sf.net site which currently
> looks essentially like Frank Zammetti's personal site, nothing in the
> CVS, only one committer, etc, so the legal issues are likely simpler
> than other SF projects that have migrated into Apache. I
On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Prior to calling a vote tomorrow, am I missing any potential names. This
> is all I dredged out of the previous mail thread. 'webapp' was mentioned
> instead of 'web'; but didn't seem to get any traction.
>
>
> web b
> Yep, that's a decision we all make in contributing to the ASF communities.
> Are you happy to go with the commuhnity view, or want to keep things
> closer to your chest.
I think too that it's maybe a little easier to go with the community view
when its a project you didn't yourself give birth t
how much of the initial load of
the Web Components/Common project is expected to come from
javawebparts.sf.net.
The initial load would be rearrangement of existing Jakarta codebase; some
Commons components and Taglibs.
I can't see Frank's codebase being wanted without Frank himself being
Prior to calling a vote tomorrow, am I missing any potential names. This
is all I dredged out of the previous mail thread. 'webapp' was mentioned
instead of 'web'; but didn't seem to get any traction.
web bricks
web components
web parts (NOTE-1)
web commons
t the javawebparts.sf.net site which currently
looks essentially like Frank Zammetti's personal site, nothing in the
CVS, only one committer, etc, so the legal issues are likely simpler
than other SF projects that have migrated into Apache. I don't know
how much of the initial load of the
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
+1.
Let's leave Jakarta out of the names. It's assumed. So in the acronym
example from Frank, it would be Apache Jakarta WP4J and not JWP4J.
Makes sense.
Firstly, don't worry about the committership part Frank. I'm certain that
if you had a dec
> +1.
>
> Let's leave Jakarta out of the names. It's assumed. So in the acronym
> example from Frank, it would be Apache Jakarta WP4J and not JWP4J.
Makes sense.
> Firstly, don't worry about the committership part Frank. I'm certain that
> if you had a decently sized lump of code accepted, and wa
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 8/9/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way
On 8/9/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
> > > the best way to handle the name issue.
On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
> > the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a
> > consensus. opinions?
>
I
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
> the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a
> consensus. opinions?
An informal thread was here [
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jak
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
point)... It seems like there might be a risk of sub-projects within
sub-projects within sub-projects, which I'm not sure would be the best
organizational stucture... if you had Jakarta Taglibs as a sub-component
of the JWP4J project (assume for the sake of argument that
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
AIUI everything will be flat: collective management and only social
divisions. standard taglibs will become a jakarta sub-project.
+1, I agree.
BTW is there any real reason not to start the promotion process for
standard taglibs ASAP?
None
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:14 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> On Mon, August 8, 2005 12:42 pm, robert burrell donkin said:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
> >> Anyway, the Jakarta Taglib Project has voted how it would like to take
> >> part on this new project, and the
On Mon, August 8, 2005 12:42 pm, robert burrell donkin said:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
>> to another list or has it just staled?
>
> in a holding pattern:
>
> IMO the proposal c
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
> to another list or has it just staled?
in a holding pattern:
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way to
Hello all,
What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
to another list or has it just staled?
Anyway, the Jakarta Taglib Project has voted how it would like to take
part on this new project, and the result was:
1.The Jakarta Taglibs Project would like to be merge
28 matches
Mail list logo
