Rumen Yotov wrote:
>Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>
>
>>Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his hard
>>>work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer
>>>to
>>>help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 serie
Stroller wrote:
> Hi,
>
. far to long.
>
> Stroller.
>
In summary and simple conclusion, yes you are wrong. So that makes 2 out
of the 4 or 5 active Mobile herd devs who say you're wrong. brix is 100%
correct. Let me give you an explaination
"The firmware itself
Hi,
I thought about filing another bug about this, but decided I'd rather
whine about it in public to get a better airing / flaming /
understanding of the issues.
Using a wireless network card under linux may require various
components:
- the hardware driver itself
- a firmware to be upload
On Friday 20 May 2005 21:30, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
>
>
> > I intend that the package to be installed should not assume anything
> > about where its dependencies are and should query portage for them all.
>
> Oh no, now many things get much clearer to me :(
>
> But - ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Cummings wrote:
> It's a nice idea (I know I recently opened "negotiations" up with the mips
> team for access so I could close some of my open bugs against them), but the
> two problems I can see with this are: remote access tends to mean yo
On Fri, 20 May 2005 19:11:13 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| O, so true, so true...
|
| I am trying to redeem myself with the following. Care to give it a
| try?
Pretty close, thanks. I think I'll adapt it a bit to define a cluster in
make.vim and then add to that cluster i
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 22:22 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Not gonna happen. Emulators don't cut it and won't find all the problems
> (but they will find a load of other bogus non-issues). Plus, from
> experience I'd say that at least half our devs wouldn't have a clue
> where to start when doing
On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:51:51 -0500 Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Wouldn't it be better from a QA perspective to go back to the (really)
| old policy of dropping anything you can't test on. I know that puts
| more work on you guys, but this is only going to get worse as we get
| more de
On Friday 20 May 2005 16:51, Brian Jackson wrote:
>
> Get every dev access to all the supported arches (some of this could
> probably be done with emulators of some sort, qemu or somesuch). Make them
> test on every arch before they change any keywords.
It's a nice idea (I know I recently opened "
Jason Wever wrote:
>
> From my perspective, if a package maintainer asks for testing and the
> ability to keyword (i.e. Spanky asking me if it was OK to bump binutils
> to 2.16, to which I said yes) then that is fine. However adding or
> changing keywords in an ebuild for which you cannot test (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Sorry folks this was my fault. I've sent my grovelling apology to the
sparc team. Hopefully they'll accept my apologies and put my digressions
down to me being a new dev. :-)
You can only take some of the credit
On Friday 20 May 2005 02:53 pm, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> Sorry folks this was my fault.
ah, good to know ... thought it might have been my binutils-2.16 ~sparc
marking, but i guess that's somewhat sane since Weeve gave it a quick run and
it seems to be OK thus far ...
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.o
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:42 -0600, Jason Wever wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> OK, let's review this again.
>
> If you cannot test a given ebuild on a given arch, then don't touch that
> arch's keyword (unless you need to remove it for broken dependencies).
>
> If y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, let's review this again.
If you cannot test a given ebuild on a given arch, then don't touch that
arch's keyword (unless you need to remove it for broken dependencies).
If you can test for a given arch and are not part of that arch team,
please p
On Monday 16 May 2005 23:48, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am operating a small IT service organization and I would like to
> > put a link to Gentoo on my site. My ad:
>
> [snip]
>
> > If there is a standard ad that you would prefer, I will use it. This
> > is
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:27, Marius Mauch wrote:
>
> Well, it's valid with portage-2.1, but not 2.0.
Concerning that, how far are we from it being testable by the general
developer population?
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
On Monday 16 May 2005 15:04, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>
> The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
> for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
> orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
> allowed by portage.
in any case it should be _pY
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> I intend that the package to be installed should not assume anything about
> where its dependencies are and should query portage for them all.
Oh no, now many things get much clearer to me :(
But - aren't there many settings left over to the packages to decide,
at least
maillog: 20/05/2005-10:29:53(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:01:04 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > | %.1 : %.in
> | > | @regex_cmd@ -e "s,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@,$(VERSION),g" $? >
> $@
> | > |
> | > | The first "@" is span.Specia
maillog: 20/05/2005-18:01:04(+0900): Георги Георгиев
types
> maillog: 20/05/2005-07:22:15(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> > Hrm, that's a vim thing (I'm using a vim script to do the highlighting
> > at compile time, it's not manual). If someone enjoys pain the
On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:01:04 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > | %.1 : %.in
| > | @regex_cmd@ -e "s,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@,$(VERSION),g" $? > $@
| > |
| > | The first "@" is span.Special and the second one is span.Constant.
| >
| > Hrm, that's a vim thing (I'm using a v
maillog: 20/05/2005-07:22:15(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:06:12 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | The phrase "when an option is specified" is a bit ambiguous,
> | especially since it is later referred by the explanation of
> | AC_ARG_WITH. I was not sure
Hello.
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
The upgrade for bugs.gentoo.org went exactly as I had planned for.
Completed in under 20 minutes, which included this email. I've upgraded
our Bugzilla from the old 2.18rc2 to 2.18.1. This fixes more security
and code than I can even begin to mention. I have cleaned out
23 matches
Mail list logo
